Effect of Management of Performance Reward Systems on Subordinates’ Satisfaction with Job in Malaysian Fire and Rescue Department
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v8i2.1947Keywords:
management of performance reward systems, job satisfaction, SmartPLSAbstract
This research was to measure the correlation between management of performance reward systems on subordinates’ satisfaction towards the job. A survey method was utilized to collect data from subordinates who worked at the headquarters of fire and rescue departments in Malaysia. The outcomes of SmartPLS path model analysis display two important findings. First, the implementation of information delivery and performance assessment in handling performance reward systems have enhanced subordinates’ intrinsic job satisfaction, but the implementation of
involvement hypothesized performance reward systems has not enhanced subordinates’ intrinsic job satisfaction. Second, implementation of information delivery, involvement and performance assessment in handling performance reward systems have also enhanced subordinates’ extrinsic job satisfaction.
Plum Analytics
References
Aaron, J., Harris, M. L., McDowell, W. C., & Cline, B. N. (2014). Incentive-based compensation for CEOs in small and medium sized enterprises: does pay for performance matter? Journal of Business & Entrepreneurship, 25(1), 1–19.
Ahmad, R., & Scott, N. (2015). Fringe benefits and organisational commitment: the case of Langkawi hotels. Tourism Review, 70(1), 13–23.
Anuar, A., Ismail, A., & Abdin, F. (2014). Administrator’s role in performance pay system as a determinant of job satisfaction. Sains Humanika, 2(2), 11–17.
Artis, M. J., & Zhang, W. (1997). International business cycles and the ERM: Is there a European business cycle? International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2(1), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1158(199701)2:1<1::AID-IJFE31>3.0.CO;2-7
Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2013). Knowledge sharing behaviors of industrial sales people. European Journal of Marketing, 47(8), 1333–1355.
Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies 2.2, 285–309.
Baule, R., & Soost, C. (2016). Pay for performance versus non-financial incentives in small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 8(1).
Bednarska, M. A., & Szczyt, M. (2015). Variations in job satisfaction in service industries: comparative international analysis. Foresight, 17(6).
Chin, W. W. (2001). PLS-Graph user’s guide: Version 3.0. Houstan: TX: Soft Modelling.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (Fourth edi). Carlifornia: SAGE Publication.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Grille, A., Schulte, E.-M., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). Promoting leadership: a multilevel analysis investigating the role of prototypical team leader behavior, psychological empowerment, and fair rewards. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815570039
Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd Ed.). United States of America: SAGE publications Inc.
Henderson, R. I. (2006). Compensation management in a knowledge-based world. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Henseler, J., & Chin, W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(1), 82–109. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903439003
Ismail, A., Anuar, A., Haron, M. S., & Kawangit, R. M. (2015). Reward administration system enhancing organizational commitment: An islamic viewpoint. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 49, 155–167.
Ismail, A., Asilah, K. M. N., & Rahmad, R. M. (2016). Relationship between performance appraisal communication, procedural justice and job satisfaction. Geografia OnlineTM Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(2), 15–26.
Ismail, A., Mohamed, H. A.-B., Sahol Hamid, N., Sulaiman, A. Z., Girardi, A., & Abdullah, M. M. (2011). Relationship between performance based pay, interactional justice and job satisfaction: A mediating model approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(11), 170–181. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n11p170
Ismail, A., & Rivai, H. A. (2007). Relationship between participation in pay systems and job commitment: Does interactional justice act as a mediating variable. Philippine Management Review, 14, 38–58.
Ismail, A., Z., M. F., A., A., M., H. A.-B., & A., R. (2014). Effect of manager’s role in performance based pay on employee outcomes. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 4(2), 41–58.
Ismail, A., & Zakaria, N. (2009). Relationship between Interactional Justice and Pay for Performance as an Antecedent of Job Satisfaction: an Empirical Study in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 190–199.
Jabatan Perdana Menteri. Garis panduan pemberian anugerah perkhidmatan cemerlang anggota perkhidmatan awam (2002). Malaysia.
Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam. Pelaksanaan Sistem Saraan Malaysia Bagi Anggota Perkhidmatan Awam Persekutuan (2002). Malaysia.
Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam. Penambahbaikan Jadual Gaji Minimum - Maksimum Gred 1 Hingga Gred 54 Di Bawah Sistem Saraan Malaysia (2013). Malaysia.
Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam. Rasionalisasi Skim Perkhidmatan Bagi Perkhidmatan Awam Persekutuan Di Bawah (2016).
Khan, Z., Karim, N., & Jan, S. U. (2014). Role of performance based reward system in improving employee ’ s productivity and job satisfaction : Analysis of government and private sector of Peshawar. City University Research Journal, 4(1), 80–87.
Malik, T. (2013). Positive effects of opinion-count on job satisfaction of team members in business enterprises. Journal of Communication Management, 17(1), 56–74. http://doi.org/10.1108/13632541311300151
Markova, G., & Ford, C. (2011). Is money the panacea? Rewards for knowledge workers. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(8), 813–823.
Newman, J. M., Gerhart, B., & Milkovich, G. T. (2016). Compensation (12th ed.). Europe, United States: McGraw Hill Education.
Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. . (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
Osterloh, M. (2014). Viewpoint: why variable pay-for-performance in healthcare can backfire. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 2(1), 120–123.
Pacheco, G., & Webber, D. (2016). Job satisfaction: how crucial is participative decision making? Personnel Review, 45(1).
Salim, S. S., Roszaide, S., Ismail, A., & Yussof, I. (2015). Peranan sistem ganjaran berdasarkan prestasi dalam meningkatkan komitmen organisasi: Kajian kes penjawat awam di Putrajaya dan Selangor, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11(10), 51–62.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2015). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (Sixth Edit). New Delhi.
Shaed, M. M., Ishak, S., & Ramli, Z. (2015). Employees’ Participation in Decision Making (PDM): A literature survey. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11(13), 142–155.
Sharma, N. P., Sharma, T., & Agarwal, M. N. (2016). Measuring employee perception of performance management system effectiveness Conceptualization and scale development. Employee Relations, 38(2), 224–247. http://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2015-0006
Yadav, M., & Rangnekar, S. (2015). Supervisory support and organizational citizenship behavior: Mediating role of participation in decision making and job satisfaction. Evidence-Based HRM:A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 3(3), 258–278.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
