Kampanye Penghentian Klitoridektomi dan Peran Strategis HIMPSI

Authors

  • Reza Indragiri Amriel Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v1i2.2903

Keywords:

female genital mutilation (FGM), women rights, psychological effect, HIMPSI, API

Abstract

If the word “mutilation” entered in internet search engine, pages appear will be about “female genital mutilation” (FGM). Association about mutilation and female genital mutilation gives a negative connotation to “mutilation” term, that is such harmful practical towards women. This connotation affects Indonesia, as according to UNICEF (2005), Indonesia is one of many countries practicing FGM. Besides considering psichological concequences that will harm women, circumcision phenomenon in women unlocks sensitivity in self-judging towards Islam community as the major community in Indonesia. This paper bring up description about FGM and its strategic consideration about psychologic part taken care by Indonesian Psychology Association (HIMPSI) as its future agenda.

 

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

References

Barstow, D.G. (1999). Female genital mutilation: the penultimate gender abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 501–510.

Black, J.A. & Debelle, G.D. (1995). Female genital mutilation in Britain. British Medical Journal, 310, 1590–1592.

Brighouse, R. (1992). Ritual female circumcision and its effects on female sexual function. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 1, 3–10.

Condro, A. (2005) Hentikan Medikalisasi Sunat Perempuan. Artikel Kompas, Rabu, 1 Juni 2005.

Depkes RI (2006) Surat Edaran (SE) Dirjen Bina Kesehatan Masyarakat Nomor HK 00.07.1.31047 a tentang Larangan Medikalisasi Sunat Perempuan bagi Petugas Kesehatan. Tertanggal 20 April 2006

Eke, N. & Nkanginieme, K.E. (1999). Female genital mutilation: a global bug that should not cross the millennium bridge. World Journal of Surgery, 23, 1082–1086.

Eldefrawi, M.H., Lofty, G., Dandash, K.F., Refaat, A.H. & Eyada, M. (2001). Female genital mutilation and its psychosexual impact. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 465–473.

IRIN (2005). "Razor's Edge – The Controversy of Female Genital Mutilation". IRIN. Diunduh dari http://www.irinnews.org/IndepthMain.aspx?IndepthId=15&ReportId=62462. Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/female-genital-mutilation#ixzz1DY5dkIYb

Lax, R.F. (2000). Socially sanctioned violence against women: female genital mutilation is its most brutal form. Clinical Social Work Journal, 28, 403–412.

Lightfoot-Klein, H. (1993), Prisoners of Ritual, diterbitkan dengan judul, Das Grausame Ritual, Frankfurt: Fischer Verlag.

Munir, A. A. (2007), Hukum dan hikmah khitan wanita menurut hukum Islam. Diunduh dari http://www.uinsuska.info/syariah/attachments/145_Akmal%20Munir.pdf

Sarkis, M. (2003). Female Genital Cutting (FGC): An Introduction. Retrieved from http://www.fgmnetwork.org/intro/fgmintro.html.

Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Bina Kesehatan Masyarakat Nomor: HK.00.07.1.3.1047a tanggal 20 April 2006 tentang Larangan Medikalisasi Sunat Perempuan bagi Petugas Kesehatan.

Toubia, N., (1994) “Female circumcision as a public health issue” New England Journal of Medicine, 331(13): 712-716.

UNICEF (2005), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A statistical exploration. Diunduh dari http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/FGM-C_final_10_October.pdf

Walker, A. (1991) Possessing the Secret of Joy, London: Vintage.

Walker, A. dan Parmar, P. (1993) Warrior Marks: Female Genital Mutilation and the Sexual Blinding of Women. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Downloads

Published

2010-10-31

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 351  .
PDF downloaded 297  .