The Optimal Age of the Second-First Language Acquisition: The Relationship of Language and Physical-Motor Development

Authors

  • Budi Setiawan STIA & Pemerintahan Annisa Dwi Salfaritzi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i1.5324

Keywords:

optimal children age, the second-first language acquisition

Abstract

This research highlighted the language and physical-motor relationship and aimed to find the optimal age for the beginning of the second-first language (2L1) acquisition. The respondents of this research were 50 millennial generations of Chinese families whose children were 0-5 years old. Some children could communicate in Chinese and Indonesian language. Chinese-Indonesian families were chosen by considering their bilingual. This research employed qualitative data which were collected from observations and questionnaires given to parents. The collected data were analyzed by classifying the data into some specific intervals of age based on the language milestones. This research finds that the highest frequency of the beginning in the simultaneous second-first language education is at 13-15 months. This research also proves that the age between 13-15 months is an optimal age to begin educating the second language regarded as the first language for bilingual families.

Author Biography

Budi Setiawan, STIA & Pemerintahan Annisa Dwi Salfaritzi

He is now pursuing his doctoral degree at Departmen Humanity Science, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia

References

Ali, H., & Purwandi, L. (2017). Millennial nusantara: Pahami karakternya, rebut simpatinya. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Armstrong, K. H., Ogg, J. A., Sundman-Wheat, A. N., & Walsh, A. S. J. (2014). Evidence-based interventions for children with challenging behavior. US: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7807-2.

Berman, R. A. (2017). Language development and literacy. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32132-5_19-2.

Blommaert, J. (2016). From mobility to complexity in sociolinguistic theory and method. In N. Coupland (Ed), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449787.012.

Ghassabian, A., Sundaram, R., Bell, E., Bello, S. C., Kus, C., & Yeung, E. (2016). Gross motor milestones and subsequent development. Pediatrics, 138(1), 1−8. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-4372.

Keenan, T., Evans, S., & Crowley, K. (2016). An introduction to child development. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Libertus, K., & Violi, D. A. (2016). Sit to talk: Relation between motor skills and language development in infancy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1−8.

Meniado, J. C. (2016). First language acquisition: A case study of a three-year old Lebanese child. Journal of Child Language Acquisition and Development, 4(3), 98−112.

Nau, N. (2015). First and second language acquisition: Towards a reconcillation. Lingua Posnaniensis, 56(1), 125−140. https://doi.org/10.2478/linpo-2014-0008.

Ramirez, N. F., & Kuhl, P. (2017). The brain science of bilingualism. YC Young Children, 72(2), 38−44.

Walle, E. A., & Campos, J. J. (2014). Infant language development is related to the acquisition of walking. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033238.

Wang, M. V., Lekhal, R., Aaro, L. E., Holte, A., Schjolberg, S. (2014). The developmental relationship between language and motor performance from 3 to 5 years of age: A prospective longitudinal population study. BMC Psychology, 2(34), 1-10.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-15