Strengthening Student Character with Local Cultural Metaphors: Messages Exploration from the Tiba Meka Dance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v15i2.7340Keywords:
character-building, metaphor construction, people ideology, pedagogic values, tiba meka danceAbstract
The research aimed to analyze the metaphor constructions and pedagogic values in the tiba meka dance. Students’ character building through metaphor construction in traditional dance had not been widely investigated; meanwhile, the metaphors used in this dance contain great values for encouraging students’ positive attitudes. Metaphor construction had a fundamental role for the students to have creative thought and deepen their understanding of its nature and role as a real communication language. The proper metaphor’s construction encouraged a student to be a catalyst in cross-cultural communication and appreciated the values contained in the metaphor delivered. The research was carried out between February and December 2019 and involved 30 respondents. The instruments used in collecting data were a set of stationery, questionnaire, interview, documentation, field notes, and recordings. These data were analyzed qualitatively through the phenomenological method. The findings show that the tiba meka dance is inseparable from the use of metaphors, namely bird, vegetation, body, sun, and water metaphors that have great pedagogic values, such as honesty, responsibility, and disciplin that contribute to the character building for students. The ideologies that underline tiba meka dance are morals, identity, and economy.
Plum Analytics
References
Abdullah, I., Hudayana, B., Setiadi, S., Kutanegara, P. M., & Indiyanto, A. (2019). Beyond school reach: Character education in three schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 9(3), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesr-2019-0032.
Ahmady, S., Yaghmaei, M., Arab, M., & Monajemi, A. (2016). Metaphor in education: Hidden but effective. Journal of Medical Education Winter, 15(1), 52-57. https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v15i1.10401.
Alhusban, A. M., & Alkhawaldah, M. (2018). Meaning construction of selected Quranic metaphors. International Journal of Linguistics, 10(6), 134-148. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v10i6.13827.
Amin, I. M., Mansur, R., & Sulistiono, M. (2020). Peran literasi digital dalam meningkatkan pembelajaran pendidikan agama islam di kelas XI IIS 01 SMAI AL Maarif Singosari Malang. Vicratina: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 58-67.
Brugman, B., Burgers, C., & Vis, B. (2019). Metaphorical framing in political discourse through words vs. concepts: A meta-analysis. Language and Cognition, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.5.
Bungin, B. (2005). Metode penelitian kuanlitatif: Komunikasi, ekonomi, kebijakan publik, dan ilmu sosial lainnya (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Cavalaro, D. (2001). Critical and cultural theory. New York: The Athlone Press.
Chowdhury, M. (2016). Emphasizing morals, values, ethics, and character education in science education and science teaching. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 1-16.
Creed, A., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Metaphor identification as a research method for the study of career. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 28, 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-017-9345-2.
Díaz-Peralta, M. (2018). Metaphor and ideology: Conceptual structure and conceptual content in Spanish political discourse. Discourse & Communication, 12(2), 128-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317745752.
Ellemers, N., Toorn, J. V. D., Paunov, Y., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2019). The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies published from 1940 through 2017. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 332-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318811759.
Hani’ah., Widodo, S., Suwandi, S., Saddhono, K., & Mohamad, B. (2019). Investigating the traditional proverbs and their impact on cultural identity and communication: Lessons from the Madurese community. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(5), 846-857.
Haryanto, H., & Akhirin, A. (2018). Building students’ character through integrated teaching learning activities at Madrassa. Proceeding of International Conference: Internationalization of Islamic Higher Education Institutions Toward Global Competitiveness. Semarang, Indonesia. pp. 518-526.
Herman, R. N., Mukhlis, M., Parlindungan, F., Lisyati, L., & Nuthihar, R. (2020). Character education in an Acehese cultural saga: Hikayat Prang Sabi. Lingua Cultura, 14(2), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v14i2.6623.
Hoque, M. E. (2016). Three domains of learning: Cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The Journal of EFL Education and Research, 2(2), 45-52.
Istiqomah, D. M. (2019). Student character building on metaphor in Raja Ali Haji’s and Robert Herrick’s poems. ELLITE: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 4(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.32528/ellite.v4i1.2314.
Ivanovic, I. (2017). Comparative study of metaphor in British and United States of America (US) political discourse. XLinguae Journal, 10(2), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2017.10.02.02.
Jama, K. B., Ardika, I. W., Ardhana, I. K., Setiawan, I. K., & Menggo, S. (2020). Metaphor construction in caci performance of Manggarai speech community. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 418-426. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1103.10.
Kelly, L. H. (2016). Critical metaphor analysis of cosmetics metaphorical advertising slogan: A cross-cultural perspective. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 3(1), 134-150. https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.3.1.07hai.
Kendenan, E. S. (2017). Simile & metaphor in translation: A study on students’ translation of Amy Tan’s “two kinds” short story. Launguage Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 11(2), 106-116. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v11i2.9583.
Kitis, E., & Milapides, M. (1997). Read it and believe it: How metaphor constructs ideology in news discourse, a case study. Journal of Pragmatics, 28(5), 557-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00075-1.
Lai, V. T., Howerton, O., & Desai, R. H. (2019). Concrete processing of action metaphors: Evidence from ERP. Brain Research, 1714, 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2019.03.005.
Lang, J. (2020). Neological cancer metaphors in the Chinese cyberspace. Chinese Language and Discourse, 11(2), 261-286. https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.19014.lan.
Lee, J., Choi, J. Y., & Marqués-Pascual, L. (2016). An analysis of communicative language functions in the speech patterns of bilingual Korean and Mexican immigrant children. Journal of New Approach in Educational Research, 5(2), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2016.7.193.
Mansur, M. (2020). Membangun karakter siswa melalui kearifan lokal. Jurnal Pusaka, 1(1), 22-33.
Mason, L. (2018). A critical metaphor analysis of educational technology research in the social studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18(3), 538-555.
McKinnon, A. M. (2013). Ideology and the market metaphor in rational choice theory of religion: A rhetorical critique of ‘religious economies’. Critical Sociology, 39(4), 529-543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511415431.
Menggo, S. (2017). Budaya lonto léok dalam kemampuan berbicara bahasa Inggris. In The 1st International Conference on Language, Literature and Teaching (pp. 764-772). Surakarta: Graduate Program of Language Study, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Retrieved from https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id.
Menggo, S. (2018). English learning motivation and speaking ability. Journal of Psychology and Instruction, 2(2), 64-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpai.v2i2.15979.
Menggo, S., & Suastra, I. . M. (2020). Language use and language attitudes of Sumbawanese speakers in Bali. Register Journal, 13(2), 333-350. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i2.333-350.
Menggo, S., Suastra, I. M., Budiarsa, M., & Padmadewi, N. N. (2019). Speaking for academic purposes course: An analysis of language functions. E-Journal of Linguistics, 13(2), 314-332. https://doi.org/10.24843/e-jl.2019.v13.i02.p10.
Muassomah, M., Abdullah, I., Istiadah, I., Mujahidin, A., Masnawi, N., & Sohrah, S. (2020). Believe in literature: Character education for Indonesia’s youth. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 2223-2231. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080605,
Müller, M. (2018). ‘Brandspeak’: Metaphors and the rhetorical construction of internal branding. Sage Journal, 25(1), 42-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417710831.
Ndiung, S. (2017). Ritus ‚tiba meka’ orang Manggarai dalam kajian etnopedagogi. In The Ist International Conference On Language, Literature and Teaching (pp. 776-794). Surakarta: Graduate Program of Language Study, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Ndiung, S., & Bayu, G. W. (2019). Ritus tiba meka orang Manggarai dan relevansinya dengan nilai-nilai karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Multikultural Indonesia, 2(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpmu.v2i1.20786.
Negro, I., Šorm, E., & Steen, G. (2018). General image understanding in visual metaphor identification. ODISEA: Revista De Estudios Inglesesngleses, 18, 113-131. https://doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i18.1900.
Nurhaida, N., & Marlina, L. (2017). An analysis of figurative language in views (opinion column) of online Padang Ekspres newspaper. English Language and Literature: Online Journal, 6(2), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v6i1.8547.
Otoo, R. (2017). Metaphorical extensions of Ye (eat) verb: The case of Gᾶ. International Journal of Linguistics, 9(6), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v9i6.12104.
Padillah, E. N., Firmawan, H., & Purwaningsih, E. (2016). Simile, hyperbole, personafication, and metaphor used in Gayle Forman’s if I stay. Jurnal Ilmiah Sastra, 4(1), 69-78.
Pandor, P. (2018). Kontribusi teori ujaran dan tindakan bahasa dalam filsafat analitik John Langshaw Austin terhadap bahasa pewartaan. Seri Filsafat Teologi Widya Sasana, 28(27), 173-195.
Pandor, P. (2020). Pendidikan karakter sebagai solusi atas fenomena Mcdonalisasi pendidikan dalam era revolusi industri 4.0. Psiko-Edukasi, 18(1), 1-17.
Ponterotto, D. (2007). Conceptual metaphor and text development: A narratological perspective. Culture, Lenguage, and Representation, 5, 59-73. http://doi.org/10.6035/CLR.
Roselani, N. G. A. (2020). I am falling in love, Ouch!: Ontological metaphors at work. Lingua Cultura, 14(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v14i1.6343.
Sari, C. P., Zainiyati, H. S., & Hana, R. Al. (2020). Building students’ character through prophetic education at Madrasa. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v6i1.6380.
Shuangyun, Y., & Hongxia, L. (2020). Knowledge mapping of ethnic identity and acculturation based on the method of bibliometric. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(3), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/370.
Sönmez, V. (2017). Association of cognitive, affective, psychomotor, and intuitive domains in education, Sönmez Model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050307.
St. Clair, R. N. (2004). Visual metaphor, cultural knowledge, and the new rhetoric. In Learn in beauty: Indigenous education for a new century. Arizona: Northern Arizona State University.
Sua, A. T., Anshari, A., & Maman, M. (2017). The form, function, and value of Buginese utterances of Bone society. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(5), 928-933. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0805.12.
Sukri, S., Duile, T. M., & Daud, R. (2020). Adat as a local ideology of indigenous people in political event. ETNOSIA: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 5(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.31947/etnosia.v5i1.9705.
Sunil, S., & Verma, S. K. (2018). Moral identity and its links to ethical ideology and civic engagement. Journal of Human Values, 24(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685818754547.
Surip, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2019). Conceptual metaphor in human communication. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education, 2(4), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v2i4.498.
Susamto, D. A. (2018). Konstruksi sosial pepatah tradisional dan aturan adat untuk keseimbangan ekologi. Totobuang Journal, 6(1), 47-58.
Swami, Y. (2020). Rituals for social communication in folk theatre of Rajasthan with special reference to performance of Jagdev kankaali. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(1), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n1.13.
Tay, D. (2017). Exploring the metaphor–body–psychotherapy relationship. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(3), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1338021.
Thamrin, T. (2018). The language attitudes of Minangkabau people towards Minangkabau and Indonesian language. International Journal of Language Teaching and Education, 2(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.22437/ijolte.v2i2.5065.
Thibodeau, P., Matlock, T., & Flusberg, S. J. (2019). The role of metaphor in communication and thought. Linguistics and Language Compass, 13(5), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12327.
Tseng, M. (2017). Primary metaphors and multimodal metaphors of food: Examples from an intercultural food design event. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(3), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1338027.
Veliz, L. (2017). Enhancing ESL learners’ vocabulary learning of metaphorically-used words. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(5), 835-846. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0805.01.
Vengadasamy, R. (2011). Metaphors as ideological constructs for identity in Malaysian short stories. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 17(Special Issue), 99-107.
Venkatesan, S., & Saji, S. (2020). Reflections on the visceral: Metaphors and illness experience. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n1.12.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Sebastianus Menggo, Pius Pandor, Sabina Ndiung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)