Considering All (Non) Living Things: A Biocentric Orientation in Blair Richmond’s The Lithia Trilogy

Authors

  • Ida Farida Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Yudi Permadi Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Trisha Adelia Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Nolly Liviani Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i1.5522

Keywords:

biocentric orientation, young adult literature, ecocriticism

Abstract

This research elucidated the perspective of The Lithia Trilogy (Out of Breath, The Ghost Runner, and The Last Mile), written by Blair Richmond, towards the environment. It was executed based on ecocriticism, a research method which focused on the exploration of environmental issues in literary works. The theory was taken from Laurence Buell on the meaning of ecocriticism. From the analysis of the structure of the novels, it was found that the trilogy presented the idea of biocentrism, an assumption that the earth and all of the living things on it had the right to fulfill their needs. Biocentrism was the opposing concept of anthropocentrism, both of which were studied in environmental ethics. Two issues of conflicts were presented in this trilogy: herbivores versus omnivores and environmentalists versus capitalists. The result of the research reveals that the novels suggest not to eat animals to save fauna and introduce the Gaia hypothesis to save all living and non-living things on the earth. In other words, the novel tends to have a biocentric orientation. As one work of young adult literature, this trilogy explicitly teaches those suggestions to the readers, especially young readers.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biographies

Ida Farida, Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Padjadjaran

Department of Literature and Cultural Studies, Unpad

Yudi Permadi, Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Padjadjaran

Department of Literature and Cultural Studies, Unpad

Trisha Adelia, Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Padjadjaran

English Studies Program, Unpad

Nolly Liviani, Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Padjadjaran

English Studies Program, Unpad

References

Adkins, P. (2017). The eyes of that cow: Eating animals and theorizing vegetarianism in James Joyce’s “Ulysses”. Humanities, 6(46), 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/h6030046.

Barry, G. (2014). Terrestrial ecosystem loss and biosphere collapse. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 25(5), 542-563. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-06-2013-0069.

Bell, K. (2015). Can the capitalis economic system deliver environmental justice? Environmental Research Letters, 10, 1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125017.

Buell, L., Heise, U. K., & Thornber, K. (2011). Literature and environment. The Annual Reviews on Environment and Resources, 36, 417-440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-111109-144855.

Crane, K. (2014). Vellum, visions, and pastoral transposition. The Journal of Ecocriticism: A New Journal of Nature, Society, and Literature, 6(1), 1-12.

Erb, C. (2014). A spiritual blockbuster: Avatar, environmentalism, and the new religions. Journal of Film and Video, 66(3), 3-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.5406/jfilmvideo.66.3.0003.

Johns-Putra, A. (2016). My job is to take care of you: Climate change, humanity, and Cormac McCarthy’s “The Road”. Journal: Modern Fiction Studies (MFS), 62(3), 519-540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2016.0041.

Kérchy, A. (2017). Vegetal visions: Ecocritical encounters with plant kin in transmediated fairy tales. Americana E-Journal, Interspecies Dialogues in Post Millenial Filmic Fantasies, 13(2). http://americanaejournal.hu/vol13no2.

Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Taylor, B., & Piccolo, J. J. (2018). Anthropocentrism: More than just a misunderstood problem. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(1), 109-127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9711-1.

Monzavi, M., Murad, M. H. S. A., Rahnama, M., Shamshirband, S. (2017). Historical path of traditional and modern idea of ‘Conscious Universe’. Quality and Quantity Journal, 51(3), 1183-1195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0324-3.

Noda, A. A. L. (2018). Reconstructing the wilderness: Finding identity, culture, and values in Filipino children’s Literature. The Journal of Ecocriticism: A New Journal of Nature, Society, and Literature, 8(1), 1-8.

Park, J. T. (2015). Climate Change and Capitalism. Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development, 14(2), 189-206.

Richmond, B. (2011). Out of breath. Oregon: Ashland Creek Press.

Richmond, B. (2012). The ghost runner. Oregon: Ashland Creek Press.

Richmond, B. (2014). The last mile. Oregon: Ashland Creek Press.

Sampaolo, M. (2018). Food chain; Ecology. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/science/food-chain.

Sukmawan, S. (2018). Environmental wisdom in oral literature of Arjuna slopes people. Lingua Cultura, 12(1), 1-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i1.1459.

Tienhaara, K. (2014). Varieties of green capitalism: Economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis. Environmental Politics, 23(2), 187-204.

doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.821828.

Waldmüller, J. M. (2015). Living well rather than living better: Measuring biocentric human-nature rights and human-nature development in Ecuador. The International Journal of Social Quality, 5(2), 7-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.3167/IJSQ.2015.050202.

Zhengwen, L. (2018). Retailing and retelling: Capitalism and nature in ‘A Monk Walks in Orchard Road’. The Journal of Ecocriticism, 8(1), 1-5.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-21
Abstract 1131  .
PDF downloaded 314  .