Persuasive Strategies in Selected UNICEF Speaker’s Speech
Keywords:persuasion, persuasive strategies, speech, UNICEF speaker
The research examined the persuasive strategies employed in selected UNICEF speakers’ speeches (BTS - RM and Jin, Millie Bobby Brown, and David Beckham). The observation aimed to determine the types of persuasive strategies used in selected UNICEF speakers’ speeches and how they were implemented. The research employed a descriptive qualitative approach in its research design. In the data analysis process, the analysis was conducted by describing and interpreting each data point in the form of words or utterances according to the context. A purposive sampling of all facts was used to collect data. In addition, the research used Aristotle’s theory of persuasion as a reference to help understand and analyze the data found from the speech. According to the data analysis, the research discovers 49 data points that utilize persuasive strategies. They employ all of Aristotle’s persuasive strategies to persuade their audience. These are the strategies of ethos, pathos, and logos. In their speeches at the children’s day event, BTS, and David mostly express pathos, while Millie mostly expresses logos. It proves that by expressing their credibility, serving realistic information, and including the hearer’s emotions in their speech, UNICEF speakers intentionally attempt to achieve their purpose.
Abu-Hassoub, A. M. (2021). Persuasive strategies in the speech of the believing man of Pharaoh’s people: A study in critical discourse analysis. Egyptian Journal of Linguistics and Translation, 5(1), 66-98.
Al-Ghamdi, N. A. S., & Alghofaily, R. (2019). Cross-cultural linguistic analysis of persuasive techniques in Shark Tank. International Journal of English Language Education, 7(2), 82-107. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v7i2.15416.
Alabbad, A., Al Mansur, N., & Ypsilantis, G. (2019). Persuasive strategies in academic female Saudi application letter writing. Rhetoric and Communications E-Journal, 40, 12-52.
Alkhawaldeh, A. A. (2021). Persuasive strategies of Jordanian government in fighting COVID-19. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(1), 274-293. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-16.
Alkhodari, F. T., & Habil, H. (2019). Analysis of Zakir Naik’s persuasion discourse. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 1242-1246. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1177.0585C19.
Almagsosi, A. J., & Alghezzy, D. K. H. (2020). Persuasion in media. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(3), 336-344. https://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v10i03.027.
Alousque, I. N. (2019). Persuasive strategies in mission statements. Circulo de Linguistica Aplicada a La Comunicacion, 80, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.66599.
Andriani, W., & Marlina, L. (2019). Persuasive strategies used by multi-level marketing and insurance agents. E-Journal of English Language & Literature, 8(4), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v8i4.106496.
Arofah, K. (2018). Rhetorical analysis of hate speech: Case study of hate speech related to Ahok’s religion blasphemy case. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v11i1.3119.
Atherton, M. (1995). Grasping sentences as wholes: Henry Sweet's ideo of language study in the early middle ages. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 96(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674971.2008.11827192.
Charland, G., Huang, H., Li, Y., & Li, Y. (2017). Ethos, pathos, and logos - A typology for analyzing tweeting comments in scholarly articles. IConference. pp 645-649. https://doi.org/10.9776/17310.
Chen, Y. (2018). On rhetorical functions of narratives in Hillary Clinton’s speeches. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 6(4), 134-139. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180604.15.
Crystal, D., & Robins, R. H. (2021). Language. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
Elhai, N. E. H. A. (2020). An analysis of persuasive strategies in the political talks of Ahmed Ouyahia: A contrastive study of Arabic and French. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(1), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.51.50.
Faiz, A., Yulianti, A. I., & Septiana, D. (2020). Trump’s speech about Jerusalem: An analysis on persuasive strategies. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 2(2), 160-176. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v2i2.160-176.
Fatkhiyati, N. R. (2019). Rhetorical strategy and linguistics features in e-petition through Change.org. Lingua Cultura, 13(4), 239-245. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i4.6104.
Gaur, A., Augustyn, A., Zeidan, A., Batra, A., Zelazko, A., Eldridge, A., McKenna, A., Tikkanen, A., Field, A., Gadzikowski, A., Screiber, B. A., Duignan, B., Das, D., & Mahajan, D. (2021). The editors of encyclopaedia Britannica is identified as a contributor. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/editor/The-Editors-of-Encyclopaedia-Britannica/4419.
Ghasemi, F. (2020). Persuasive language in presidential speeches: A contrastive study based on Aristotelian rhetoric. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics, 12, 19-38. https://doi.org/10.5750/bjll.v12i.1872.
Ginting, R. S. P., Sili, S., & Setyowati, R. (2019). The persuasive technique types in Donald Trump’s public speaking. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 3(2), 197-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v3i2.1794.
Goldin, O. (2020). Pistis, persuasion, and logos in Aristotle. Elenchos, 41(1), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2020-0003.
Hamzah, I. F. A., Johan, N. I. M., & Rahmat, N. H. (2019). Ethos, pathos, logos: The versatility of a hijab video advertisement. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 3(3), 82-99. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3524222.
Im, J., Kim, H., & Miao, L. (2021). CEO letters: Hospitality corporate narratives during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102701.
Janam, I. J. (2019). A critical discourse analysis of the language of persuasion used in the election campaigns by American parliaments. Alustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, 58(4), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v58i4.1017.
Jannah, R. N., Nur, S., & Rauf, M. (2020). Persuasive strategies used by the coaches in the blind audition of The Voice USA 2018. Journal of Culture, Language, and Literature, 1(1), 47-59.
Keraf, G. (2004). Argumentasi dan narasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Krishnan, I. A., Lin, T. M., Ching, H. S., Ramalingam, S., & Maruthai, E. (2020). Using rhetorical approach of ethos, pathos and logos by Malaysian engineering students in persuasive email writings. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(4), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i4.386.
Krishnan, I. A., Muthutamilselvan, K., Ibrahim, M. N. A., Mello, G. D., Ramalingam, S., Maruthai, E., & Arumugam, N. (2021). The application of Aristotle’s rhetorical theory to evaluate fresh graduates’ job interview performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(8), 1009-1028. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i8/10793.
Laksono, I. S. S., Hamamah, H., & Chojimah, N. (2020). Persuasive strategy in Prabowo’s political speech at national agenda 2019. Nusa, 15(2), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.14710/nusa.15.2.214-224.
Malabar, F. (2020). Persuasive language in political campaign. Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature, 1(2), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.37905/jetl.v1i2.7284.
Mensah, O. E., Sarfo-Adu, K., & Afful, J. B. A. (2018). A comparative study of challenger-incumbent strategies in Ghanaian presidential campaign: The case of John Agyekum Kufuor. AFRREV IJAH: An International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 7(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijah.v7i4.1.
Moore, S. (2020). Rhetorical strategies of Forbes’ 2019 most valuable brands. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 11(1), 64-73.
Nurkhamidah, N., Fahira, R. Z., & Ningtyas, A. R. (2021). Rhetorical analysis of Joe Biden’s inauguration address. JL3T (Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching), 7(2), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v7i2.3371.
Osman, W. H., Musa, M. A. H., Rahim, S. A., & Tobi, B. (2021). Aristotle’s triad of persuasiveness in English language writers’ written text. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 6(41), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.35631/jepc.641002.
Papadopoulos, I., & Ypsilandis, G. (2017). Towards an understanding of the persuasive profile of teenaged Greek EFL learners. Journal of Applied Languages and Linguistics, 1(1), 61-75.
Rahmanita, A. (2021). An analysis of persuasive strategies used in slogan woman cosmetic products “Safi” advertisement on Instagram. Indonesian Journal of Education, Social Sciences and Research (IJESSR), 3(1), 34-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.30596%2Fijessr.v3i1.9892.
Saeed, U., Aslam, M. Z., Khan, A., Khan, M., Atiq, M., & Bhatti, H. (2020). Rhetorical and persuasive strategies employed by Imran Khan in his victory speech: A socio-political discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(2), 349-356. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n2p349.
Sameer, I. H. (2017). Rhetorical and linguistic analysis of Bush’s second inaugural speech. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.1p.44.
Shabani, S. (2017). Persuasive strategies towards racial appeal in Tony Morrison’s The Bluest Eye. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(1), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.19.
Shabrina, I. (2016). Persuasive stratgies used in Hillary Clinton’s political campaign speech. Malang: State Islamic University of Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Shah, N. (2020). Employability of persuasive and rhetorical strategies: A corpus-assisted crititacal discourse analysis of Prime Minister Imran Khan’s selected address. Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 4(2), 56-78.
Soedjarwo, G. N. (2020). Persuasion act in The Proposal movie. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 2(1), 50-67. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v2i1.50-67.
Supeno. (2018). Rhetorical analysis of English students’ business expressions: A research paper. A Journal of Culture English Language Teaching Literature & Linguistics, 5(2), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.22219/celticumm.vol5.no2.58-66.
Tayyab, M., Zafran, F., Hussain, M., Sattar, M., & Iqbal, Z. (2021). Political persuasion by Premier Imran Khan At Un General Assembly 74th session. Palarch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(8), 1513-1524.
Ting, S. H. (2018). Ethos, logos, and pathos in university students’ informal requests. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 18(1), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1801-14.
Ting, S. H., & Jerome, C. (2018). Framing of disease risk messages in airport banners. International Journal of Law Government and Communication, 2(6), 63-75.
Torto, R. T. (2020). Aristotelian rhetorical theory as framework for analyzing advertising texts in the print media in Ghana. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(3), 269-283. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1003.02.
Triana, Y., Maftukhin, & Nugroho, A. (2022). The role of pragmatic strategies on university campaign. Notion: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 4(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v4i1.5684 Article.
Wardaugh, R., & Aitchison, J. (1987). An introduction to sociolinguistics. The British Journal of Sociology, 38(3), 436-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/590702.
Zahra, F., & Arts, F. (2021). Visual rhetoric: Framing the methodology for truck visuals through visual rhetoric theory and rhetorical appeals. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 15(9), 409-418.
Copyright (c) 2022 Yufita Ria Oktiani, Evi Jovita Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)