Comparing the Immersive Levels of Trivia Hidden Object Game Paper-based and Game Applications
Main Article Content
Abstract
The widespread development of the digital gaming industry in Indonesia began in 2000. The growth in interest in gaming has led to various objectives and encouraged research into several aspects and concepts of digital games. The aim of this research is to examine how significant the immersive differences are between paper-based game versions and applications/games among participants over 40 years old. The total average immersion obtained from the paper version is 4.43, while the application/game version is 5.85. For the average immersion per scale, the results of testing per scale show that the lowest average for the paper version is found in the Presence scale with 4.15, and the highest in Usability with 4.81. In the application/game version, the lowest average is found in the Focus Of Attention scale with a total of 5.55. The Usability scale scored 6.11, which is the highest result in the application/game version. The Interest scale is a category that has a significant difference between the paper and application/game versions with a margin of 1.6.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author(s) assign to JGGAG licence to use this document for personal use and in courses of instruction provided that the article is used in full and this copyright statement is reproduced. The authors also grant a non-exclusive licence to JGGAG to publish this document in full on the World Wide Web within the JGGAG website. Any other usage is prohibited without the express permission of the author(s).
References
[1] A. Mulachela, K. Rizki, and Y. A. Wahyudin, “Analisis Perkembangan Industri Game di Indonesia Melalui Pendekatan Rantai Nilai Global (Global Value Chain),” 2020.
[2] A. Rienzo and C. Cubillos, “Playability and player experience in digital games for elderly: A systematic literature review,” Jul. 02, 2020, MDPI AG. doi: 10.3390/s20143958.
[3] R. Daneels, N. D. Bowman, D. Possler, and E. D. Mekler, “The ‘eudaimonic experience’: A scoping review of the concept in digital games research,” Media Commun, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 178–190, 2021, doi: 10.17645/mac.v9i2.3824.
[4] J. S. Cardona, J. Arango Lopez, F. Luis Gutiérrez Vela, and F. Moreira, “Older Adults and Games from a perspective of Playability, Game Experience and Pervasive Environments: A Systematics Literature Review.”
[5] R. Nurcholis, A. I. Purnamasari, A. R. Dikananda, O. Nurdiawan, and S. Anwar, “Game Edukasi Pengenalan Huruf Hiragana Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berbahasa Jepang,” Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 338–345, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.47065/bits.v3i3.1091.
[6] M. Yulianto, D. Afriyantari, and P. Putri, “Pengembangan Game Edukasi Pengenalan Iklim Dan Cuaca Untuk Siswa Kelas III Sekolah Dasar,” Jurnal Teknik Elektro, vol. 20, 2020.
[7] A. Pyae, “The potential of digital games in promoting older people’s active ageing in developing countries: the case of Myanmar,” 2017.
[8] A. Lutfi, F. Aftinia, and B. E. Permani, “GAMIFICATION: GAME AS A MEDIUM FOR LEARNING CHEMISTRY TO MOTIVATE AND INCREASE RETENTION OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES,” J Technol Sci Educ, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 193–207, 2023, doi: 10.3926/jotse.1842.
[9] M. Kalogiannakis, S. Papadakis, and A. I. Zourmpakis, “Gamification in science education. A systematic review of the literature,” Educ Sci (Basel), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–36, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11010022.
[10] M. Kalogiannakis, S. Papadakis, and A. I. Zourmpakis, “Gamification in science education. A systematic review of the literature,” Educ Sci (Basel), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–36, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11010022.
[11] D. Novaliendry and S. Andriani, “ARJUNA) Managed by Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education,” Accredited by National Journal Accreditation, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 187–192, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.iaii.or.id
[12] F. Kale, R. P. Situmorang, and S. P. Hastuti, “Development of Mobile Learning-based Edugame on Respiratory System Material to Improve Students’ Digital Literacy,” Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, vol. 11, no. 2, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v11i2.6237.
[13] A. Uriarte-Portillo, M. B. Ibáñez, R. Zataraín-Cabada, and M. L. Barrón-Estrada, “Higher Immersive Profiles Improve Learning Outcomes in Augmented Reality Learning Environments,” Information (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 5, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13050218.
[14] Y. Georgiou and E. A. Kyza, “The development and validation of the ARI questionnaire: An instrument for measuring immersion in location-based augmented reality settings,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 98, pp. 24–37, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.014.
[15] C. Zhang, “The Why, What, and How of Immersive Experience,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 90878–90888, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993646.
[16] Manisha and S. Gargrish, “Augmented Reality and education: a comprehensive review and analysis of methodological considerations in empirical studies,” Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 99–109, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.20368/1971-8829/1135864.
[17] M. T. Cheng, H. C. She, and L. A. Annetta, “Game immersion experience: Its hierarchical structure and impact on game-based science learning,” J Comput Assist Learn, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 232–253, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12066.
[18] L. Husniah, B. F. Pratama, and H. Wibowo, “Gamification And GDLC (Game Development Life Cycle) Application For Designing The Sumbawa Folklore Game ”The Legend Of Tanjung Menangis (Crying Cape)”,” Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, pp. 351–358, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.22219/kinetik.v3i4.721.
[19] J. Lasmana Putra and C. Kesuma, “Penerapan Game Development Life Cycle Untuk Video Game Dengan Model Role Playing Game,” 2021. [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.bsi.ac.id/index.php/co-science
[20] A. F. Kiliç, I. Uysal, and B. Kalkan, “An alternative to likert scale: Emoji,” 2021, Association of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology (EPODDER). doi: 10.21031/epod.864336.