EFL Teacher’s Beliefs about Sociolinguistic Competence:
A Qualitative Case Study in Indonesian Formal English Pedagogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v15i2.6825Keywords:
teachers' beliefs, sociolinguistic competence, EFL pedagogoyAbstract
The research aimed to explore beliefs of sociolinguistic competence from Indonesian EFL (English as a Foreign Language) teachers. Two teachers were carefully chosen to participate in the research. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, analyzed, and interpreted using the critical descriptive method. The research finds that EFL teachers express their beliefs in various terms, ideologies, and perspectives. The result indicates that the EFL teachers’ beliefs about sociolinguistic competence are equivalent to the concepts of spatial repertoire, principled-polycentrism, resourceful speakers, and sociolinguistics as mobility. It also indicates that EFL teachers’ pedagogical affordances in determining learning objectives, selecting materials and media for learning, implementing classroom strategies, and choosing appropriate evaluation for their teaching are influenced by their beliefs of sociolinguistic competence. The research suggests that Indonesian EFL teachers should be awarded the freedom to develop sociolinguistic competence based on their classroom context and learners’ heterogeneity. With the presence of a national curriculum (known as K13) that gives more spaces for sociolinguistic competence to take place, teachers should transform their paradigm of seeing classroom interaction in EFL classroom to be more sociolinguistically-aware to transform the static, pre-determined, and motionless definition of sociolinguistic competence to a more dynamic, fluid, and varying. These transformations can be made by imparting sociolinguistic competence in teachers’ education and teachers’ professional development programs.
Plum Analytics
References
Anvarovna, Z. S. (2017). Principles of improving sociolinguistic competence among students of philological faculties of higher educational institutions when teaching the german language. Asian Journal of Research, 11(11), 81-91.
Baralt, M., & Gómez, J. M. (2017). Task-based language teaching online: A guide for teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 28-43.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistic of globalization. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Blommaert, J. (2014). From mobility to complexity in sociolinguistic theory and method. In N. Coupland (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. London: Cambridge University Press.
Canagarajah, S. (2017). Translingual practice as spatial repertoire: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx041.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Lingustics, 1(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1.
Darmajanti, P. (2018). The development of intractional competence of EFL learners. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 145, 180-183. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iconelt-17.2018.40.
Estaji, M., Rahimi, A. (2018). Exploring teachers’ perception of intercultural communicative competence and their practices for teaching culture in EFL classrooms. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 6(2), 1-18.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gorter, D., & Arocena, E. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism in a course on translanguaging. System, 92, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102272.
Jenkins. J. (2015). Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca. Englishes in Practice 2(3), 49-85. https://doi.org/10.1515/eip-2015-0003.
Kim, S. L. (2021). A review of the literature on teachers’ beliefs about English language learners. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100040.
Lesenciuc, S., & Lesenciuc, A. (2017). The need of designing the sociolinguistic competence in Romanian preschool education for future development of intercultural competence. International Conference RCIC’17. Bari, Italia. Pp. 23-30.
Li, G. (2020). Principles for developing learner agency in language learning in a new eduscape with COVID-19. Language Learning, 5, 30-40.
Lie, A. (2017). English and identitiy in Multicultural contexts: issues, challenges and opportunities. TEFLIN Journal: A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 28(1), 71-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v28i1/71-92.
Littlewood, W. (2013). Developing a context-sensitive pedagogy for communication-oriented language teaching. English Teaching, 68(3), 3-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.15858/engtea.68.3.201309.3.
Maestre, J. T., & Gindidis, M. (2016). Teachers’ beliefs, practices, and challenges in using communicative language teaching (CLT) in an ESL context in the Philippines. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Language Learning. Kobe, Japan. Pp. 1-14.
Munandar, M. I., & Newton, J. (2021) Indonesian EFL teachers’ pedagogic beliefs and classroom practices regarding culture and interculturality. Language and Intercultural Communication, 21(2), 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1867155.
Pennycook, A. (2008). Translingual English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 30.1-30.9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2104/aral0830.
Pennycook, A. (2014). Principled polycentrism and resourceful speakers. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 11(4), 1-19.
Putra, E. R. (2019). Teacher’s knowledge about sociolinguistics in EFL pedagogy: A study from classroom implementation of curriculum 2013. ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teachin in Foreign Language Context, 4(2), 122-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v4i2.5265.
Rahman, M. M., Singh, M. K. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). Exploring ESL teacher beliefs and classroom practices of CLT: A case study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 295-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11121a.
Renandya, W., Hamied, F. A., & Nurkamto, J. (2018). English language proficiency in Indonesia: Issues and prospects. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(3), 566-899. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.4.618.
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., Gallo, P. G., Renandya, W. A. (2002). Exploring teachers’ beliefs and the processes of change. PAC Journal, 1(1), 41-58.
Sarimsakova, D. (2021). Developing the sociolinguistic competence of future English teachers through the use of case studies. Mental Enlightenment-Methodological Journal, 2(7), 54-65. https://www.doi.org/10.51348/tziuj202127.
Savignon, S. J. (2006). Beyond communicative language teaching: What’s ahead? Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 207-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.09.004.
Tanasale, I. O. (2017). Translingual practice: Weaving native cultures to a writing classroom. Proceeding of Indonesia Focus, 1(1), 13-18.
Tootkaboni, A. A. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs and practices towards communicative language teaching in the expanding circle. Revista Signos: Estudios de Lingüística, 52(100), 265-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342019000200265.
Xamidullaevna, X. N. (2020). Status of sociolinguistic competence within models of communicative competence. PJAEE 17(6), 7319-7326.
Zaenul, F. (2016). Teacher’s politeness strategy in efl classroom and the effects on the learning process (A case study at SMA Mardhatillah NW Penakak in the school year 2014/2015). Journal Ilmiah Rinjani: Media Informasi Ilmiah Universitas Gunung Rinjani, 4(1), 94-99.
Zaid, A. (2014). Teaching sociolinguistic competence to English learners in Indonesia. In The 61st TEFLIN International Conference UNS Solo 2014. Solo, Indonesia. Pp. 431-433.
Zhang, H., & Wang. N. (2016). Sociolinguistics and English teaching in China. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(4), 830-834. https://doi.org/10.17507/TPLS.0604.21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Edi Ramawijaya Putra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)