Thematic Progression in EFL Learners’ Writing: A Literature Review

Authors

  • Sri Wuli Fitriati Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)
  • Nurjannah Mutiara Gayatri Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v15i2.7645

Keywords:

thematic progression, EFL learners' writing, text coherence, text cohesion

Abstract

By examining relevant research articles published in reputable journals or conference proceedings in 2013-2020, the literature review article attempted to shed light on the areas: (1) contributions of thematic progression to the coherence and cohesion quality of EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners’ writing, (2) EFL learners’ problems regarding thematic progression in their writing, and (3) research on pedagogical implications of thematic progression on teaching writing. While there have been extensive studies on thematic progression, it remained intriguing to investigate the extent to which this topic had been explored by scholars, particularly in the context of English as a foreign language. The previous studies had consistently confirmed the following results: (1) thematic progression contributes to the coherence and cohesion quality of EFL learners’ writing, (2) problematic thematic progression in EFL learners’ writing included the emergence of the brand new theme, double rheme, empty rheme, empty theme, overuse of constant theme pattern, overwhelming selection of textual theme, and (3) some studies evidenced good results of integrating thematic progression in teaching writing. The research suggests that further research develops a more detailed and systematic procedure of teaching thematic progression in a specific EFL teaching-learning context by integrating thematic progression theory with English language teaching materials. Furthermore, the research calls for more experimental research on teaching thematic progression to determine the significance of this method in enhancing students’ writing quality.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biographies

Sri Wuli Fitriati, Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)

 English Language and Literature Department 

Nurjannah Mutiara Gayatri, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Nurjannah Mutiara Gayatri is an English language teacher at a public junior high school in Boyolali, Central Java. She is a Master's student in English language education at the Graduate Program of Universitas Negeri Semarang.

References

Al-Bazzaz, M. A., & Al-Shajlawi, A. N. (2018). Thematic progression in Iraqi scientific articles. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(12), 126-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.30845/ijll.v5n2a15.

Anwar, I., & Amri, Z. (2019). Thematic patterns in discussion texts written by the third-year students of English department of Universitas Negeri Padang. Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT). Padang, Indonesia. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200306.005.

Arunsirot, S. (2013). An analysis of textual metafunction in Thai EFL students’ writing. Novitas-Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 7(2), 160-174.

Babaii, E., Atai M. R., & Shoja L. (2016). A comparison of thematic choices and thematic progression patterns in the research articles of international and national disciplines. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 33-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/ijal.19.2.33.

Chang, P., Tsai C. C., & Chen P. J. (2020). Organization strategies in EFL expository essays in a content-based language learning course. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 183-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00464-2.

Dewi, M. W., Hernawan, K. F., & Apsari, Y. (2019). Thematic progression in students’ descriptive texts. Professional Journal of English Education, 2(2), 126-132.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd Ed.). New York: Continuum.

Emilia, E., Habibi, N., & Bangga, L. A. (2018). An analysis of cohesion of exposition texts: An Indonesian context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 515-523. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9791.

Gunawan, W., & Aziza, F. (2017). Theme and thematic progression of undergraduate thesis: Investigating meaning making in academic writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 413-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8350.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th Ed.). New York: Routledge.

Hawes, T. (2015). Thematic progression in the writing of students and professionals. Ampersand, 2, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002.

Khany, R., & Nejad, A. M. (2018). The interaction between rhetorical structure and thematisation in academic research articles. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 47-72.

Kuswoyo, H., Sujatna, E. T. S., Indrayani, L., & Rido, A. (2020). Theme choice and thematic progression of discussion section in Engineering English lectures. ICLIQE 2020: Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education. Pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3452194.

Kuswoyo, H., & Susardi. (2017). Problems on SFG thematic progression in ESL academic writing. Leksema: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 2(1), 1-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v2i1.655.

Leong, A. P., Toh, A. L. L., & Chin, S. F. (2018). Examining structure in scientific research articles: A study of thematic progression and thematic density. Written Communication, 35(3), 286-314. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741088318767378.

Lestari, S. H. P., Mujiyanto, J., & Saleh, M. (2019). The use of thematic progression in the journal artcile of U-JET. English Education Journal, 9(4), 554-558.

Linda., Maisa., & Mulatsih, D. (2017). The use of thematic progression in writing hortatory exposition text. Academic Journal Perspective: Language, Education, and Literature, 5(2), 125-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v5i2.679.

Na-on, R., & Jaturapitakkul, N. (2017). Identifying thematic and rhetorical patterns in research project abstracts of Thai EFL engineering undergraduates. LEARN Journal, 10(2), 71-89.

Nurdianingsih, F., & Purnama, Y. I. (2017). The effect of thematic progression pattern toward students’ writing expository paragraph. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 158, 288-294. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-17.2017.52.

Pangestu, G., Harvian, E. D., & Suprijadi, D. (2019). Thematic progression in students’ descriptive text. Professional Journal of English Education, 2(4), 575-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.22460/project.v2i4.p575-580.

Pasaribu, A. N., Pasaribu, T. K., & Panggabean, S. (2019). Thematic progression of students’ narrative writing. Jurnal Ilmiah Simantek, 3(2), 155-163.

Rahmawati, R. V., & Kurniawan, E. (2015). Thematic progression analysis in Indonesian EFL students’ thesis abstracts. Indonesian EFL Journal, 1(1), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v1i1.617.

Stoian, C. E. (2017). The importance of thematic structure in teaching translation. Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timişoara Transactions on Modern Languages, 16(1), 35-44.

Sujatna, E. T. S., Pamungkas, K., & Heriyanto. (2018). Thematic progression of higher education advertorials: A case study in English and Bahasa Indonesia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 5(8), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.58.4655.

Suwandi. (2016). Coherence and cohesion: An analysis of the final project abstracts of the undergraduate students of PGRI Semarang. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1349.

Xiao, X. M. (2017). Thematic progression theory and its application in EAP writing. The 2nd International Conference on Education and Development (ICED). https://doi.org/10.12783/dtssehs%2Ficed2017%2F15119.

Yunita, S. (2018). Theme and thematic progression in students’ recount text. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 524-530. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9797.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-30
Abstract 1501  .
PDF downloaded 921  .