Role of Desire and Implementation of Intention in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v13i1.7898Keywords:
desire, implementation of intention, Theory of Planned Behavior, bibliometric analysisAbstract
A weak finding of behavioral intention and behavior in the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) from a meta-analysis study by Armitage and Conner in 2001 has led to an increasing number of studies aiming to improve the TPB. Several researchers propose potential constructs to bridge the theoretical and empirical gap by suggesting that the construct of desire and the implementation of intentions can fill the theoretical and empirical gaps in the TPB model. The literature study aimed to retrospectively explore TPB studies with desire and implementation of intentions constructs in the behavioral science domain. The research retrieved 191 SCOPUS indexed papers (2012–2019) from the Google Scholars database. It summarized the descriptive data and produced visualization using VOSviewer. The results show that most studies developing the TPB model with other behavioral theories still focus on constructs to shape behavioral intentions because the behavioral intention construct is the best predictor of behavior. Most studies apply a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional survey design to collect primary data. In contrast, the experimental and longitudinal design approaches are relatively neglected in this TPB behavioral study. Furthermore, the analysis of 191 papers shows that the TPB model is often used in research in environmental, sustainable, and transport settings; health; psychological; hospitality and tourism; and innovation and technology. In addition, the use of the TPB model in research with entrepreneurial and legal settings is still limited. From these findings, the research proposes empirical research on TPB to implement further the relationship between desire and intention implementation to improve the TPB model by integrating the TPB model with several other theories, such as Mindset Theory of Action Phase and Model Goal-Directed Behaviour.
Plum Analytics
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behaviour. McGraw-Hill Education.
Ajzen, I. (2015). The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: A commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares. Health Psychology Review, 9(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.883474
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
Bagozzi, R. P., Dholakia, U. M., & Basuroy, S. (2003). How effortful decisions get enacted: The motivating role of decision processes, desires, and anticipated emotions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(4), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.446
BPS. (2010). Sensus penduduk 2010. Retrieved from https://sp2010.bps.go.id/
Carfora, V., Cavallo, C., Caso, D., Del Giudice, T., De Devitiis, B., Viscecchia, R., ... & Cicia, G. (2019). Explaining consumer purchase behavior for organic milk: Including trust and green self-identity within the theory of planned behavior. Food Quality and Preference, 76, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.03.006
Cheng, E. W. L. (2019). Choosing between the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9598-6
Choe, J. Y., Kim, J. J., & Hwang, J. (2020). The environmentally friendly role of edible insect restaurants in the tourism industry: Applying an extended theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(11), 3581–3600. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2020-0352
Choi, Y. J., & Park, J. W. (2017). The decision-making processes of duty-free shop users using a goal directed behavior model: The moderating effect of gender. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31, 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.11.001
Feola, R., Vesci, M., Botti, A., & Parente, R. (2019). The determinants of entrepreneurial intention of young researchers: Combining the theory of planned behavior with the Triple Helix Model. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4), 1424–1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12361
Han, T. I., & Stoel, L. (2017). Explaining socially responsible consumer behavior: A meta-analytic review of theory of planned behavior. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 29(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1251870
Heckhausen, J. (2007). The motivation-volition divide and its resolution in action-phase models of developmental regulation. Research in Human Development, 4(3–4), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600701662983
Indarti, N., Hapsari, N., Lukito-Budi, A. S., & Virgosita, R. (2021). Quo vadis, ethnic entrepreneurship? A bibliometric analysis of ethnic entrepreneurship in growing markets. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(3), 427–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-04-2020-0080
Indarti, N., Lukito-Budi, A. S., & Islam, A. M. (2020). A systematic review of halal supply chain research: To where shall we go? Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(9), 1930–1949. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2020-0161
Ji, L., Liu, C., Huang, L., & Huang, G. (2018). The evolution of Resources Conservation and Recycling over the past 30 years: A bibliometric overview. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 134(July), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.005
Knauder, H., & Koschmieder, C. (2019). Individualized student support in primary school teaching: A review of influencing factors using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Teaching and Teacher Education, 77(January), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.012
Kim, M. J., Lee, C. K., & Jung, T. (2020). Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. Journal of Travel Research, 59(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518818915
Ko, H. C. (2020). Beyond browsing: Motivations for experiential browsing and goal-directed shopping intentions on social commerce websites. Journal of Internet Commerce, 19(2), 212–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2020.1747219
Lee, S. J., & Kim, H. L. (2018). Roles of perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy to volunteer tourists’ intended participation via theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Tourism Research, 20(2), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2171
Li, C., & Wu, Y. (2019). Understanding voluntary intentions within the theories of self-determination and planned behavior. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 31(4), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1526745
Li, X., Wu, P., Shen, G. Q., Wang, X., & Teng, Y. (2017). Mapping the knowledge domains of Building Information Modeling (BIM): A bibliometric approach. Automation in Construction, 84(December), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.011
Lin, N., & Roberts, K. R. (2020). Using the theory of planned behavior to predict food safety behavioral intention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90(September), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102612
Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (2001). The distinction between desire and intention: A folk- conceptual analysis. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 45–67). MIT Press.
Miller, Z. D., Freimund, W., Metcalf, E. C., Nickerson, N., & Powell, R. B. (2019). Merging elaboration and the theory of planned behavior to understand bear spray behavior of day hikers in Yellowstone National Park. Environmental Management, 63, 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01139-w
Moghimehfar, F., Halpenny, E. A., & Walker, G. J. (2018). Front-country campers' constraints, negotiation, and pro-environment behavioral intention: An extension to the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 40(3), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2017.1344163
Morren, M., & Grinstein, A. (2021). The cross-cultural challenges of integrating personal norms into the theory of planned behavior: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling (MASEM) approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 75(June), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101593
Nardi, V. A. M., Jardim, W. C., Ladeira, W., & Santini, F. (2019). Predicting food choice: A meta-analysis based on the theory of planned behavior. British Food Journal, 121(10), 2250–2264. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-08-2018-0504
Nguyen, T. M., Nham, P. T., & Hoang, V. N. (2019). The theory of planned behavior and knowledge sharing: A systematic review and meta-analytic structural equation modelling. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 49(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-10-2018-0086
Oliveira, A., & Rua, O. L. (2018). From intention to entrepreneurial action: Assessing the impact of the barriers on the creation of new organizations. RAUSP Management Journal, 53(4), 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2018-0039
Orbell, S., Hodgkins, S., & Sheeran, P. (1997). Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(9), 945–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297239004
Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164704
Potard, C., Kubiszewski, V., Camus, G., Courtois, R., & Gaymard, S. (2018). Driving under the influence of alcohol and perceived invulnerability among young adults: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55(May), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.033
Purwanto, B. M., Indarti, N., Lukito-Budi, A. S., & Uturestantix. (2020). Berbagai bias dalam studi Longitudinal. In H. M. Jogiyanto (Ed.), Bias di penelitian dan cara mitigasinya. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Scalco, A., Noventa, S., Sartori, R., & Ceschi, A. (2017). Predicting organic food consumption: A meta-analytic structural equation model based on the theory of planned behavior. Appetite, 112, 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.007
Schuster, L., Tossan, V., & Drennan, J. (2017). Consumer acceptance of mhealth services: A comparison of behavioral intention models. Services Marketing Quarterly, 38(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2017.1289791
Shin, Y. H., Kim, H., & Severt, K. (2018). Antecedents of consumers' intention to visit food trucks. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 21(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2017.1368810
Si, H., Shi, J. G., Tang, D., Wen, S., Miao, W., & Duan, K. (2019a). Application of the theory of planned behavior in environmental science: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152788
Si, H., Shi, J. G., Wu, G., Chen, J., & Zhao, X. (2019b). Mapping the bike sharing research published from 2010 to 2018: A scientometric review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.157
Stritch, J. M. (2017). Minding the time: A critical look at longitudinal design and data analysis in quantitative public management research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17697117
Sun, W. (2020). Toward a theory of ethical consumer intention formation: Re-extending the theory of planned behavior. AMS Review, 10, 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-019-00156-6
Tiraieyari, N., & Krauss, S. E. (2018). Predicting youth participation in urban agriculture in Malaysia: Insights from the theory of planned behavior and the functional approach to volunteer motivation. Agriculture and Human Values, 35, 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-018-9854-8
Tornikoski, E., & Maalaoui, A. (2019). Critical reflections – The theory of planned behaviour: An interview with Icek Ajzen with implications for entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 37(5), 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619829681
Van Gelderen, M., Kautonen, T., Wincent, J., & Biniari, M. (2018). Implementation intentions in the entrepreneurial process: Concept, empirical findings, and research agenda. Small Business Economics. 51, 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9971-6
Xu, Z., Yu, D., & Wang, X. (2018). A bibliometric overview of International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics between 2010 and 2017. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics. 10, 2375–2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0875-9
Yanbing, S., Zhu, R., Wang, C., Han, S., Liu, H., & Duan, Z. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of Journal of Nursing Management from 1993 to 2018. Journal of Nursing Management. 28(2), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12925
Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., & Guillaumie, L. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 1‒12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660
Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Ahrari, S., Krauss, S. E., Samah, A. A., Meng, L. K., & Ariffin, Z. (2019). Predicting social entrepreneurial intention: A meta-analytic path analysis based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Research, 96(March), 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.030
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Uturestantix, Bernardinus Maria Purwanto, Andy Susilo Lukito-Budi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
