Keadilan Hukum Jeremy Bentham dan Relevansinya bagi Praktik Hukum Kontemporer


  • Frederikus Fios Bina Nusantara University



justice, law, contemporary, ethics, utilitarianism


Fair punishment for a condemned has been long debated in the universe of discourse of law and global politics. The debate on the philosophical level was no less lively. Many schools of thought philosophy question, investigate, reflect and assess systematically the ideal model for the subject just punishment in violation of the law. One of the interesting and urgent legal thought Jeremy Bentham, a British philosopher renowned trying to provide a solution in the middle of the debate was the doctrine or theory of utilitarianism. The core idea is that the fair punishment should be a concern for happiness of a condemned itself, and not just for revenge. Bentham thought has relevance in several dimensions such as dimensions of humanism, moral and utility.



Plum Analytics


Bean, P. (1981). Punishment: A Philosophical and Criminological Inquiry. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

Bentham, J. (1960). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

_________. (1962). Principles of Penal Law. New York: Russel and Russel.

Bertens, K. (2001). Ringkasan Sejarah Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Cragg, W. (1992). The Practical Punishment: Towards a Theory of Restorative Justice. London, New York: Routledge.

Holyer, R. (1994). Capital Punishment and the Sancrity of Life. International Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. XXXIV, No. 4 Issue No. 136.

Ohoitimur, Y. (1997). Teori Etika tentang Hukuman Legal. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Plamenatz, J. (1966). English Utilitarians. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Prawironegoro, D. (2010). Filsafat Ilmu. Jakarta: Nusantara Consulting.

Teichmann, J. (1998). Etika Sosial. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Wood, A. (1990). Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.






Abstract 3084  .
PDF downloaded 31095  .