The Psychology of BNPL Repayment Procrastination: Behavioral Insights on Present Bias and Financial Motivation
Keywords:
Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL), financial procrastination, present bias, Temporal Motivation Theory (TMT), consumer credit behaviorAbstract
This study aims to examine BNPL repayment procrastination through the lens of Temporal Motivation Theory (TMT), particularly focusing on three key components, namely present bias, value, and delay (installment period). To achieve the study aim, survey data were collected from 134 active BNPL users in Indonesia and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The obtained results showed that present bias significantly increased BNPL repayment procrastination, while perceived value (reward) did not directly reduce it. Furthermore, delay (installment period) was found to positively contribute to procrastination but did not moderate the relationship between present bias and procrastination. The insignificant moderating effects of value and delay suggest that long-term BNPL users may not prioritize rewards when postponing repayments. The results also show that financially stable users with fixed incomes and short-term installment preferences have less tendency to procrastinate, while those with high outstanding balances or longer installment plans face greater risks. This study extends the application of TMT in a fintech context and provides practical insights for improving BNPL risk assessments, designing repayment schemes, and promoting financial literacy. As a recommendation, future investigation should explore factors such as self-control, financial literacy, and perceived financial stress to gain deeper insights into BNPL repayment behavior across diverse consumer segments.
References
Aithal, A., & Aithal, P. S. (2020). Development and Validation of Survey Questionnaire & Experimental Data-A Systematical Review-based Statistical Approach. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3724105
Ariely, D., & Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment. Psychological Science, 13(3), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00441
Barboza, G. (2017). I Will Pay Tomorrow, or Maybe the Day After. Credit Card Repayment, Present Biased and Procrastination: Credit Card Repayment, Present Biased and Procrastination. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.12106
Barclay, D. W., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Use as an Illustration. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242663837
Berns, G., & Laibson, D. (2007). Intertemporal choice – toward an integrative framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.011
Bisin, A., & Hyndman, K. (2020). Present-bias, procrastination and deadlines in a field experiment. Games and Economic Behavior, 119, 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEB.2019.11.010
Boynton, P. M., & Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ, 328(7451), 1312–1315. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312
Breig, Z., Gibson, M., Shrader, J. G., Andreoni, J., Dahl, G., Faravelli, M., Giuntella, O., Kline, J., Macleod, B., Schilbach, F., Sprenger, C., Willis, J., Kassabian, G., & Mann, A. (2019). Why Do We Procrastinate? Present Bias and Optimism. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3445511
Cadena, X., & Schoar, A. (2011). Remembering to Pay? Reminders vs. Financial Incentives for Loan Payments. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17020
Dehaan, E., Lourie, B., Kim, J., & Zhu, C. (2023). Buy Now Pay (Pain?) Later. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4230633
Dewitte, S., & Schouwenburg, H. (2002). Procrastination, Temptations, and Incentives: The Struggle between the Present and the Future in Procrastinators and the Punctual. European Journal of Personality, 16, 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.461
Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). Wiley.
Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2018). The value of online surveys: a look back and a look ahead. In Internet Research (Vol. 28, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2018-0089
Fomin, F. V., Fraigniaud, P., & Golovach, P. A. (2022). Present-biased optimization. Mathematical Social Sciences, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2022.06.001
Granello, D. H., & Wheaton, J. E. (2004). Online data collection: Strategies for research. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00325.x
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354331182
Halim, N. A., Salleh, S. M., Mustapa, S. N. S., Rozali, N., & Khairi, S. M. M. (2024). From Instant Gratification to Long-Term Consequences: How Buy Now, Pay Later Influences Consumer Behavior and Financial Stability. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(IX), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.809035
Holmes, S. (2009). Methodological and ethical considerations in designing an Internet study of quality of life: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(3), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJNURSTU.2008.08.004
Huang, J., & Golman, R. (2019). The Influence of Length of Delay and Task Aversiveness on Procrastination Behaviors. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v11n4p73
Humphrey, P., & Harbin, J. (2010). an Exploratory Study of the Effect of Rewards and Deadlines on Academic Procrastination in Web-Based Classes. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(4).
Indonesia Business Post. (2023, January 19). The rise and risk of PayLater trend | Indonesia Business Post. https://indonesiabusinesspost.com/980/investment-and-risk/the-rise-and-risk-of-paylater-trend
Isaac, J. (2025, January 8). Indonesians’ Paylater debts soar, driving BNPL growth and rising loan defaults | Indonesia Business Post. https://indonesiabusinesspost.com/3496/investment-and-risk/indonesians-paylater-debts-soar-driving-bnpl-growth-and-rising-loan-defaults
Khan, Mr. H., Dr.ReshmaSultana, P. H., & Hayat, Dr. M. (2024). Rethinking Credit Cards, Transforming Debt Dynamics, and Revolutionizing Interest Impacts in Contemporary Society. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36713/epra16563
Knowles, S., Servátka, M., Sullivan, T., & Genc, M. (2021). Procrastination and the non‐monotonic effect of deadlines on task completion. Economic Inquiry, 60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.13042
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2016). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods: Sample size in PLS-based SEM. Information Systems Journal, 28. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Kuchler, T., & Pagel, M. (2021). Sticking to your plan: The role of present bias for credit card paydown. Journal of Financial Economics, 139(2), 359–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFINECO.2020.08.002
Levin, K. A. (2006). Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 7(1), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375
Maji, S. K., & Prasad, S. (2025). Present bias and its influence on financial behaviours amongst Indians. IIM Ranchi Journal of Management Studies, 4(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/IRJMS-02-2024-0009
Mamun, M. Z. A., & Khan, M. Y. H. (2020). A Theoretical Study On Factors Influencing Employees Performance, Rewards And Motivation Within Organisation. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(3), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.4(3).113-124.2020
Marshall, G. L., Kahana, E., Gallo, W. T., Stansbury, K. L., & Thielke, S. (2021). The price of mental well-being in later life: the role of financial hardship and debt. Aging and Mental Health, 25(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1758902
Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J. H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.4(2)01
Meyer, A. G. (2015). The impacts of elicitation mechanism and reward size on estimated rates of time preference. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 58, 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCEC.2015.08.002
Muhamad, N. (2023, October 25). 8 Layanan Paylater Terpopuler di Indonesia, Shopee Paylater Juara. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/keuangan/statistik/1c97d81669f0cb7/8-layanan-paylater-terpopuler-di-indonesia-shopee-paylater-juara
Muhamad, N. (2024, July 4). Milenial dan Gen Z Mendominasi Pengguna Paylater di Indonesia. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/demografi/statistik/66b5d6e18dff3/milenial-dan-gen-z-mendominasi-pengguna-paylater-di-indonesia
Munir, S., & Krowin, M. (2024). Sistem Reward dan Punishment sebagai Pemicu dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Forum Manajemen Indonesia, 2, 5–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47747/snfmi.v2i1.2426
O’Brien, L., Ramsay, I., & Ali, P. (2024). Innovation, Disruption and Consumer Harm in the Buy Now Pay Later Industry: An Empirical Study. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 47. https://doi.org/10.53637/ZXAN7475
O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89(1). https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.103
OJK. (2024, December 31). id berita-dan-kegiatan siaran-pers Pages LPBBTI-dan-BNPL.aspx - ojk-go. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Pages/LPBBTI-dan-BNPL.aspx
OJK. (2025, January 7). Siaran Pers: Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Jasa Keuangan untuk Sektor Jasa Keuangan yang Stabil dan Berdaya Tahan. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Pages/RDKB-Desember-2024.aspx
Peters, J., Bromberg, U., Schneider, S., Brassen, S., Menz, M., Banaschewski, T., Conrod, P. J., Flor, H., Gallinat, J., Garavan, H., Heinz, A., Itterman, B., Lathrop, M., Martinot, J. L., Paus, T., Poline, J. B., Robbins, T. W., Rietschel, M., Smolka, M., … Büchel, C. (2011). Lower ventral striatal activation during reward anticipation in adolescent smokers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168(5). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10071024
Sasaki, S., Xie, S., Ikeda, S., Qin, J., & Tsutsui, Y. (2008). Time Discounting: The Delay Effect and Procrastinating Behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1314625
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach (8th ed.). Wiley.
Siaputra, I. B. (2010). Temporal Motivation Theory: Best Theory (yet) to Explain Procrastination. Anima Indonesian Psychological Journal, 25(3).
Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
Steel, P. (2010). Arousal, avoidant and decisional procrastinators: Do they exist? Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 926–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2010.02.025
Steel, P., & König, C. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527462
Steel, P., Svartdal, F., Thundiyil, T., & Brothen, T. (2018). Examining procrastination across multiple goal stages: A longitudinal study of temporal motivation theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(APR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00327
Sweet, E. (2021). Debt-Related Financial Hardship and Health. Health Education and Behavior, 48(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120976352
Van den Berg, I., Franken, I. H. A., & Muris, P. (2010). A new scale for measuring reward responsiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00239
Wolf, C., & Lappe, M. (2023). Motivation by reward jointly improves speed and accuracy, whereas task-relevance and meaningful images do not. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 85(3), 930–948. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02587-z
Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x
Xiao, J. J., & Porto, N. (2018). Present Bias and Financial Behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3257093
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marisa Lie, Bani Sahda Putra, Jimmy Sammuel Sulu, Miranda Tanjung

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)