Potential Words in Indonesian Language: Study of Generative Morphology

Authors

  • Ahmad Sirulhaq Universitas Mataram
  • Sukri Sukri Universitas Mataram
  • Syamsinas Jafar Universitas Mataram
  • Burhanuddin Burhanuddin Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8674

Keywords:

potential words, dictionary, affix, generative morphology, Indonesian language

Abstract

The research aimed to identify potential words in the Indonesian language and sought to explain why these words were not included in Indonesian vocabulary lists or were difficult to realize in natural conversations. In order to achieve these goals, data were collected using introspection, documentation, and interview methods. Furthermore, the collected data were analyzed using a generative morphology approach, mainly related to concepts of potential words. According to the approach, each language has (1) a List of Morphemes (LM), (2) Word Formation Rules (WFR), and (3) a Filter (F). WFR stated that every language was capable of producing new potential words, yet not all those potential words could easily pass through the filter to enter the lexicon of actual words used in real life. The potential words discussed in this research were restricted to those showing morpho-syntactic interconnection among Indonesian affixes. The results of this research indicate that numerous potential words in the Indonesian language are constructed out of such affixal interconnection. However, the potential words do not surface in the lexicon for two reasons: first, because the words fail to compete with others that compensate for their absence; second, because the words are difficult to manifest due to their low frequency in everyday speech.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

References

Ahmad, M. (2019). Perbandingan morfologi bahasa Ternate dan bahasa Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic Diversity and Local Wisdom, 1(1), 16-31.

Christensen, C. H. (2019). Arguments for and against the idea of universal grammar. Leviathan: Interdisciplinary Journal in English, 4, 12-28. https://doi.org/10.7146/lev.v0i4.112677.

Cook, V. J., & Newson, M. (2010). Chomsky’s universal grammar. USA: Blackwell Publishing.

Damayanti, R., Saleh, M., & Usman. (2021). Interferensi morfologi bahasa Indonesia dalam menulis teks narasi bahasa Bugis. Panrita: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Daerah serta Pembelajarannya, 2(1), 57-64.

Halle, M. (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(1), 3-16.

Johan, G. M., & Rindawati. (2018). Interferensi morfologis bahasa Simeulue dalam pembelajaran menulis karangan narasi pada siswa kelas V SD Negeri 10 Simeulue Tengah. Jurnal Metamorfosa, 6(1), 27-39.

Kaharuddin, M. N., Darwis, M., & Usman, M. (2019). Penguasaan kalimat bahasa Indonesia murid paud di kecamatan Tamalanrea kota Makassar: Kajian tranformasi generatif. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 7(2), 248-254.

Kim, J. J. (2018). A refutation of a universal grammar. Lingua, 210-211, 122-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.005.

Kusumastuti, D. (2017). Analisis kontrastif kopula bahasa Indonesia dengan bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 10(2), 25-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/jkp.v10i2.1517.

Lin, F. Y. (2017). A refutation of universal grammar. Lingua, 193, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.04.003.

Lin, F. Y. (2019). Methodological confusions in universal grammar: Reply to Kim. Lingua, 222, 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.02.008.

Mahsun (2017). Metode penelitian bahasa: Tahapan, strategi, metode, dan tekniknya. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Mirdayanti, I., Safa, N. A., & Kaharuddin, K. (2018). Analisis kontrastif pembentukan verba bahasa Arab dan bahasa Indonesia serta implikasinya dalam pembelajaran bahasa Arab. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 6(2), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.34050/jib.v6i2.5641.

Mutoharoh, M., Sulaeman, A., & Goziyah, G. (2018). Interferensi morfologi dalam karangan narasi mahasiswa Thailand semester IV Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, dan Asing, 1(1), 84-97. https://doi.org/10.31540/silamparibisa.v1i1.10.

Nasution, W., & Ramayanti, R. L. (2018). Interferensi morfologi bahasa Devayan terhadap bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Metamorfosa, 6(1), 73-83.

Operstein, N. (2018). Toward a typological profile of Lingua Franca: A view from the lexicon and word formation. Language Sciences, 66, 60-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.12.007.

Rofiq, A., & Afida, N. N. (2020). Interferensi morfologi bahasa Jawa ke dalam bahasa Indonesia pada tuturan dalam sinetron "Banyak Jalan Menuju Rhoma tingkat 2" di Indosiar. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 1(2), 82-101. https://doi.org/10.30739/tarbiyatuna.v1i02.680.

Setiadi, A. C. (2005). Pengajaran bahasa dengan pendekatan komunikatif: Analisis atas teori transformatif-generatif Noam Chomsky. At-Ta’dib, 4(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v4i1.569.

Simpen, I. (2008). Afiksasi bahasa Bali: Sebuah kajian morfologi generatif. Linguistika: Bu;etin Ilmiah Program Magister Linguistik Universitas Udayan, 15, 211-221.

Sutrisna, D. (2017). Analisis kesalahan morfologi bahasa Indonesia dalam surat kabar Radar Majalangka edisi 16 dan 25 April 2016. Jurnal Pendidikan, Kebahasaan, Dan Kesusastraan Indonesia, 1(1), 16-33.

Sutrisna, D., & Adawiyah, D. R. (2021). Analisis morfologi bahasa Indonesia dalam kumpulan puisi karya Sutardzi Calzoum Bachri. Jurnal Educatio, 7(3), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i3.965.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-21
Abstract 105  .
PDF downloaded 14  .