Revolusi Ilmiah dalam Pengembangan Machine Learning untuk Penjaminan Kualitas Perangkat Lunak

Nyoman Ayu Gita Gayatri

doi:10.21512/icj.v3i2.14803

Authors

Nyoman Ayu Gita Gayatri Doctoral Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/icj.v3i2.14803

Keywords:

Character development, machine learning, software quality assurance, trustworthy AI

Abstract

The integration of Machine Learning (ML) into Software Quality Assurance (SQA) is commonly discussed as a technical advancement in defect prediction, test automation, and software reliability. Such a perspective, however, is insufficient for understanding the human consequences of this transformation. This study repositions ML-driven SQA as a scientific, ethical, and character-development issue in the transition towards Industry 5.0. Drawing on Thomas S. Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions, Abraham Maslow’s psychology of science, and the principles of Trustworthy AI, this article examines how the transition from deterministic testing to learning-based quality assurance changes the professional identity and moral responsibilities of software engineers. The study employs a qualitative interdisciplinary design through a Systematic Literature Review, Conceptual Framework Analysis, and philosophical hermeneutics. The synthesis indicates that conventional SQA has entered a Kuhnian crisis because rule-based testing is increasingly unable to accommodate the uncertainty, scale, and dynamic interdependence of cloud-native and AI-enabled systems. ML introduces a new, probabilistic paradigm that is incommensurable with the former paradigm in terms of evidence, decision-making, and the role of engineers. The article argues that this transition requires engineers to move beyond a safety-oriented mentality characterized by dependence on certainty and procedural control toward a growth-oriented character marked by epistemic courage, adaptability, humility, ethical responsibility, and human–AI collaboration. The study proposes the Kuhn–Maslow–Trustworthy AI Framework as a conceptual foundation for defining the character of engineers in Industry 5.0. The findings emphasize that trustworthy and explainable AI should not be treated as optional technical features, but as moral infrastructures for responsible software quality decisions.

Dimensions

References

Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., ... Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012

Avşar, Y. (2025). The evolution of quality management in the era of Industry 4.0 and 5.0. Archives of Engineering Knowledge, 11(1), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.30657/aek.2025.11.14

Batool, I., & Khan, T. A. (2023). Software fault prediction using deep learning techniques. Software Quality Journal, 31(4), 1241-1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-023-09642-4

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F.,

Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28, 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.; J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum.

Gomaa, A. H. (2025). Quality management excellence in the era of Industry 4.0 (Quality 4.0): A comprehensive review, gap analysis, and strategic framework. Advancements in Science and Technology, 2, 1-40.

Hagendorff, T. (2022). A virtue-based framework to support putting AI ethics into practice. Philosophy & Technology, 35, Article 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00553-z

Hagendorff, T. (2023). AI ethics and its pitfalls: Not living up to its own standards? AI and Ethics, 3, 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00173-5

Huang, J. (2023). Digital engineering transformation with trustworthy AI towards Industry 4.0: Emerging paradigm shifts. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 26(3-4), 267-290. https://doi.org/10.3233/JID-229010

Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406

Khanam, R., Hussain, M., Hill, R., & Allen, P. (2024). A comprehensive review of convolutional neural networks for defect detection in industrial applications. IEEE Access, 12, 94250-94295. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3425166

Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering—A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009

Kožnjak, B. (2017). Kuhn meets Maslow: The psychology behind scientific revolutions. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 48(2), 257-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-016-9352-x

Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions: 50th anniversary edition. University of Chicago Press.

Maslow, A. H. (1966). The psychology of science: A reconnaissance. Harper & Row.

Ngo, K., Nguyen, V., & Nguyen, T. (2022). Research on test flakiness: From unit to system testing. In Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/3551349.3563242

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pan, R., Bagherzadeh, M., Ghaleb, T. A., & Briand, L. (2022). Test case selection and prioritization using machine learning: A systematic literature review. Empirical Software Engineering, 27, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10066-6

Pham, P., Nguyen, V., & Nguyen, T. (2022). A review of AI-augmented end-to-end test automation tools. In Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (pp. 1-4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3551349.3563240

Ricca, F., Marchetto, A., & Stocco, A. (2025). A multi-year grey literature review on AI-assisted test automation. Information and Software Technology, 186, 107799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107799

Sönning, L., & Werner, V. (2021). The replication crisis, scientific revolutions, and linguistics. Linguistics, 59(5), 1179-1206. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0045

Tabassi, E. (Ed.). (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford University Press.

Wang, S., Huang, L., Gao, A., Ge, J., Zhang, T., Feng, H., Satyarth, I., Li, M., Zhang, H., & Ng, V. (2023). Machine/deep learning for software engineering: A systematic literature review. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 49(3), 1188-1231. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2022.3173346

Yao, X., Ma, N., Zhang, J., Wang, K., Yang, E., & Faccio, M. (2024). Enhancing wisdom manufacturing as industrial metaverse for Industry and Society 5.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 35(1), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02027-7