An Ecolinguistic Study on Ecospiritual Tourism of Rebo Buntung Commoddification

Authors

  • Diah Supatmiwati Universitas Bumigora
  • Wiya Suktiningsih Universitas Bumigora
  • Sutarman Universitas Bumigora
  • Zainudin Abdussamad Universitas Bumigora
  • Abdul Muhid Universitas Bumigora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v15i2.7497

Keywords:

study, ecospiritual tourism, commodification

Abstract

The research examined the relationship between cultural ritual, linguistic, and ecology in the context of ecotourism. It aimed to encourage, stimulate, and integrate the use of religious tradition’s terms in understanding and reinterpreting the environment and human relations and its roles. Cultural forms and elements basically had the potential to be used as a tourism commodity, meaning that they could be commodified. The research also related to ecolinguistics, a study that discussed language associated with the environment in which the language grew and developed and how it was used by the community. Cultural rituals as a tourism commodity could be a means of maintaining culture and language even though they were commodified for tourism purposes. Thus, the religious-cultural structure of Rebo Buntung and Tetulaq Tamperan should be packaged following its original structure as a medium for cultural and language preservation but also packaged as attractively as possible with a contextual structure that adapted to tourism sites so that could attract tourists. This ecospiritual commodification was expected to be able to budge the economy of the surrounding community. The research was conducted at Ketapang Beach, Tanjung Menangis, Pringgabaya district, and East Lombok where Rebo Buntung ritual was carried out. The research applied a qualitative descriptive method. For this reason, the data obtained were analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis by describing the data obtained from an informant. On that basis, it can be concluded that the practice of ecospriritual commodification can have multiple effects, not only to preserve culture and language but also to maintain community harmony with nature, as well as improve the economy of the local community.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biographies

Diah Supatmiwati, Universitas Bumigora

English Literature Department

Sutarman, Universitas Bumigora

Farmacy Department

Zainudin Abdussamad, Universitas Bumigora

English Literature Department

Abdul Muhid, Universitas Bumigora

English Literature Department

References

Acquaviva, P., Lenci, A., Paradis, C., & Rafaelli, I. (2020). Models of lexical meaning. In Word Knowledge and Word Usage (pp. 353-404). Dressler, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110440577-010.

Arida, I. N. S. (2017). Pengembangan, partisipasi lokal, dan tantangan ekowisata. Denpasar: Cakra Press.

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (2017). Kamus Sasak Indonesia. Nusa Tenggara Barat: Kantor Bahasa Nusa Tenggara Barat.

Boada, A. B. (2017). The ecology of language contact: Minority and majority languages. In A. Fill & H. Penz (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. London: Routledge.

Chen, S. (2016). Language and ecology: A content analysis of ecolinguistics as an emerging research field. Ampersand, 3, 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2016.06.002.

Choe, J., & O’Regan, M. (2020). Faith manifest: Spiritual and mindfulness tourism in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Religions, 11(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11040177.

Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(88)90028-X.

Cowell, S., & Jenks, K. (2021). Beloved things: Interpreting curated pottery in diasporic contexts. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 25(2), 448-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-020-00560-w.

Direktorat Jenderal Pengelolaan Ruang Laut. (2019). Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan. Retrieved from https://kkp.go.id/djprl/artikel/874-laporkan-2-590-pulau-bernama-ke-pbb-pulau-indonesia-yang-bernama-kini-berjumlah-16-056.

Dwihapsari, N. (2016). Kajian pola perilaku wisatawan Tiongkok di klenteng Sam Poo Kong. Bandung: Universitas Padjadjaran.

Erwin, J., & Smith Z. A. (2008). Globalization: A reference handbook. California: ABC-CLIO.

Febriyani, P., Bagiya., & Ratnaningsih, A. (2021). Analisis kesalahan kebahasaan pada buku tematik tema 5 Pahlawanku kelas IV sekolah dasar. De_Journal: Dharmas Education Journal, 2(1), 72-78.

Haugen, E. (1972). The ecology of language. California: Standford University Press.

Isti’anah, A. (2020). Criticizing Yogyakarta environment on the official website of Indonesian tourism: An ecolinguistic study. Leksema: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v5i1.2023.

Kardana, I. N., Mahayana, I. M. A., & Rajistha, I. G. N. A. (2020). The dynamics of Balinese lexicon in Sanur tourism area: An ecolinguistic approach. International Linguistics Research, 3(4), 142-51. https://doi.org/10.30560/ilr.v3n4p142.

Li, J., Steffensen, S. V., & Huang, G. (2020). Rethinking ecolinguistics from a distributed language perspective. Language Sciences, 80, 101277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101277.

Noh, M., N, A., Razzaq, A. R., Mustafa, M. Z., Nordin, M. N., & Ibrahim, B. (2020). Sustainable community based ecotourism developement. Palarch’s Journal of Archeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(9), 5049-5061.

Norman, A., & Pokorny, J. J. (2017). Meditation retreats: Spiritual tourism well-being interventions. Tourism Management Perspectives, 24, 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.07.012.

Park, E., Choi, B. K., & Lee, T. J. (2019). The role and dimensions of authenticity in heritage tourism. Tourism Management, 74, 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.03.001.

Shepherd, R. (2002). Commodification, culture, and tourism. Tourist Studies, 2(2), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F146879702761936653.

Silalahi, M. (2019). Lexical items in Batak Toba language representing fauna, flora, and social environment: Ecolinguistics study. Haluan Sastra Budaya, 3(1), 74-85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/hsb.v3i1.30204.

Sukaatmadja, I. P. G., Wardana, M., Purbawangsa, I. B. A., & Rahanatha, G. B. (2017). Pariwisata spriritual: Berbasis event-event upacara agama Hindu. Prosiding Seminar Nasional AIMI. Jakarta, Indonesia. pp 27-28. Retrieved from https://repository.unja.ac.id/3863/57/529_538.pdf.

Suktiningsih, W. (2016). Leksikon fauna masyarakat Sunda: Kajian ekolinguistik. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 2(1), 138-156. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/jr.2.1.54.142-160.

Ulinnuha, H., & Lutfia, N. S. (2021). Balinese rituals & language: Facing globalization (part 2). Retrieved July 9, 2021 from https://tourism.binus.ac.id/2020/12/14/balinese-rituals-language-facing-globalisation-part-2/.

Xu, D., Pearce, P. L., & Chen, T. (2021). Deconstructing tourist scams: A social-practice-theory perspective. Tourism Management, 82, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104186.

Yuniawan, T., Rokhman, F., Rustono, R., & Mardikantoro, H. B. (2017). The study of critical eco-linguistic in green discourse: Prospective eco-linguistic analysis. Jurnal Humaniora, 29(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v29i3.27441.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-30
Abstract 464  .
PDF downloaded 440  .