Factors Affecting Student Achievement in Faculty of Economics "X" University

Authors

  • Lily Suhaily Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya
  • Yasintha Soelasih Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v16i1.1540

Keywords:

education, achievement, parents, students

Abstract

Education is an important point for many countries, including Indonesia. People with high education in a country could make the country wealthier. Parents are usually aware that it is important for their children to be educated. If the children are well educated, they will increase the standard of living of their parents and their selves. Based on this phenomenon, research evaluated factors that influence student achievement and also evaluated the difference of achievement between students who are active in campus activities and are not active. A number of 329 questionnaires were distributed to Faculty of Economics, “X” University students using random sampling. The result shows that the students themselves as factor that could determine their achievement. The evaluation also found that the achievement of student who is active in campus activities is different with the achievement of student who is not active in campus activities.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biographies

Lily Suhaily, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Faculty of Economics

Yasintha Soelasih, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Faculty of Economics

References

Ali, A. (1983). Attitudes of Nigerian secondary school students towards school and their academic achiement in science. Journal of Nigerian Education, 3(2), 11–17.

Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (1999). “Using Maimonides” rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 533–576.

Atkinson, J. W. (1978). The Mainsprings of Achievement Oriented Activity. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Personality Motivation and Achievement (pp. 11–39). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Biegel, S. (2000). The interfaces between attandance, academic achievement, and equal educational opportunity. Northern District of California.

Buboltz, W., Brown, F., & Soper, B. (2001). Sleep habits and patterns of college students: A preliminary study. Journal of American College Health, 50(3), 131–135. http://doi.org/10.1080/07448480109596017

Burstall, C. (1970). French in the primary school: Some early findings. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2(1), 48–58. http://doi.org/10.1080/0022027700020107

Chung, C. J. (2004). The impact of attendance, instructor contact, and homework completion on achievement in a developmental logic course. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 20(2). Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-589967561/the-impact-of-attendance-instructor-contact-and

Cronbach, L. (1969). Heredity, environment, and educational policy. Harvard Educational Review, 39(2), 338–347. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.39.2.nvr226676j010551

Edwards, M. M. (1991). Building conditions, parental involvement, and student achievement in the D.C. Public school system. Georgetown University.

Ehrenberg, R. G., & Brewer, D. J. (1994). Do school and teacher characteristics matter? Evidence from High School and Beyond. Economics of Education Review, 13(1), 1–17.

Ferguson, R. F., & Ladd, H. F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding School Accountable: Performance–based Reform in Education (pp. 256–298). Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Flowers, C. E. (1966). Effects of an Arbitrary Accelerated Group Placement on the Tested Academic Achievement of Educationally Disadvantaged Students. Teachers College, Columbia University.

Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (1997). Why Don’t Schools and Teachers Seem to Matter? Assessing the Impact of Unobservables on Educational Productivity. Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 505–523.

Halawah, I. (2006). The effect of motivation, family environment, and student characteristics on academic achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(2), 91–99.

Hanushek, E. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 84–117.

Hoxby, C. (2000). The effects of class size on student achievement: New evidence from population variation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1239–1285.

Lee, P.-L., Hamman, D., & Lee, C. C. (2007). The relationship of family closeness with college students’ self-regulated learning and school adjustment. College Student Journal, 41(4), 779–787.

Lloyd, F., & Pidgeon, D. A. (1961). An investigation into the effect of coaching on non-verbal test materials with European, Indian and African children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 31(2), 145–151. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1961.tb02926.x

Murnane, R. J., Maynard, R. A., & Ohls, J. C. (1981). Home resources and children’s achievement. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(3), 369–377.

Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big fivecorrelates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 116–130.

Pidgeon, D. A. (1970). Expectation and Pupil Performance. NFER.

Strauss, M. A. (1951). Mental Ability and Cultural Needs – A Physho-Cultural Interpretation of Inteligence Test of Ceylon University Entrants. American Sociological Review, 16, 371–375.

Sunyoto, D. (2007). Analisis regresi dan kolerasi bivariat: Ringkasan dan kasus. Yogyakarta: Amara.

Watanabe, L. E., & Jasinski, J. (2005). The effects of college Student Employment on Academic Achievement. The University of Central Florida Undergraduate Research Journal, 1, 38–47. Retrieved from https://www.urj.ucf.edu/docs/urjmanuscript_watanabe_080509.pdf

Downloads

Published

2015-03-31
Abstract 558  .
PDF downloaded 325  .