People, Environment, and Future Sebuah Tinjauan atas Kesimpulan Pesimis Mengenai Lingkungan Hidup dan Masa Depan Manusia

Authors

  • Antonius Atosökhi Gea Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v3i1.3322

Keywords:

population, environment, future, change in attitude

Abstract

The study on the environment continuously attracted the attention of many people. The studies are generally based on a sense of concern over the condition of the natural environment and the future of mankind, that is an inseparable part of the natural environment as a whole. From the various existing studies, there is a rather pessimistic and also a more optimistic to look at the future of human beings in relation to the natural environment. One of the pessimistic conclusion is the result of a study conducted by Heilbroner, who  analyze a variety of facts and trends that continue to occur, ranging from the rapid increase in population of the world, environmental problems as well as the war, which was the unintended consequences could be avoided. From the results of his analysis Heilbroner finally came to the pessimists conclusion that no hope for the future of mankind. This conclusion has provoked a lot of debate, associated with the accuracy-related challenges he pointed out, as well as his pessimistic projection about the future of mankind. Based on the review conducted over this negative conclusion it is known that there are the possibility for human beings to be able to fix the situation, raise awareness, change attitudes, do something radically which gives positive impact to the safety of the environment. By making the study of Heilbroner  as a criticism and the triggers for the emergence of higher concern for the environment, we can hope that there is still hope for mankind to a better future.

 

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

References

Chiras, D.D. (1985). Environmental Science: A framework for decision making. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin/Cummings.

Davidson, L., M., Baum, A., & Collins, D.L., (1982). Stress and control-related problems at Three Mile Island. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12(5), 349-359.

Ehrlich, R. (1968). The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine.

Gea, Antonius, dkk (2006). Character Building IV: Relasi dengan Dunia. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Ghina, F. (2003). Sustainable Development in Small Island Developing States. International Coral Reef Action Network (ICRAN), c/o United Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL, UK

Kates, R.W. (1978). Risk assessment of environmental hazards. New York: John Wiley.

Postel, S. (1994). Carring Capacity: Earth’s Bottom Line. Challenge; Mar/Apr 1994; 37, 2; ABI/INFORM Global, pg. 4

Pinchot, G. (1992). The Ecology of Success. Executive Excellence; Oct 1992; 9, 10; ABI/INFORM Global.

Raven, P. (1995). A time of catastrophic extinction - What we must do. The Futurist; Sep 1995; 29, 5; ABI/INFORM Global.

Russell, V., and Arkkelin, D. (1995). Environmental Psychology. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Downloads

Published

2012-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 237  .
PDF downloaded 989  .