The Effect of Environmental Management Accounting on Corporate Sustainability


  • Yobi Nagoya Pratiwi Sriwijaya University
  • Inten Meutia sriwijaya university
  • Syamsurijal Syamsurijal Sriwijaya University



Environmental Management Accounting (EMA), corporate sustainability


This research aimed to examine the effect of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) on corporate sustainability in mining, agriculture, construction and construction materials, energy, textile and apparel companies in Indonesia from 2014-2018. This research had 87 observations from 20 in Indonesia from 2014-2018. EMA was measured by eco-efficiency energy. Meanwhile, corporate sustainability was measured by environmental and social factors. The researchers used content analysis to measure entity sustainability. The data were qualitative and quantitative in the form of annual reports and company sustainability reports based on the G4 of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The results show that there is a positive influence between EMA on corporate sustainability. The high value of the eco-efficiency of the companies indicates the low usage of energy. The low use of energy certainly has a positive impact on environmental and social aspects as well as being a determining factor for corporate sustainability.


Plum Analytics

Author Biographies

Yobi Nagoya Pratiwi, Sriwijaya University

Accounting Department

Inten Meutia, sriwijaya university

Accounting Department

Syamsurijal Syamsurijal, Sriwijaya University

Economic Science Department


Ahmad, J. (2018). Desain penelitian analisis isi (Content analysis). UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Aras, G., Tezcan, N., Kutlu Furtuna, O., & Hacioglu Kazak, E. (2017). Corporate sustainability measurement based on entropy weight and TOPSIS: A Turkish banking case study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(3), 391-413.

Arowoshegbe, A. O., & Emmanuel, U. (2016). Sustainability and Triple Buttom Line: An overview of two interrelated concepts. Igbinedion University Journal of Accounting, 2(August), 88-126.

Demirel, B., & Erdogan, M. (2016). Corporate sustainability reporting in the BIST sustainability index. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 6(10), 21-31.

Caiado, R. G. G., Dias, R. D. F., Mattos, L. V., Quelhas, O. L. G., & Filho, W. L. (2017). Towards sustainable development through the perspective of ecoefficiency-A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165(November), 890-904.

Engida, T. G., Rao, X., Berentsen, P. B., & Lansink, A. G. O. (2018). Measuring corporate sustainability performance–The case of European food and beverage companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195(September), 734-743.

Ertur, C., & Musolesi, A. (2017). Weak and strong crosssectional dependence: A panel data analysis of international technology diffusion. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 32(3), 477-503.

Fuzi, N. M., Habidin, N. F., & Effendy, S. (2016). Environmental management accounting practices and environmental performance for Malaysian manufacturing industry. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(11), 2222-6990.

Global Sustainability Standards Boards. (2016). Gri 205: Anti - korupsi 2016. Retrieved from

Menoni, M., & Morgavi, H. (2014). Is eco-efficiency enough for sustainability? International Journal of Performability Engineering, 10(4), 337-346.

Nikolaou, I. E., & Matrakoukas, S. I. (2016). A framework to measure eco-efficiency performance of firms through EMAS reports. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 8, 32-44.

Pai, J. T., Hu, D., & Liao, W. W. (2018). Research on ecoefficiency of industrial parks in Taiwan. Energy Procedia, 152(October), 691-697.

Republik Indonesia. (1997). Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 1997 Tentang: Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta: Menteri Negara Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia.

Salem, M. A., Hasnan, N., & Osman, N. H. (2011). Can the eco-efficiency represent corporate environmental performance? International Jurnal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(14), 182-187.

Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019). Business cases for sustainability: A stakeholder theory perspective. Organization & Environment, 32(3), 191-212.

Schrippe, P., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2018). Corporate sustainability assessment heuristics: A study of large Brazilian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188(July), 589-600.

Solovida, G. T., & Latan, H. (2017). Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance: mediation role of environmental management accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(5), 595-619.

Székely, N., & Vom Brocke, J. (2017). What can we learn from corporate sustainability reporting? Deriving propositions for research and practice from over 9,500 corporate sustainability reports published between 1999 and 2015 using topic modelling technique. PloS one, 12(4), 1-27.

Tanc, A., & Gokoglan, K. (2015). The impact of environmental accounting on strategic management accounting: A research on manufacturing companies. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 566-573.

Tomšič, N., Bojnec, Š., & Simčič, B. (2015). Corporate sustainability and economic performance in small and medium sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108(December), 603-612.

United Nations Global Compact. (2015). Guide to corporate sustainaibility. Retrieved from

World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2015). Environmental and sustainability management accounting network. Retrieved from

Yook, K. H., Song, H., Patten, D. M., & Kim, I. W. (2017). The disclosure of environmental conservation costs and its relation to eco-efficiency: Evidence from Japan. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(1), 20-42.



Abstract 2755  .
PDF downloaded 1909  .