Understanding People’s Acceptance of Light Rail Transit in Bandung and Its Determinant Factors

Authors

  • Raisha Shadrina School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Yuliani Dwi Lestari School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v10i3.5944

Keywords:

people acceptance, Light Rail Transit (LRT), determinant factors

Abstract

The aim of this research was to verify the readiness of Bandung people in accepting Light Rail Transit (LRT) as the new transport option. Through a survey questionnaire with various respondent backgrounds, the researchers applied statistical analysis using ANOVA to compare the acceptance between the group of gender, age, occupation, income, home location, mobility pattern, and current transport. As the extension, the research also explored the factor determining people’s priority in choosing transport and showing attributes (comfort, security and safety, exclusivity, time travel, cost, flexibility, facility, and accessibility). The result reveals that there are no differences between-group comparisons in accepting LRT as the new transport. In analyzing the determinant factors, the result shows that passengers tend to value security and comfort for their daily activities in choosing public transportation. Meanwhile, the exclusivity and facility are considered undesirable for passengers in deciding to take public transportation for travel. LRT is considered as a mode transport that provides sustainable transportation value. The readiness of passenger and market environment to the sustainable transportation option is important to maintain the successful implementation of the LRT project in Bandung.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

References

Badan Pusat Statistik Bandung. (n.d). Statistik daerah Kota Bandung. Retrieved June 20th, 2019 from https://bandungkota.bps.go.id/

Cartenì, A., De Guglielmo, M. L., & Pascale, N. (2018). Congested urban areas with high interactions between vehicular and pedestrian flows: A costbenefit analysis for a sustainable transport policy in Naples, Italy. The Open Transportation Journal, 12(1), 273-288.

Cheng, Y. H., & Chen, S. Y. (2015). Perceived accessibility, mobility, and connectivity of public transportation systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77(July), 386-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.003

Chowdhury, S., & Ceder, A. A. (2016). Users’ willingness to ride an integrated public-transport service: A literature review. Transport Policy, 48(May), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.03.007

Clark, B., Chatterjee, K., & Melia, S. (2016). Changes to commute mode: The role of life events, spatial context and environmental attitude. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 89(July), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.05.005

Cuthill, N., Cao, M., Liu, Y., Gao, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The association between urban public transport infrastructure and social equity and spatial accessibility within the urban environment: An investigation of Tramlink in London. Sustainability, 11(5), 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051229

De Gruyter, C., Currie, G., & Rose, G. (2017). Sustainability measures of urban public transport in cities: A world review and focus on the Asia/Middle East Region. Sustainability, 9(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010043

De Vos, J., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2014). The influence of attitudes on Transit-Oriented Development: An explorative analysis. Transport Policy, 35(September), 326-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.04.004

Di Pasquale, G., dos Santos, A. S., Leal, A. G., & Tozzi, M. (2016). Innovative public transport in Europe, Asia and Latin America: A survey of recent implementations. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3284-3293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.276

Dinas Perhubungan Pemerintah Kota Bandung. (2016). Bandung urban mobility project. Retrieved from https://ppid.bandung.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/bump-indo-full.pdf

Gunaruwan, T. L., & Jayasekera, D. H. W. (2015). Social inclusivity through public transportation: A strategic approach to improve quality of life in developing countries. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 49(6), 738-751. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1302

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Pearson.

Hamenda, A. (2018). An integrated model of service quality, price fairness, ethical practice and customer perceived values for customer satisfaction of sharing economy platform. International Journal of Business & Society, 19(3), 709-724.

Hasselqvist, H., Hesselgren, M., & Bogdan, C. (2016). Challenging the car norm: Opportunities for ICT to support sustainable transportation practices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1300-1311). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858468

Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable development: Our common future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26(May), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006

Joewono, T. B., & Kubota, H. (2007). User perceptions of private paratransit operation in Indonesia. Journal of Public Transportation, 10(4), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.10.4.5

Korczak, J., & Kijewska, K. (2016). The concept of sustainable development of public passenger transport in Koszalin. Transportation Research Procedia, 16, 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.021

Lee, K. S., Eom, J. K., You, S. Y., Min, J. H., & Yang, K. Y. (2015). An empirical study on the relationship between urban railway ridership and socio-economic characteristics. Procedia Computer Science, 52, 106-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.037

Linnerud, K., & Holden, E. (2016). Five criteria for global sustainable development. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 15(4), 300-314. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2016.081044

Mattioli, G., Lucas, K., & Marsden, G. (2018). Reprint of transport poverty and fuel poverty in the UK: From analogy to comparison. Transport Policy, 65(July), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.019.

Molander, S. (2018). Changing roles and new perspectives: Towards market orientation in public transport. Transportation, 45(6), 1811-1825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9781-3

Nasrudin, N., Rostam, K., & Noor, H. M. (2014). Barriers and motivations for sustainable travel behaviour: Shah Alam residents’ perspectives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 510-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.084

Oliveira, L., Bruen, C., Birrell, S., & Cain, R. (2019). What passengers really want: Assessing the value of rail innovation to improve experiences. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 1(July), 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100014

Oskarbski, J., & Jamroz, K. (2015). Reliability and safety as an objective of intelligent transport systems in urban areas. Journal of KONBiN, 34(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1515/jok-2015-0024

Owczarzak, Ł., & Żak, J. (2015). Design of passenger public transportation solutions based on autonomous vehicles and their multiple criteria comparison with traditional forms of passenger transportation. Transportation Research Procedia, 10, 472-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.001.

Pojani, D., & Stead, D. (2015). Sustainable urban transport in the developing world: Beyond megacities. Sustainability, 7(6), 7784-7805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067784

Sanusi, A., Thayf, H. S., & Alamzah, N. (2017). Customer satisfaction, efficiency, and capital structure as determinants of performance transportation companies in Indonesia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n1p123

Sharma, R., & Newman, P. (2017). Urban rail and sustainable development key lessons from Hong Kong, New York, London and India for emerging cities. Transportation Research Procedia, 26, 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.07.011

Şimşekoğlu, Ö., Nordfjærn, T., & Rundmo, T. (2015). The role of attitudes, transport priorities, and car use habit for travel mode use and intentions to use public transportation in an urban Norwegian public. Transport Policy, 42(August), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.019

Sukarno, I., Matsumoto, H., & Susanti, L. (2016). Transportation energy consumption and emissions-A view from city of Indonesia. Future Cities and Environment, 2(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5334/s40984-016-0019-x

Sundling, C., Nilsson, M. E., Hellqvist, S., Pendrill, L. R., Emardson, R., & Berglund, B. (2016). Travel behaviour change in old age: The role of critical incidents in public transport. European Journal of Ageing, 13(1), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-015-0358-8

Terayama, K., & Odani, M. (2017). Expected role of public transportation services in securing residents’ accessibility to the city center in suburban housing development areas. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4258-4269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.237

Trindade, E. P., Hinnig, M. P. F., Moreira da Costa, E., Marques, J., Bastos, R., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2017). Sustainable development of smart cities: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 3(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0063-2

Wiesenthal, T., Condeço-Melhorado, A., & Leduc, G. (2015). Innovation in the European transport sector: A review. Transport Policy, 42(August), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.003

Downloads

Published

2019-11-30
Abstract 896  .
PDF downloaded 287  .