The Perceived Views of Principals and Supervisors towards Their Ethical Leadership in Some Selected Primary Schools of Eastern Ethiopia
Keywords:principal views, supervisor views, ethical leadership, primary schools
The research’s objectives were to assess the extent to which principals and supervisors practice ethical code of conduct in leading teachers in primary schools, identify differences among leaders related to their personal characteristics, and identify immoral practices leaders experience in the schools. The research participants were 120 principals, 63 supervisors, and 62 teachers selected using stratified and available sampling techniques. The quantitative data obtained through questionnaire were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings of the research reveal that school leaders are moderately ethical in their schools’ administration. There is no significant difference in the dimensions of ethical leadership practice with reference to positions and fields of study school leaders possess. However, there is a significant difference in experience in a leadership position and academic qualification as well as between males and females. Teachers perceive that school leaders use mainly deception, abuse, harassment of subordinates, diminished dignity of employees, and breach of the agreement. It is suggested that school leaders should have professional scaffolding and training in fostering ethical leadership behavior to lead schools successfully. Those interested may conduct more detailed research considering secondary schools.
Amsale, F., Bekele, M., & Tafesse, M. (2016). The ethical behaviors of educational leaders in Ethiopian public universities: The case of the western cluster universities. European Scientific Journal, 12(13), 359-379. https://doi:10.19044/esj.2016.v12n13p359.
Arar, K., Haj, I., Abramovitz, R., & Oplatka, I. (2016). Ethical leadership in education and its relation to ethical decision-making: The case of Arab school leaders in Israel. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(6), 647-660. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2015-0101.
Bowen, C., Bessette, H., & Cham, T. C. (2006). Including ethics in the study of educational leadership. Journal of College and Character, 7(7), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-1639.1241.
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed). London: Routledge Falmer.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Education research: Planning, conducting, evaluating, quantitative and qualitative research. United states of America: Pearson Education, inc.
Downe, J., Cowell, R., & Morgan, K. (2016). What determines ethical behavior in public organizations: Is it rules or leadership? Public Administration Review, 76(6), 898-909. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12562.
Florida Department of Education. (2008). Florida Educational Leadership Standard 10 Ethical Leadership: The William Cecil Golden school leadership development program. Retrieved on April 17th, 2019 from www.floridaschoolleaders.org.
Hassan, S., Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). Ethical and empowering leadership and leader effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(2), 133-146. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1108/02683941311300252.
Hassan, S., Wright, B. E., &Yukl, G. (2014). Does ethical leadership matter in government? Effects on organizational commitment, absenteeism, and willingness to report ethical problems. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12216.
Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. (2011). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2010.12.007.
Kocabaş, I., & Karakouml, T. (2009). Ethics in school administration. African Journal of Business Management, 3(4), 126-130. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM.9000266.
Langlois, L., Lapointe, C., Valois, P., & de Leeuw, A. (2014). Development and validity of the ethical leadership questionnaire. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 310-331. https://doi:10.1108/JEA-10-2012-0110.
Mark, R. L. (2001). Introduction to behavioral sciences. (3rd Ed). USA: Allyn& Bacon, Pearson Education Company.
Mihelič, K. K., Lipičnik, B., & Tekavčič, M. (2010). Ethical leadership. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 14(5), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.19030/ijmis.v14i5.11.
Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2016). Educational research (11th Ed). New Jersey: Pearson.
MOE. (2015). Education sector development Program (ESDP-V). Addis Ababa: Program Action Plan, Federal Ministry of Education.
Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice. California: SAGE Publications.
Perry, J. L. (2015). Revisiting the core of our good government ethos. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 186-187.
Svara, J. H. (2014). Who are the keepers of the code? Articulating and upholding ethical standards in the field of public administration. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 561-569. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12230.
Vanderstoep, S. W., & Johnson, D. D. (2008). Research methods for everyday life: Blending qualitative and quantitative approaches. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Weinberg, H. (2014). Ethical leadership in public services: A solid foundation for good government. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 344-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12226.
Yamane, T. (1967). Elementary sampling theory. NewYork: Hamper.
Yukl, G., Mahsud, R., Hassan, S., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). An improved measure of ethical leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1548051811429352.
Copyright (c) 2020 Birhanu Sintayehu Alemu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)