Penghakiman oleh Pers Nasional: Suatu Kritik atas Kebebasan Pers dalam Pemberitaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Authors

  • Vidya Prahassacitta Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v5i1.3013

Keywords:

freedom of press, presumption of innocent principle, trial by the press

Abstract

The 1998 reform in Indonesia has changed freedom press in Indonesia. Now press implements libertarian model which puts freedom first instead of responsibility. Previously, press implemented soviet communist model which put responsibility first instead of freedom. Fifteen years later, press in Indonesia has become political tool by the owner of the press company who has high position in political party participating in the 2014 election. This reflects on the disproportional news regarding corruption cases conducted by the government officer or parliament member from the contender party. Such news delivers not only facts but also misleading opinions to the society which creates trial by the press. In fact, presumption of innocent principle is a foundation for press reporting news as stipulated in Law No. 40 Year 1999 concerning Press and Journalistic Code of Conduct. In libertarian press there are always borders but such borders are not effective since the freedom of press in Indonesia is powerful. Article used qualitative and library research with secondary sources of law to gain a solution to this problem. Therefore, Press Board should maximize its function in supervising the implementation of presumption of innocent principle and to raise society awareness regarding the law supremacy. In the end, to fulfill press social responsibility, a press profession court shall be established to keep press independency.

 

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biography

Vidya Prahassacitta, Bina Nusantara University

Business Law Department, Faculty of Humanities

References

Adji, I. S. (2001). Kebebasan Pers: Tuntutan Kebebasan Absolut? Jakarta: Kantor Pengacara dan Konsultan Hukum Prof. Oemar Seno Adji, S.H. dan Rekan.

Adji, I. S. (2008). Hukum dan Kebebasan Pers. Jakarta: Diadit Media.

Adji, I. S., & Adji, W. S. (1995). Pembatalan SIUPP sebagai Sengketa Tata Usaha. M. Elrick (Ed). Kapita Selekta Hukum Mengenang Almarhum Prof. H. Oemar Seno Adji, SH. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. (hal. 254-262).

Adji, O. S. (1977). Mass Media dan Hukum. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Adji, O. S. (1977). Pers Aspek-Aspek Hukum. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Huda, C. (2010). Makna asas praduga tak bersalah dan pemakaiannya dalam praktek pers. Jurnal Dewan Pers. November 2010, (2), 33-44.

Loqman, L. (1996). Percobaan, Penyertaan dan Gabungan Tindak Pidana. Jakarta: Universitas Tarumanega.

Loqman, L. (2010). Asas praduga tak bersalah di dalam pemberitaan oleh media massa. Jurnal Dewan Pers. November 2010, (2), 1-18.

Steele, J. (2013). Trial by the Press: an examination of journalism, ethicts, and islam in Indonesia and Malaysia. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(3), 342-359.

Sukardi, W. A. (2010). Menghindari tuduhan pelanggaran asas praduga tidak bersalah. Jurnal Dewan Pers. November 2010, (2), 19-32.

Downloads

Published

2014-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 433  .
PDF downloaded 323  .