Validity and Reliability of Resilience Scale for Islamic Boarding School Students
Keywords:content validity, content reliability, resilience scale, school students
The research aimed to examine the content validity and resilience scale reliability that was developed based on the theory of Reivich and Shatte. The measuring instrument consisted of 32 items which resulted from a modification of the instruments made by Reivich and Shatte. The instrument had seven aspects of resilience, namely emotion regulation, impulse control, optimism, causal analysis, empathy, self-efficacy, and reaching out. The research sample amounted to 150 respondents consisting of Islamic Boarding School students in Purworejo, Central Java, boys and girls aged 11-18 years. The items in the measuring instruments were analyzed using the Gregory formula with the help of Ms. Excel program; then, the Cronbach Alpha formula was analyzed using the SPSS program. Based on the analysis of content validity with two experts’ judgments and the validity index of 1, it means that the instrument’s validity is very high. As for the reliability test results, the value of Cronbach’s Alpha item resilience scale is 0,753. This shows that the resilience scale item has good reliability. Based on these data, resilience instruments can be said to be valid and reliable to measure the resilience of Islamic Boarding School students.
Adamson, K. A., & Prion, S. (2013). Reliability: Measuring internal consistency using Cronbach’s Alpha. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(5), 179-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2012.12.001.
Azwar, S. (2019). Reabilitas dan validitas (4th Ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Baek, H. S., Lee, K. U., Joo, E. J., Lee, M. Y., & Choi, K. S. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale. Psychiatry Investigation, 7(2), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.109.
Bahryni, S., Bermas, H., & Tashvighi, M. (2016). The self-efficacy forecasting based on hope to life and resiliency in adolescents suffering form cancer. Biomedical & Pharmachology Journal, 9(3), 1147-1156. https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1062.
Basim, H. N., & Cetin, F. (2011). The reliability and validity of the resilience scale for adults-Turkish version. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 22(2), 104-114.
Farkas, D., & Orosz, G. (2015). Ego-resiliency reloaded: A three-component model of general resiliency. Plos One, 10(03), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.14755/MTAKIK.2014.0001.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gonzalez, S. P., Moore, E. W. G., Newton, M., & Galli, N. A. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in competitive sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 23, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.10.005.
Harvey, J., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2004). Psychological resilience in disadvantaged youth: A critical overview. Australian Psychologist, 39(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060410001660281.
Hendriani, W. (2018). Positive meaning: The typical coping of resilient person towards changing conditions become individual with disability. Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies (IJDS), 5(2), 157-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.IJDS.2018.005.02.2.
Hidayati, K. (2012). Validasi instrumen non tes dalam penelitian pendidikan Matematika. Prosiding Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY. Yogyakarta, Indonesia. pp. 503-511.
Hjemdal, O., Friborg, O., Braun, S., Kempenaers, C., Linkowski, P., & Fossion, P. (2011). The resilience scale for adults: Construct validity and measurement in a Belgian sample. International Journal of Testing, 11(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2010.508570.
Janti, S. (2014). Analisis validitas dan reliabilitas dengan skala Likert terhadap pengembangan SI/TI dalam penentuan pengambilan keputusan penerapan strategic planning pada industri garmen. Prociding Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Sains & Teknologi (SNAST). Yogyakarta, Indonesia. pp. 155-160.
Luthar, S. S. (2003). Resilience and vulnerability: Adaption in the context of childhood adversities. Cambridge: Cambridge Universitu Press.
Nishi, D., Uehara, R., Kondo, M., & Matsuoka, Y. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the resilience scale and its short version. BMC Research Notes, 3(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-310.
Reivich, K., & Shatte, A. (2002). The resiliency factor: Seven keys to finding your inner strength and overcoming life’s hurdles. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Sagone, E., & Indiana, M. L. (2017). The relationship of positive affect with resilience and self-efficacy in life skills in Italian adolescents. Scientific Research Publishing, 8(13), 2226-2239. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.813142.
Santrock, J. W. (2012). Adolescence (15th Ed.). New York: Mc Graw Hill Education.
Setiawati, F. A. (2014). Perbandingan berbagai metode penskalaan yang dikembangkan Thurstone. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan UNY, 7(1), 86-93. https://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v7i1.3114.
Setiawati, F. A., Mardapi, D., & Azwar, S. (2013). Penskalaan teori klasik instrumen multiple intelligences tipe Thurstone dan Likert. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(2), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v17i2.1699.
Sholichatun, Y. (2008). Pengembangan resiliensi santri pondok pesantren (Catatan hasil aktivitas pengabdian masyarakat). Malang: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Islam Negeri Malang.
Shultz, K. S., Whitney, D. J., & Zickar, M. J. (2005). Measurement theory in action: Case studies and exercises (3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Sinnott, J. D. (2013). Positive psychology: Advances in understanding adult motivation. New York: Springer Publishing.
Supriyanto, A., & Hendiani, N. (2018a). Self-efficacy scale fro people with drug abuse disorders. JKI (Jurnal Konseling Indonesia), 3(2), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.21067/jki.v3i2.2318.
Supriyanto, A., & Hendiani, N. (2018b). Self-efficacy level to recover from addiction in substance users in the center for drug rehabilitation. Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 8(2), 114-121. http://doi.org/10.25273/counsellia.v8i2.2944.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s Alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
Widhiarso, W. (2009). Estimasi reliabilitas pengukuran dalam pendekatan model persamaan struktural. Buletin Psikologi, 17(1), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.22146/bpsi.11480.
Copyright (c) 2020 Destiana Rizki Hayatini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)