Menari Bersama Hegel di Era Post-Truth
Dialektika, Moralitas, dan Pengembangan Karakter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/icj.v3i1.14480Keywords:
Post-truth, moral crisis, character development, Hegelian dialecticAbstract
The post-truth era is characterized by the weakening of the authority of truth, the dominance of emotion over rationality, and the fragmentation of the public sphere, which has led to a moral crisis and the fragility of human character. This study aims to explore the relevance of Hegel's philosophy as a conceptual framework for responding to this crisis. Using a qualitative method based on literature studies and Hegel's dialectical analysis, this study reinterprets the concepts of ‘Geist’, ‘Bildung’, and ‘Sittlichkeit’ as strategies for character development. The results of the study show that true character can only be formed through intersubjective consciousness, historical-cultural processes, and ethical praxis in the community. Therefore, character education in the post-truth era should not stop at digital literacy or the internalization of moral values, but must foster critical reflection, moral courage, and active participation in ethical life together. This study concludes that the post-truth crisis is not only a threat, but also a dialectical opportunity to strengthen human integrity and rebuild the moral foundations of contemporary society.
References
Al Azis, M. R. (2021). Dialektika Hegel (tesis–antitesis–sintesis) dalam etika dan filsafat berkomunikasi era kontemporer. Jurnal Komunikasi, 12(2), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.31294/jkom.v12i2.10472
Amanda, J. F. (2024). Teori Hegel: Dialektika dalam perubahan masyarakat. Kompasiana. https://www.kompasiana.com/amanda6147/65926f8fc57afb6464295f03/teori-hegel-dialektika-dalam-perubahan-masyarakat
Arendt, H. (1971). Thinking and moral considerations: A lecture. Social Research.
Austad, J. A. (2001). The (dis)information age: From post-truth to post-postmodernism. Verno Press.
Bajwa, N., & Ng, V. (2025). Character virtues: Toward a functionalist perspective on character virtue science. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050638
Bykova, M. F. (2020). Hegel’s philosophy of Bildung. In The Palgrave Hegel handbook (pp. 425–449). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26597-7_22
Cedeño, D. (2024). Applying Hegelian theory to contemporary family science. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 16(3), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12574
de Vries, W. (1988). Hegel’s theory of mental activity. Cornell University Press.
Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2015). Empathy, justice, and moral behavior. AJOB Neuroscience, 6(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2015.1047055
Effron, D. A., & Helgason, B. A. (2022). The moral psychology of misinformation: Why we excuse dishonesty in a post-truth world. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, 101375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101375
Enroth, H. (2023). Crisis of authority: The truth of post-truth. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 36(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-021-09415-6
Forster, M. N. (1998). Hegel’s idea of a Phenomenology of spirit. University of Chicago Press.
Giacché, V. (2020). Hegel: La dialettica. Introduzione al pensiero hegeliano. Diarkos.
Gjesdal, K. (2015). Bildung. In The Oxford handbook of German philosophy in the nineteenth century. Oxford University Press.
Ham, J., Kinzel, U., & Pan, D. T. (2023). The origins of German self-cultivation: Bildung and the future of the humanities. Berghahn Books.
Hardimon, M. O. (1994). Hegel’s social philosophy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624773
Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045
Hegel, G. W. F. (1894). Lectures on the history of philosophy (E. S. Haldane & F. H. Simson, Eds.). Trübner & Co.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1971). Werke in zwanzig Bänden (Vol. 19). Suhrkamp.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1974). System der Sittlichkeit: Kritik des Fichteschen Naturrechts (1802/03). Felix Meiner Verlag.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Herder, J. G. von. (1787). Gott: Einige Gespräche. Ettinger.
Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517752459
Humboldt, W. von. (1903). Theorie der Bildung des Menschen. Reimar.
Humboldt, W. von. (1980). Theorie der Bildung des Menschen. J. G. Cotta.
Jauernig, J., Uhl, M., & Walkowitz, G. (2022). People prefer moral discretion to algorithms: Algorithm aversion beyond intransparency. Philosophy & Technology, 35(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00495-y
Kinghorn, S. (2020). The echo chamber: Theater in a post-truth world. In After in-yer-face theatre (pp. 231–246). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39427-1_15
Lazarus, M. (2025). Absolute ethical life: Aristotle, Hegel and Marx. Stanford University Press.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the post-truth era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
Long, P., Johnson, B., MacDonald, S., Bader, S. R., Wall, T., Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2021). Postmodernism and post-truth. In Media Studies (pp. 414–440). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315690834-14
Manne, K. (2016). Down girl: The logic of misogyny. Oxford University Press.
Marx, W. (1971). Hegels Pha ̈nomenologie des Geistes: die Bestimmung ihrer Idee in ‘Vorrede’ und ‘Einleitung.’ Vittorio Klostermann.
Ng, K. (2020). Hegel’s concept of life: Self-consciousness, freedom, logic. Oxford University Press.
Pelczynski, Z. A. (1984). The state and civil society:Studies in Hegel’s political philosophy. CUP Archive.
Peperzak, A. T. (2001). Modern freedom: Hegel’s legal, moral, and political philosophy. Springer.
Rommetveit, K. (2022). Introduction: Post-Truth — Another fork in modernity’s path. In Post-Truth Imaginations: New Starting Points for Critique of Politics and Technoscience. Routledge.
Saumantri, T. (2023). Hegel’s rationalism: The dialectical method of approaching metaphysical problems. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 6(3).
Simon, J. C. (2020). Pendidikan Kristiani di era post-truth: Sebuah perenungan hermeneutis Paul Ricoeur. Dunamis: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristiani, 5(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.30648/dun.v5i1.330
Solovev, K., & Pröllochs, N. (2022). Moral Emotions Shape the Virality of COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, 3706–3717. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512266
Stekeler-Weithofer, P. (2020). Absolute Spirit in Performative Self-Relations of Persons. In The Palgrave Hegel Handbook (pp. 109–131). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26597-7_6
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton University Press.
Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Alfred A. Knopf.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Vacura, M. (2020). Emergence of the Post-truth Situation—Its Sources and Contexts. Disputatio, 9(13), 1–17.
Vogelmann, F. (2018). The Problem of Post-Truth Frieder Vogelmann Abstract. Behemoth A Journal on Civilisation, 11(2).
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. In Council of Europe.
Wood, A. W. (2012). Hegel’s ethical thought. Cambridge University Press.
Zed, M. (2008). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Julius Stefanus Sibagariang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Â
USER RIGHTS
 All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
Â






This work is licensed under a