I am falling in love, Ouch!: Ontological metaphors at work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v14i1.6343Keywords:
in- preposition, conceptual metaphor, ontological function, spatial prepositionAbstract
The research aimed to track the distribution of in metaphors and explore their ontological function in the abstracts of English research articles in the sub-disciplines of theoretical linguistics and pragmatics. The lack of empirical evidence on the subject had become the inspiration to base the research on a corpus. The corpus consisted of 40 research article abstracts; 20 from Journal of Linguistics and another 20 from Journal of Pragmatics. By using a quantitative method, the results show that theoretical linguistics abstracts are more densely populated with ‘in’ metaphors. However, in terms of in-preposition phrase topic complement variations, they are less varied. Qualitatively, the results confirm a notion proposed by Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) that ‘in’ metaphors function cognitively by providing ontological status to abstract objects. Their existence proves to play an important role in academic texts.
Plum Analytics
References
Alousque, I. N. (2015). The role of text in the identification of visual metaphor in advertising. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212, 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.379.
Beger, A. (2016). Different functions of (deliberate) metaphor in teaching scientific concepts. Metaphorik, 26, 61-86.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Bultmann, M. N., Wheeler, N., Jimenez, T., & Arndt, J. (2019). Grasping for metaphors: Identity ambiguity contributes to the preference for metaphor usage. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(5-6), 764-776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19894032.
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London/New York: Continuum.
Carbonell, J., Sánchez-Esguevillas, A., & Carro, B. (2016). The role of metaphors in the development of technologies: The case of the artificial intelligence. Futures, 84, 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.019.
Castellane, A., & Paternotte, C. (2018). Knowledge transfer without knowledge? The case of agentive metaphors in biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 72, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.05.002.
Catalano, T., & Musolff, A. (2019). “Taking the Shackles off”: Metaphor and metonymy of migrant children and border officials in the U.S. Metaphoric, 29, 11-46.
Chan, A. S., & Yap, F. H. (2015). “Please continue to be an anime lover”: The use of defamation metaphors in Hong Kong electoral discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 87, 31-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.07.001.
Chanturidze, M., Carroll, R., & Ruigendijk, E. (2019). Prepositions as a hybrid between lexical and functional category: Evidence from an ERP study on German sentence processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100857.
Chen, H., & Xu, H. (2019). Quantitative linguistics approach to interlanguage development: A study based on the Guangwai-Lancaster Chinese Learner Corpus. Lingua, 230, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102736.
Domínguez, M. (2015). The metaphorical species: Evolution, adaptation and speciation of metaphors. Discourse Studies, 17(4), 433-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615578963.
Egan, T. (2015). Manner and path: Evidence from a multilingual corpus. CogniTextes, 12, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.788.
Filipczuk-Rosińska, S. (2016). “Please continue to be an anime lover”: The use of defamation metaphors in Hong Kong electoral discourse. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 329-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.049.
Forceville, C., & Paling, S. (2018). The metaphorical representation of depression in short, wordless animation films. Visual Communication, 0(0), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218797994.
Goatly, A. (2005). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge.
Hardjanto, T. D. (2017). Common discourse patterns of cross-disciplinary research article abstracts in English. Humaniora., 29(1), 72-84. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/issue/view/2665.
Herrmann, J. B. (2013). Metaphor in academic discourse. Amsterdam: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.
Hoang, H., & Boers, F. (2018). Gauging the association of EFL learners’ writing proficiency and their use of metaphorical language. System, 74, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.02.004.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. (2006). A student’s introduction to English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
Izgarjan, A., & Djurić, D. (2016). Metaphors of the future and the power of images in the British TV drama Spooks. Futures, 84, 154-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.016.
Kashkan, G. V, Provalova, N. V, Sukhalentceva, N. A., & Bayarjargal, E. (2015). Medical metaphor as an instrument of increasing performance of international students from the Preparatory Department. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 215, 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.574.
Killick, S., Curry, V., & Myles, P. (2016). The mighty metaphor: A collection of therapists’ favourite metaphors and analogies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kumar, M. A., Rajendran, S., & Soman, K. P. (2015). Crosslingual preposition disambiguation for machine translation. Procedia Computer Science, 54, 291-300. https:/doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.06.034.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd Ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lee, Y. E., Yoo, I. W. H., & Shin, Y. K. (2020). The use of English prepositions in lexical bundles in essays written by Korean university students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 100848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100848.
Mishankina, N. A., & Zheleznyakova, A. N. (2015). The problem of linguistic analysis of musical metaphors at lessons of Russian as a foreign language. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 215, 316-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.640.
Moore, D., Fraser, S., Törrönen, J., & Tinghög, M. E. (2015). Sameness and difference: Metaphor and politics in the constitution of addiction, social exclusion and gender in Australian and Swedish drug policy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26(4), 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.01.011.
Mujagić, M. (2018). Dangerous waters metaphor in news discourse on refugee crisis. Metaphorik.De, 28, 99-132.
O’Rourke, T., & de Diego Balaguer, R. (2020). Names and their meanings: A dual-process account of propername encoding and retrieval. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 108, 308-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.005.
Obert, A., Gierski, F., & Caillies, S. (2018). He catapulted his words from the dais: An ERP investigation of novel verbal metaphors. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 47, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.02.008.
Omidian, T., Shahriari, H., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2018). A cross-disciplinary investigation of multiword expressions in the moves of research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.08.002.
Pannese, A., Rappaz, M., & Grandjean, D. (2016). Metaphor and music emotion: Ancient views and future directions. Consciousness and Cognition, 44, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.06.015.
Pendrous, R., Hulbert-Williams, L., Hochard, K. D., & Hulbert-Williams, N. J. (2020). Appetitive augmental functions and common physical properties in a pain-tolerance metaphor: An extended replication. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 16, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.02.003.
Pérez-Marín, D., Hijón-Neira, R., Bacelo, A., & Pizarro, C. (2020). Can computational thinking be improved by using a methodology based on metaphors and scratch to teach computer programming to children? Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.027.
Raja, V. (2019). From metaphor to theory: the role of resonance in perceptual learning. Adaptive Behavior, 27(6), 405-421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712319854350.
Roberts, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & Middleton, A. (2019). Popular culture and genetics; friend, foe or something more complex? European Journal of Medical Genetics, 62(5), 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.12.005.
Roldán-Riejos, A., & Cuadrado, G. (2015). Metaphor and figurative meaning construction in Science and Technology (English and Spanish). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212, 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.348.
Saint-Dizier, P. (2006). Introduction to the Syntax and Semantics of prepositions. In P. Saint-Dizier (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 29. (pp. 1-25). Berlin: Springer.
Sato, M., Schafer, A. J., & Bergen, B. K. (2015). Metaphor priming in sentence production: Concrete pictures affect abstract language production. Acta Psychologica, 156, 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.010.
Scott, M. (2016). WordSmith Tools version 7. Lexical Analysis Software.
Sulpizio, S., & Job, R. (2018). Early and multiple-loci divergency of proper and common names: An eventrelated potential investigation. Neuropsychologia, 119, 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.034.
Szawerna, M. (2018). Visual metaphorization of events as objects in comics. Language, Mind and Culture, 2, 150-189. https://doi.org/10.32058/LAMICUS-2018-006.
Tasić, M., & Stamenković, D. (2015). The interplay of words and images in expressing multimodal metaphors in comics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212, 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.308.
Terry, A. (2019). The representativeness of the metaphors of death, disease, and sex in a TV series corpus. CogniTextes, 19, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.1730.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vo, S. (2019). Use of lexical features in non-native academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.11.002.
Wintzer, J. (2019). The visualization of migration. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919844100.
Wu, X., Mauranen, A., & Lei, L. (2020). Syntactic complexity in English as a lingua franca academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100798.
Yi, E., Koenig, J. P., & Roland, D. (2019). Semantic similarity to high-frequency verbs affects syntactic frame selection. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(3), 601-628. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0029.
Zane, E., & Shafer, V. (2018). Mixed metaphors: Electrophysiological brain responses to (un)expected concrete and abstract prepositional phrases. Brain Research, 1680, 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.12.008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Lingua Cultura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
