Mapping The Phenomenon Of Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v7i2.1745Keywords:
entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial intention, university studentsAbstract
This research mapped the phenomena that occured in students who are taking classes entrepreneurship that was limited by entrepreneurial knowledge, personal attitude, social norms and self-efficacy. Using descriptive statistics on the answers of 794 respondents, who were students of Bina Nusantara University, produced a variety of results. Based on entrepreneurial knowledge, students still felt hesitant to be able to start and run the entrepreneurial process. On the other hand, self-efficacy and personal attitude reflect a positive thing associated, while the support of family and the environment around where they livevalued invariety. Although this research discovered phenomenon using all the attributes having impacts on entrepreneurship intention, potential students who are properly trained have a probability of playing a leading role in this regard. The benefits that can be expected from this research are useful in identifying suitable students for any entrepreneurial activity in the future with the support of educational institutions, families, and the government as a whole to form the atmosphere of an entrepreneurial culture.Plum Analytics
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychology & health, 26(9), 1113-1127.
Alstete, J. W. (2008). Aspects of entrepreneurial success. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(3), 584-594.
Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of management, 38(1), 9-44.
Baron, R. A. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision making: Differences between experts and novices: Does experience in starting new ventures change the way entrepreneurs think? Perhaps, but for now,“caution” is essential. Journal of Business Venturing 24(4), 310-315.
Basu, A. &. (2008). Assessing entrepreneurial intentions amongst students: A comparative study. 12th Annual Meeting of the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance, (pp. 19-21). Dallas, USA.
Bullough, A. R. (2014). Danger zone entrepreneurs: The importance of resilience and self‐efficacy for entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(3), 473-499.
Caprara, G. V. (2012). Prosociality: the contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(6), 1289.
Carter, S. (2011). The rewards of entrepreneurship: Exploring the incomes, wealth, and economic well‐being of entrepreneurial households. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 39-55.
Chesney, M. A. (2006). A validity and reliability study of the coping self‐efficacy scale. British journal of health psychology, 11(3), 421-437.
Comeche, J. M. (2010). The influence of variables of attitude on collective entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(1), 23-38.
Corbett, A. C. (2007). Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 97-118.
Drucker, P. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.
Duval‐Couetil, N. (2013). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programs: Challenges and approaches. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 394-409.
Fairlie, R. W. (2013). Entrepreneurship, economic conditions, and the great recession. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 22(2), 207-231.
Falk, J. &. (2000). The assessment of entrepreneurship education. Industry and Higher Education, 14(2), 101-108.
Fayolle, A. (2013). Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(7-8), 692-701.
Fayolle, A. G.-C. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology. Journal of European industrial training, 30(9), 701-720.
Garo, E. K. (2015). " Programming" an Entrepreneur. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(1 S1), 45.
Hessels, J. V. (2008). Entrepreneurial aspirations, motivations, and their drivers. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 323-339.
Hisrich, R. L.-F. (2007). Entrepreneurship research and practice: a call to action for psychology. American Psychologist, 62(6), 575.
Hitt, M. A. (2011). Strategic entrepreneurship: creating value for individuals, organizations, and society. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 57-75.
Jansen, S. v. (2015). How education, stimulation, and incubation encourage student entrepreneurship: Observations from MIT, IIIT, and Utrecht University. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(2), 170-181.
Kelley, D. J. (2012). The global entrepreneurship monitor. 2011 Global Report, GEM 2011.
Krueger Jr, N. F. (2007). The Cognitive Infrastructure of Opportunity Emergence*. Entrepreneurship. Springer Berlin Heidelberg., 185-206.
Levenburg, N. M. (2008). Entrepreneurial Orientation among the Youth of India The Impact of Culture, Education and Environment. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 17(1), 15-35.
Linan, F. &. (2009). Development and Cross‐Cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
Linan, F. (2004). Intention-based models of entrepreneurship education. Piccola Impressa/Small Business, 11-35.
Matlay, H. (2008). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 382-396.
McGee, J. E. (2009). Entrepreneurial self‐efficacy: refining the measure. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 33(4), 965-988.
Meek, W. R. (2010). The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: Evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 493-509.
Meyer, M. L. (2014). Origin and emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field. Scientometrics, 98(1), 473-485.
Nordqvist, M. &. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3-4), 211-239.
Oosterbeek, H. V. (2008). The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurship Competencies and Intention: An Evaluation of the Junior Achievement Student Mini-Company Program. Jena Economic Research Papers, 27.
Ostrom, E. (2014). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 6(4), 235-252.
Schwarzer, R. (2014). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Berlin: Taylor & Francis.
Shapero, A. &. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship, 72-90.
Soininen, J. P. (2012). The impact of global economic crisis on SMEs: does entrepreneurial orientation matter? Management Research Review, 35(10), 927-944.
Sundar Rao, P. S., & Richard, J. (2006). Introduction to
Mapping the Phenomenon of Students’......(Yud Buana)
biostatistics and research methods (4th ed.). New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd.
Swan, W. C.-S. (2007). Do people's self-views matter? American Psychologist, 62(2), 84-94.
Van Auken, H. S. (2006). Role model influences on entrepreneurial intentions: A comparison between USA and Mexico. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(3), 325-336.
Zellweger, T. S. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 521-536.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
