Administrators’ Roles in Training Programs and Their Relationship with Trainees’ Motivation

Authors

  • Azman Ismail National University of Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor. MALAYSIA
  • Anis Anisah Abdullah National University of Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor. MALAYSIA
  • Umi Hamidaton Mohd Soffian Lee National University of Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor. MALAYSIA
  • Nur Izzaty Mohamad National University of Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor. MALAYSIA.
  • Nurul Inani Ibrahim Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v9i1.2031

Keywords:

administrator roles, training program, trainee motivation

Abstract

This research was conducted to assess the relationship between the role of administrators in training programs and the motivation level of the trainees. The data were collected through a survey method conducted on employees at a government agency in East Malaysia. The outcomes of SmartPLS path model analysis show three important findings. First, administrators’ roles in training programs are significantly related to trainees’ motivation. Second, provision of support is significantly linked to the motivation of the trainees. Third, communication is significantly related to the motivation level of the trainees. Thus, the findings indicate that administrators’ roles, support, and communication act as significant determinants of trainees’ motivation in an organizational sample.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biographies

Azman Ismail, National University of Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor. MALAYSIA

Faculty of Economics & Management.

Anis Anisah Abdullah, National University of Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor. MALAYSIA

Institute of Islam Hadhari

Umi Hamidaton Mohd Soffian Lee, National University of Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor. MALAYSIA

Institute of Islam Hadhari

Nur Izzaty Mohamad, National University of Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor. MALAYSIA.

Institute of Islam Hadhari

Nurul Inani Ibrahim, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. MALAYSIA

Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development 

References

Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422-436. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968

Ahmed, U., Abdul Majid, A. H., Mohd Zin, M. L., Phulpoto, W., & Umrani, W. A. (2016). Role and impact of reward and accountability on training transfer. Business and Economics Journal, 7(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2151-6219.1000195

Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach.

Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 7-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-08-2014-0042

Aragón, M. I. B., Jiménez, D., & Valle, R. S. (2014). Training and performance: The mediating role of organizational learning. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 17(3), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2013.05.003

Asfaw, A. M., Argaw, M. D., & Bayissa, L. (2015). The impact of training and development on employee performance and effectiveness: A case study of District Five Administration Office, Bole Sub-City, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Journal of Human Resource

and Sustainability Studies, 3(4), 188-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2015.34025

Aziz, S. F. A. (2016). Evaluating training effectiveness using the Malaysian sample : Tracing the mediation effect of training motivation using SEM-AMOS. Internation Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(S6), 94-100.

Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 285-309.

Bauer, T. N. & Erdogan, B. (2012). Organizational socialization outcomes: Now and into the future. In C. R. Wanberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational socialization (pp. 97-112). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Chaloner, B. (2006). An evaluative study on building the bridge between the training room and the workplace. Evaluation & Research in Education, 19(1), 21-37.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790608668323

Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp.295-336). UK: Taylor & Francis.

Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. E. Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares (pp. 655-690). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2014). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace. New York, US: McGraw-Hill Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publication.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research, 382-388.

Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial

validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 5.

Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101-107.

Giran, H., Amin, A., & Halim, B. A. (2014). The impact of self-efficacy towards training motivation at Kolej Poly-Tech MARA Kuantan, Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 10(19), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n19p69

Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). US: SAGE Publications.

Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). US: SAGE Publications.

Harris, H. & Kumra, S. (2000). International manager development - cross-cultural training in highly diverse environments. Journal of Management Development, 19(7), 602-614. https://doi.

org/10.1108/02621710010373278

Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. (2009). The use of Partial Least Squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (Advances in international marketing, volume 20) (pp. 277-319). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014

Ismail, A., Foboy, N. A., Abdullah, M. M., & Mazumder, M. N. H. (2013). A study of the correlation between training administration and training motivation. Management & Marketing Challenges for the

Knowledge Society, 8(1), 95-108.

Ismail, A., Hasan, A. B. M., & Sulaiman, A. Z. (2010). Supervisor’s role as an antecedent of training transfer and motivation to learn in training programs. Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, 6(2), 18-38.

Ismail, A., & Ibrahim, N. I. (2010). Motivasi Latihan sebagai

pembolehubah penghubung antara program latihan dan keberkesanan latihan. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 8(2), 83-98.

Khan, I., Mufti, S., & Nazir, N. A. (2015). Transfer of training: A reorganized review on work environment and motivation to transfer. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 4(2), 197-219.

Machin, M. A., & Fogarty, G. J. (2004). Assessing the antecedents of transfer intentions in a training context. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(3), 222-236.

Madagamage, G. T., Warnakulasooriya, B. N. F., & Wickramasuriya, H. V. A. (2014). The impact of trainee characteristics and work environmental factors on motivation to learn. Asian Journal of

Management Sciences & Education, 3(4), 60-73.

Miner, J. B. (2015). Organizational behavior 1: Essential theories of motivation and leadership. UK: Routledge.

Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee training and development. New York, US: McGraw-Hill.

Noe, R. A. (2017). Employee training and development (7th ed.). New York, US: McGraw-Hill.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, US: McGraw-Hill.

Ramlall, S. (2004). A review of employee motivation theories and their implications for employee retention within organizations. Journal of American Academy of Business, 5, 52-63.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research method for business: A skill-building approach (6th ed.). US: John Wiley & Sons.

Tabassi, A. A., & Bakar, A. H. A. (2009). Training, motivation, and performance: The case of human resource management in construction projects in Mashhad, Iran. International Journal of

Project Management, 27(5), 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.08.002

Tai, W. T. (2006). Effects of training framing, general selfefficacy

and training motivation on trainees’ training effectiveness. Personnel Review, 35(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480610636786

Tsai, W. C., & Tai, W. T. (2003). Perceived importance as a mediator of the relationship between training assignment and training motivation. Personnel Review, 32(2), 151-163. https://doi.

org/10.1108/00483480310460199

Zahra, S., Iram, A., & Naeem, H. (2014). Employee training and its effect on employees’ job motivation and commitment : Developing and proposing a conceptual model. IOSR Journal of Business and

Management, 16(9), 60-68.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-31
Abstract 6578  .
PDF downloaded 558  .