Dialogue of Friendship:  A Phenomenological Study of Christian-Muslim Interreligious Dialogue and Peacebuilding in Mindanao, Philippines

Jesster B. Fonseca

doi:10.21512/icj.v3i2.15755

Authors

Jesster B. Fonseca San Beda University, Manila, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/icj.v3i2.15755

Keywords:

Interreligious dialogue, Peacebuilding, Dialogue of life, Dialogue of Friendship, Peace institutions, Dialogue institutions

Abstract

Religions were usurped, justifying atrocious acts against each other since time immemorial. To name a few in contemporary times, the Marawi siege of 2017, and the September 11, 2001, attack against the United States of America. Recently, the Israeli-Palestinian Gaza war of 2023 reignited more than half a century of conflict. Now, we have the US-led Israel war against Iran, and US President Donald Trump was heard trumpeting his messianic role in saving Christianity from barbarous deeds of the Middle-Eastern states, justifying now his more atrocious deeds against them. This study investigates the role of interreligious dialogue in the life of Christians and Muslims living in Southern Philippines, also known as Mindanao, in this post-colonial period. It intends to understand the state or condition of dialogue between adherents of religions, particularly, the Muslims and Christians of Mindanao, as to how interreligious dialogue brought about mutual understanding, peaceful co-existence, cooperation, and harmonious living between them. And by this, the findings can hopefully contribute to the establishment of peace in other places and peoples in conflict by indicating the salient points that serve as learning considerations. Thus, to find the answer, the researcher worked on knowing the lived experiences of co-researchers who are advocates, practitioners, and scholars of interreligious dialogue (IRD) in Mindanao. And by this, the data gathered and analyzed became a resource of learning in the work of the peace process via interreligious dialogue among adherents of different religions. Phenomenology was employed as its interpretive framework in the data supplied by 4 co-researchers. All of them have dedicated years working and studying, Christians and Muslims thriving and coexisting in Mindanao. In the final analysis, the success story of interreligious dialogue in Mindanao was attributed to the dialogue of friendship between Christians and Muslims thriving there. In their dialogue of friendship, they were able to affirm each other’s identity and history, surpassing challenges they had encountered along the way.

Dimensions

References

Admirand, P. (2024). Confessions of a Catholic Theologian: On Silence, the Shoah, and the War in Israel-Palestine. Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations. 2024, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p1-23.

Baker, C. (2013). The soul of community. Emergence Coaching. https://carolynbaker.net

Berger, P., & Zijderveld, A. (2009). In praise of doubt: How to have convictions without becoming fanatic. Harper Collins Publishers.

Bohm, D. (2014). On dialogue. Routledge Great Minds.

Brigham, E. M. (2008). Communicative Action as an approach to ecumenical dialogue. The Ecumenical Review 60, no.3, 288-305. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1758-6623.2008.tb00670.x/full

Brittain, C. (2014). A religious repair for communicative reason? Habermas's return to religion and its theological reception. Toronto Journal of Theology 30/2, 171-190.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and

design. Harvard University Press.

Caputo, J. (1999). Heidegger. In S. Critchley, & W.R. Schroeder (Eds.), A companion to Continental philosophy, Blackwell.

Carman, T., & Hanse, M. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge University.

Engebretson, K. (2009). Beyond neutrality: The Catholic university and inter-religious dialogue. Journal of Adult Theological Education 6, no.1, 42-54. http://www.maneyonline.com/toc/ate/6/1

English Standard Version (ESV) Study Bible. (2008). https://www.crossway.org/bibles/esv-study-bible-case/

Erciyes, E. (2019). Three pillars of phenomenology: Husserl, Heidegger and Merlau-Ponty. https://www.memphis.edu/philosophy/opo2019/pdfs/erciyes-erdem.pdf.

Fonseca, J. (2019). Capitalism vs. creation spirituality resolve (C.S.R.): A tete-a-tete of two cultural consciouness. Bedan Research Journal, Vol. 4, 72-97. https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v4i1.4

Francis. (2020). Fratelli Tutti: Encyclical on fraternity and social friendship. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20201003_enciclica-fratelli-tutti.html

Gaspar, K., Lapad, E., Maravillas, A.(2002). Mapagpakamalinawon: A reader for the Mindanawon peace advocate. Alternate Forum for Reseach in Mindanao, Inc. & Catholic Relief Services.

Gierus, R. & Gualberto, A. (2023, December). Interreligious Dialogue and Gender Justice in Brazil. Ecumenical Review. Vol. 75 Issue 5, p519-533.

Giorgi, A. (2012). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43 (1), 3-12.

Greene, M. (1997). The lived world, literature and education. In D. Vandenberg (Ed.), Phenomenology & education discourse (pp. 169-190). Heinemann.

Guy-Evans, O. (2025). Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems theory. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/bronfenbrenner.html

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. volume 1. Reason and rationalization of society. Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1989). The theory of communicative action. volume 2. Lifeworld and system: A critique offFunctionalist reason. Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy 14, no.1, 1-25. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x/epdf

Hovdelien, O. (2011). Post-secular consensus? On the Munich-dialogue between Joseph Ratzinger and Jürgen Habermas. Australian e-Journal of Theology 18, no.2, 107-116.

Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster.

Husserl, E. (1969). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (W.R. Boyce, Trans.). George Allen & Unwin.

Institute for Economics & Peace (2024). Key trends in the Global Peace Index 2024. Vision of Humanity. https://www.visionofhumanity.org/maps/#/Husserl, E. (2003). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (C. Welch, Trans.). Ateost Press.

John Paul II. (1990). Ex corde ecclesiae: Apostolic constitution on catholic universities. Vatican. http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_15081990_ex-corde-

ecclesiae.html

Knitter, P. (2012). Theologies of religions. Orbis Books.

Kosuta, M. (2017). Post-colonial religious conflict in southeast Asia. Education about Asia, Volume 22:1, 24-30. https://www.asianstudies.org/publications/eaa/archives/postcolonial-religious-conflict-in-southeast-asia/

Kroeger, J. (2014). Asia’s dynamic local churches: Serving dialogue and mission. Claretian Communications Foundation.

Kruger, D. (1988). An introduction to phenomenological psychology (2nd ed.). Juta.

Kurecic, P. (2015). Geoeconomic and geopolitical conflicts: Outcomes of the geopolitical economy in a contemporary world. World Review of Political Economy, Vol. 6, No.4, 522-543. https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.6.4.0522

Mendoza, R. (2014). A journey to the kingdom in the spirit: Becoming a church for all the peoples of Asia. Claretian Publications.

Mercado, L. (2004). Inter-religious explorations. Logos Publication.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Michel, T. (2005). Interreligious dialogue in FABC perspective. In F. J. Eilers (Ed.), Interreligious dialogue as communication, FABC-OSC books. (Vol. 6). Logos Publications, Inc.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.

Paul VI. (1965). Nostra Aetate: The declaration on the relation of the church to non-Christian religions. Vatican.

Perry, C. (2015). The Jungian shadow. The Society of Analytical Psychology. https://www.thesap.org.uk/articles-on-jungian-psychology-2/about-analysis-and-therapy/the-shadow/

Pilario, D. F. (2010). Interreligious dialogue: Paradigms of theological interpretations. In A. Riyanto (Ed.), Interreligious dialogue and formation (Vol. 3). Commission of Vincentian Charism and Culture in Asia Pacific And Widya Sasana Publication.

Robinson, G. (2021). Global jihad: A brief history. Stanford University Press.

Rosales, G. & Arevalo, C. (Eds.). (1997). For all the peoples of Asia. Claretian Publications.

Schwandt, T. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Sage.

Tothamkara, G. (2011). Church documents on interreligious dialogue. https://cccaprf.wordpress.com/2011/02/05/church-documents-on-interreligious-dialogue/

Van Manen, M. (1997). Phenomenological pedagogy and the question of meaning. In D. Vandenberg (Ed.), Phenomenology and education discourse (pp.41-68). Heinemann.

Vandenberg, D. (1997). Phenomenological research in the study of education. In D. Vandenberg (Ed.), Phenomenology & education discourse (3-37). Heinemann.

Welman, J. C. & S.J. Kruger. (1999). Research methodology for the business and administrative sciences. International Thompson.

Wertz, F. J. et al. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. The Guilford Press.