Perancangan Model Evaluasi Diri Dosen

Authors

  • Agustina Tutik Fakultas Ekonomi Jurusan Manajemen, UBiNus, Jakarta
  • Synthia Atas Sari Fakultas Ekonomi Jurusan Manajemen, UBiNus, Jakarta
  • Hartiwi Prabowo Fakultas Ekonomi Jurusan Manajemen, UBiNus, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v7i2.616

Keywords:

lecturer, self evaluation

Abstract

Article present lecturer self evaluation model as complement for IKAD (Lecturer Performance Academic Index). This research used action research analysis and technique of data collecting by library research, discussion by lecturer from any faculty and major, preview the duty and obligation of UBiNus lecturer. Variables and wight for this model are learning (30%), professionalism (20%), research (20%), technology and
computer (15%), team work (10%), and services to University (5%)

 

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

References

Dressler, Gary. 2003. Human Resource Management. 9th Edition. Prentice Hall.

Evans, Lindsay. 2002. The Management and Control of Quality. 5th Edition. Thompson Learning.

McNiff, Jean. 1995. Action Research for Professional Development. 11th Edition. Hyde Publication, UK.

Seldin, P. 1984. Changing Practices in Faculty Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Tampubolon, Daulat P. 2001. Perguruan Tinggi Bermutu: Paradigma Baru Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi Menghadapi Tantangan Abad 21. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

University of Sydney. Annual Activities Evaluation (AAE) Form. 2001.

Downloads

Published

2006-10-01

How to Cite

Tutik, A., Sari, S. A., & Prabowo, H. (2006). Perancangan Model Evaluasi Diri Dosen. Journal The Winners, 7(2), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v7i2.616
Abstract 507  .
PDF downloaded 656  .