Blockchain-Capabilities, Supply Chain Resilience, and Company Performance:

An Empirical Study in Indonesia and Switzerland

Authors

  • Darjat Sudrajat Bina Nusantara University (BINUS University)
  • Andre Kreie Kuehne Foundation
  • Engkos Achmad Kuncoro Bina Nusantara University
  • Adam Zulyiko Hakim Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v24i2.10486

Keywords:

blockchain capability, supplay chain resilience, company performance

Abstract

Alignment and agility are essential supply chain capabilities required to maintain and enhance performance, particularly in the current era of disruption. The research aimed to examine the impact of blockchain capabilities on supply chain resilience and company performance using quantitative and cross-sectional survey methods. Logistics service providers (LSP) were selected as the units of analysis, and individuals such as logisticians in Indonesia and Switzerland served as units of observation. Data were collected through an electronic questionnaire (Google Forms) using a quota sampling technique and analyzed using Smart-PLS software. The sample size included 60 respondents, comprising 45 and 15 from Indonesia and Switzerland based on the 10-times rule. The results show that supply chain resilience partially and fully mediated the impact of blockchain capabilities (supply chain alignment and agility) on LSPPerformance. LSP could also enhance performance and resilience by implementing blockchain technology to enhance supply chain alignment and agility. In theoretical terms, the results have implications contributing to dynamic capability theory. In practical applications, the research serves as valuable insights for government authorities and IT consultants when formulating effective plans and strategies to analyze the adoption of blockchain technology among LSP. Additionally, directors and owners of these companies are persuaded that blockchain has the potential to create and enhance supply chain capabilities, as well as increasing competitive advantage. 

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biography

Andre Kreie, Kuehne Foundation

Andre Kreie (PhD) is Director Global Logistics Education with the Kühne Foundation based in Schindellegi,
Switzerland. He is a Business Economist and holds a PhD and Masters in Logistics and Supply Chain
Management from Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK. Dr Kreie completed a professional multi-year
traineeship with a logistics company to understand and apply all operational procedures required in sea-,
air-, and land-transportation. Prior to joining the Kühne Foundation, Dr Kreie gained further work
experience in the supply chain business with a globally operating logistics service provider and worked as
project manager for logistics design and operations with a leading European DIY-retailer. Dr Kreie has
been teaching intensively in business programs at different universities and further education
institutions and his research interest is on organizational and network learning, and supply chain risk
management to enable the adaptations of logistical systems to a changing environment. Dr Kreie won
the International Emerald/EFDM Outstanding Doctoral Research Award for his PhD thesis on “The
Adaptation of Supply Chains to Climate Change”. In his current role, Dr. Kreie leads the LSCM Education
unit of the Kühne Foundation that addresses logistics and supply chain management topics as well as
leadership and strategic elements for academics as well as professionals. Present activities involve global
projects in higher education and vocational trainings with a particular focus on university capacity
building in logistics and supply chain management, i.e. Bachelor, Master, and PhD-Degree programs

References

Abeysekara, N., Wang, H., Kuruppuarachchi, D. (2019). Effect of supply-chain resilience on firm performance and competitive advantage. Business Process Management Journal, 25(7), 1673-1695. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-09-2018-0241.

Ahmad, R., Shahzad, K., Ishaq, M. I., & Aftab, J. (2023). Supply chain agility and firm performance: Testing serial mediations in pharmaceutical industry. Business Process Management Journal, 29(4), 991-1009. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2022-0586.

Ahmed, W., Najmi, A., & Khan, F. (2019). Examining the impact of institutional pressures and green supply chain management practices on firm performance. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(5), 1261-1283. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-06-2019-0115.

Anand, S. (2016). Execution Excellence: Making Strategy Work Using the Balanced Scorecard. Wiley.

Aslam, H., Blome, C., Roscoe, S., & Azhar, T. M. (2020). Determining the antecedents of dynamic supply chain capabilities. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(4), 427-442. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2019-0074.

Aslam, H., Blome, C., Roscoe, S., & Azhar, T. M. (2018). Dynamic supply chain capabilities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(12), 2266–2285. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2017-0555.

Azmi, N. Al, Sweis, G., Sweis, R., & Sammour, F. (2022). Exploring implementation of blockchain for the supply chain resilience and sustainability of the construction industry in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 14(11), 6427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116427.

Baah, C., Agyeman, D. O., Acquah, I. S. K., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Issau, K., …Faibil, D. (2022). Effect of information sharing in supply chains: Understanding the roles of supply chain visibility, agility, collaboration on supply chain performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(2), 434-455. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2020-0453.

Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2020). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (8th Ed.). Wiley.

Chowdhury, M. M. H., Quaddus, M., Agarwal, R. (2019). Supply chain resilience for performance: Role of relational practices and network complexities. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(5), 659-676. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0332.

Chu, Y., Chi, M., Wang, W., Luo, B. (2019). The impact of information technology capabilities of manufacturing enterprises on innovation performance: Evidences from SEM and fsQCA. Sustainability, 11(21), 5946. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215946

Dormady, N., Roa-Henriquez, A., & Rose, A. (2017). The resilience of the firm: A production theory approach. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3042815.

Dubey, R., Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Blome, C., Papadopoulos, T., & Childe, S. J. (2018). Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(1), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2016-0173.

Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13, 215-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7.

Feizabadi, J., Maloni, M., & Gligor, D. (2019). Benchmarking the triple-A supply chain: Orchestrating agility, adaptability, and alignment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(1), 271-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2018-0059.

Gligor, D., Gligor, N., Holcomb, M., &Bozkurt, S. (2019). Distinguishing between the concepts of supply chain agility and resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2), 467-487. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-10-2017-0259.

Guan, W., Ding, W., Zhang, B., & Verny, J. (2023). The role of supply chain alignment in coping with resource dependency in blockchain adoption: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 36(2), 605-628 https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-11-2021-0491

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Black, W. C., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th Ed.). Cengage.

Hair Jr., J., Page, M., Brunsveld, N. (2019). Essentials of Business Research Methods (4th Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203374.

Hair Jr., J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd Ed.). SAGE Publishing.

Hamidu, Z., Issau, K., Boachie-Mensah, F. O., Asafo-Adjei, E. (2023). On the interplay of supply chain network complexity on the nexus between supply chain resilience and performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2022-0551.

Hendijani, R., & Norouzi, M. (2023). Supply chain integration and firm performance in the COVID-19 era: The mediating role of resilience and robustness. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 16(2), 337-367. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-03-2022-0022.

Ivanov, D. (2022). Viable supply chain model: Integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Operation Research, 319, 1411-1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03640-6.

Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829-846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086.

Juan, S. -J., Li, E. Y., & Hung, W. -H. (2022). An integrated model of supply chain resilience and its impact on supply chain performance under disruption. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(1), 339-364. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-03-2021-0174.

Lambourdiere, E., & Corbin, E. (2020). Blockchain and maritime supply-chain performance: Dynamic capabilities perspective. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 12(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-10-2019-0069.

Li, Z.-P., Ceong, H.-T., & Lee, S.-J. (2021). The effect of blockchain operation capabilities on competitive performance in supply chain management. Sustainability, 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112078.

Liu, C.-L., Lee, M.-Y., 2018. Integration, supply chain resilience, and service performance in third-party logistics providers. The International Journal of Logistics Management 29(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2016-0283.

Kegiatan bisnis logistik turun 50% akibat pandemi COVID-19. (2020, April 21), CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20200421112727-19-153326/kegiatan-bisnis-logistik-turun-50-akibat-pandemi-covid-19

Min, H. (2019). Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience. Business Horizons, 62(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.012.

Mukherjee, S., Baral, M. M., Nagariya, R., Chittipaka, V., & Pal, S. K. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based supply chain resilience for improving firm performance in emerging markets. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-06-2022-0049.

Patrucco, A. S., Kähkönen, A. -K. (2021). Agility, adaptability, and alignment: New capabilities for PSM in a post-pandemic world. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100719.

Pettit, T. J., Croxton, K. L., Fiksel, J. (2019). The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: A retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12202.

Polater, A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities in humanitarian supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 11(1), 46-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-10-2020-0089.

Qi, Y., Huo, B., Wang, Z., & Yeung, H. Y. J., (2017). The impact of operations and supply chain strategies on integration and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 162-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.028.

Queiroz, M. M., Telles, R., & Bonilla, S. H. (2019). Blockchain and supply chain management integration: A systematic review of the literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(2), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0143.

Raval, S. J., Kant, R., & Shankar, R. (2020). Analyzing the Lean Six Sigma enabled organizational performance to enhance operational efficiency. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(8), 2401-2434. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2019-0221.

Ruan, T., Gu, Y., Li, X., & Qu, R. (2022). Research on the practical path of resource-based enterprises to improve environmental efficiency in digital transformation. Sustainability, 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113974.

Salam, M. A., & Bajaba, S. (2023). The role of supply chain resilience and absorptive capacity in the relationship between marketing–supply chain management alignment and firm performance: A moderated-mediation analysis. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(7), 1545-1561. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2022-0105.

Salisu, Y., & Abu Bakar, L. J. (2019). Technological capability, relational capability and firms’ performance. Revista de Gestão, 27(1), 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-03-2019-0040.

Schuster, R., Nath, G., Rodriguez, P., O’Brien, P., Aylor, B., Sidopoulos, B., …Datta, B. (2021, July 29). Real-world supply chain resilience. BCG. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2021/building-resilience-strategies-to-improve-supply-chain-resilience.

Shakil, M. H., Mahmood, N., Tasnia, M., & Munim, Z. H. (2019). Do environmental, social and governance performance affect the financial performance of banks? A cross-country study of emerging market banks. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(6), 1331-1344. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2018-0155.

Shani, O. (2020). Organizational resilience: Antecedents, consequences, and practical implications – for managers and change leaders*. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 127-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0897-301620200000028005.

Sheel, A., & Nath, V. (2019). Effect of blockchain technology adoption on supply chain adaptability, agility, alignment and performance. Management Research Review, 42(12), 1353-1374. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-12-2018-0490.

Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2018). Complementarities in supply chain collaboration. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 17(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2018.17.1.030.

Skipworth, H., Godsell, J., Wong, C. Y., Saghiri, S., & Julien, D. (2015). Supply chain alignment for improved business performance: an empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(5), 511-533. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2014-0188.

Sousa-Zomer, T. T., Neely, A., & Martinez, V. (2020). Digital transforming capability and performance: A microfoundational perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(7/8), 1095-1128. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2019-0444.

Sundjaja, A. M. (2018). What Indonesia’s museum visitor needs in digital era? 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech). IEEE, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2018.8528098.

World Bank, (2023). Global Ranking 2023. https://lpi.worldbank.org/international/global

Zhou, H., Wang, Q., Li, L., Teo, T. S. H., & Yang, S. (2023). Supply chain digitalization and performance improvement: A moderated mediation model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28(6), 993-1008. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2022-0434.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-22

How to Cite

Sudrajat, D., Kreie, A., Kuncoro, E. A., & Hakim, A. Z. (2023). Blockchain-Capabilities, Supply Chain Resilience, and Company Performance: : An Empirical Study in Indonesia and Switzerland. Journal The Winners, 24(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v24i2.10486

Issue

Section

Dig. Trans. from Supply Chain and Operation Perspective in Developing Countries
Abstract 265  .
PDF downloaded 189  .