Reader’s Factors in Interpreting Eldorado by Edgar Allan Poe Using Reader-Response Theory: A Preliminary Study

Authors

  • Risa R. Simanjuntak Bina Nusantara University
  • Lia Kristianti Joelianto Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v2i1.2967

Keywords:

reader-response, Eldorado, reader factors, interpretation

Abstract

Article aims to find variety of interpretations on Eldorado poem, following the readers’ internal factors, such as societal norms, personal values and past experiences influence the interpretations. Data generated for this study are acquired through field research, in which questionnaires are used as data collecting instrument. The respondents are from third semester students of English Literature in Bina Nusantara University. The finding shows that interpretations of Eldorado include 44% ideas about failure, 24% ideas about perseverance, and 25.33% ideas about taking a journey. In comparison to Eldorado’s more neutral interpretation, it could be said that more respondents prefer to discuss the poem as the journey of life. It can be concluded that different societal norms, personal values and past experiences cause different kinds of interpretations, in which past experience becomes the most influential factor.

 

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biographies

Risa R. Simanjuntak, Bina Nusantara University

Jurusan Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Bahasa dan Sastra

Lia Kristianti Joelianto, Bina Nusantara University

Jurusan Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Bahasa dan Sastra

References

Arp, T. R. (1997). Perrine’s sound and sense (9th ed.). Troy, US: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Brooks, W. (2006). Reading representations of themselves: Urban youth use culture and african american textual features to develop literary understandings. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(3), 372-392.

Cresswell, T. (2006). On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World, London: Routledge.

Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Harkness, J. A., Braun M., Edwards, B., Johnson T. P., Lyberg L., & Mohler P. Ph., et al., (2010). Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts. Hoboken. US: John Wiley & Sons.

Iser, W. (1980). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, US: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Iser, W. (1972) The Reading Process: a Phenomenological Approach. New Literary History 3: 279-299

Kennedy, J. G. (2006). The portable Edgar Allan Poe. New York, US: Penguin Group.

Lodge, D., & Wood, N. (2000). Modern criticism and theory: A reader. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.

Rosenblatt, L. (1994). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1978).

Sapsford, R., & Jupp, V. (2006). Data collection and analysis. London, UK: The Open University.

Selden, R., Widdowson, P., & Brooker, P. (2005). A reader’s guide to contemporary literary theory. Delhi, India: Pearson Education India.

Tompkins, J. (1980). Reader-Response Criticism from Formalism to Post-structuralism. Baltimore, US: John Hopkins University Press.

Wood, J. (2009). Those who have had trouble can sympathise with you: Press writing, reader responses and a murder trial in interwar Britain. Journal of Social History, 43(2), 439-462.

Downloads

Published

2011-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 459  .
PDF downloaded 290  .