New Democracy in Digital Era through Social Media and News Online

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v11i1.6182

Keywords:

new democracy, digital era, social media, news online

Abstract

The research aimed to explain the pattern of social communication on the issue of rejection of the PLTU Batang development policy. It used data on Twitter accounts involved in the rejection of the PLTU Batang development policy. In analyzing existing data, qualitative methods and social analysis networks were used. To see social networks in the rejection of the PLTU Batang development policy, the research used the NodeXL application to find out the patterns of social communication networks in #TolakPLTUBatang. From the results, it can be seen that in the dissemination of social networking information, the @praditya_wibby account is the most central account in the social network and has a strong influence on the social network. The @praditya_wibby account has a role in moving the community through Twitter to make a critical social movement. This means that in the current digital era, democracy enters a new form through the movement of public opinion delivery through social media. Besides, by encouraging the role of online news, the distribution of information becomes faster to form new perceptions of an issue. This is evident from the correlation network where the @praditya_wibby account has correlations with several compass online media accounts, tirto.id, okezonenews, vice, antaranews, BBCIndonesia, and CNN Indonesia.

Author Biographies

Abitassha Az Zahra, Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta

Deptartement of Government Affairs and Administration, Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universutas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Eko Priyo Purnomo, Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta

Department of Government Affairs and Administration, Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universutas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Aulia Nur Kasiwi, Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta

Departement of Government Affairs and Administration, Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universutas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

References

Bertot, J. C. (2019). Social media, open platforms, and democracy: Transparency enabler, slayer of democracy, both? Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii, USA. pp 7835-7844.

Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Journal Information, Communication and Information, 18(5), 524-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542.

Carty, V., & Barron, F. G. R. (2019). Social movements and new technology: The dynamics of cyber activism in the digital age. In B. Berberoglu (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Social Movements, Revolution, and Social Transformation (pp. 373–397). New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92354-3_16.

DeNardis, L., & Hackl, A. M. (2015). Internet governance by social media platforms. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.04.003.

Dharmawan, A. (2015). Kritik netizen terhadap nekrokultura media mainstream (Studi demokrasi partisipan weblog Kompasiana). Jurnal Simbolika: Research and Learning in Communication Study, 1(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.31289/simbollika.v1i1.47.

Eom, S. J., Hwang, H., & Kim, J. H. (2018). Can social media increase government responsiveness? A case study of Seoul, Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.002.

Harding, N. (2019). Instagraff—The influence of web 2.0, social media, and user-created content upon graffiti culture performed in cyber/space. In D. Akrivos & A. K. Antoniou (Eds.), Crime, Deviance and Popular Culture (pp. 259–286). New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04912-6_11.

Harlow, S. (2012). Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media & Society, 14(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410408.

Insani, N., & Waryanto, N. H. (2012). Penerapan teori Graf pada analisis jejaring sosial dengan menggunakan Microsoft Micrososft Nodexl. Pythagoras: Jurnal Matematika, 7(1), 83-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v7i1.2839.

Kim, H., & Xu, H. (2019). Exploring the effects of social media features on the publics’ responses to decreased usage CSR messages. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-10-2017-0095.

King, G., Schneer, B., & White, A. (2017). How the news media activate public expression and influence national agendas. Science, 358(6364), 776–780. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao1100.

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411-427. doi: 10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188.

Lotan, F. F. (2019). Making a positive internet through Socmed Agawe Guyub. International Journal of Communication and Society, 1(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijcs.v1i1.22.

McKeon, R.T., & Gitomer, D. H. (2019). Social media, political mobilization, and high-stakestesting. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1-14. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00055.

Nurmandi, A. (2014). Social media use: Rethinking Civic engagement in government. Retrived from http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/4491.

Pakpahan, R. (2017). Analisis fenomena hoax di berbagai media sosial dan cara menanggulangi hoax. Konferensi Nasional Ilmu Sosial dan Teknologi, 1(1), 479-484.

Rosenberg, D., Mano, R., & Mesch, G. S. (2019). Absolute monopoly, areas of control or democracy? Examining gender differences in health participation on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.016.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-19

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 385  .
PDF downloaded 183  .