Personal and Communal Assumptions to Determine Pragmatic Meanings of Phatic Functions

Authors

  • Kunjana Rahardi Universitas Sanata Dharma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v10i2.897

Keywords:

phatic function, education domain, pragmatic context, assumptions

Abstract

This research was meant to describe the manifestations of phatic function in the education domain. The phatic function in the communication and interaction happening in the education domain could be accurately identified when the utterances were not separated from their determining pragmatic context. The context must not be limited only to contextual and social or societal perspectives, but must be defined as basic assumptions. The data of this research included various kinds of speech gathered naturally in education circles that contain phatic functions. Two methods of data gathering were employed in this study, namely listening and conversation methods. Recorded data was analyzed through the steps as follows (1) data were identified based on the discourse markers found (2) data were classified based on the phatic perception criteria; (3) data were interpreted based on the referenced theories; (4) data were described in the form of analysis result description. The research proves that phatic function in the form of small talks in the education domain cannot be separated from the context surrounding it.

 

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biography

Kunjana Rahardi, Universitas Sanata Dharma

Ketua Program Magister (S-2) Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta

References

Arimi,S. (1998). Basi-basi dalam Masyarakat Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UGM.

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kridalaksana, H. (1994). Kelas Kata dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Pranowo. (2015). Tergantung pada Konteks. In Optimalisasi

Fungsi Bahasa Indonesia sebagai Wahana Pembentukan Mental dan Karakter Bangsa di Era Globalisasi Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045 pp. 489-502. Pranowo et al. (Eds.). Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Rahardi, R. K. (2005). Pragmatik: Kesantunan imperatif bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rahardi, R. K. (2009). Sosiopragmatik. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rahardi, R. K. (2015). Menemukan hakikat konteks. In Kajian Pragmatik dalam Berbagai Perspektif pp.17-22. Haryato et al. (Eds.). Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana UNS.

Rahardi, R. K., Setyaningsih, Y., Dewi, R. P. (2014). Impoliteness category in Javanese Royal Family. In Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Indonesia dalam Pengembangan Profesionalisme pp. 309-314. Anshari et al. (Eds.). Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Rahardi, R. K., Setyaningsih, Y., Dewi, R. P. (2015a). Pragmatik: Fenomena ketidaksantunan berbahasa. Yogyakarta: Keppel Press.

Rahardi, R. K., Setyaningsih, Y., Dewi, R. P.(2015b). Kata fatis penanda ketidaksantunan pragmatik dalam ranah keluarga. Adabiyyat, 13(2), 149-175.

Rahardi, R. K., Setyaningsih, Y., Dewi, R. P.(2015c). Mencari identitas konteks (dalam studi) pragmatik. In Optimalisasi Fungsi Bahasa Indonesia sebagai Wahana Pembentukan Mental dan Karakter Bangsa di Era Globalisasi Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045

pp. 324-329. Pranowo et al. (Eds.). Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Stalnaker, R.C. (1974). Pragmatic presupposition.in Munitz, M.K. & D.K. Unger (Eds.). Semantics and philosophy. New York: New York University Press.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-30
Abstract 1243  .
PDF downloaded 616  .