The Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism on Managerial Ownership, Risk, and Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v7i3.1637Keywords:
environmental dynamism, managerial ownership, risk, performance, defender companies, prospector companiesAbstract
The goal of this research was to examine the effect of managerial ownership and risk toward company performance with company environment as the moderating variables and the firm-size as the control variable. The hierarchical cluster analysis was used to acquire two group samples of prospector and defender company. The result of multiple regression analysis shows that company environment moderates the risk and the managerial ownership toward the performance. Polynomial regression analysis method was conducted to test the effect of managerial ownership and risk toward the performance in the company with the type of prospector and defender. The result shows that in the prospector company, managerial ownership statistically does not give significant influence to company performance, and in the second degree, managerial ownership does not affect the company performance. This research also proves that managerial ownership negatively affects company performance in the defender company, although this influence gradually changes into the positive influence. This research reveals that risk gives positive influence to company performance in the defender company. Moreover, this influence gradually changes into negative influence. On the other hand, the risk gives negative influence to the performance of prospector company, and it gradually changes into the positive influence.
Plum Analytics
References
Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377–797. http://doi.org/10.2307/2331397
Astuti, A. D., Rahman, A., & Sudarno, S. (2015). Pengaruh
kepemilikan keluarga terhadap kinerja perusahaan dengan agency cost sebagai variabel moderating. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 7(2), 98–108.
Chilin, & Liao, G. M. (2007). Ownership structure, information disclosure and corporate value: An empirical analysis of Taiwan companies. In Proceedings of the 13 Asia Pacific Management
Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 698–704.
Fuad. (2005). Simultanitas dan “trade off” pengambilan
keputusan finansial dalam mengurangi konflik agensi: Peran dari corporate ownership. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 8, 262–276.
Gujarati, D.N., & Porter, D.C. (2012). Basic Econometrics
(5th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hastuti, T. D. (2005). Hubungan antara good corporate
governance dan struktur kepemilikan dengan kinerja keuangan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 8, 238–247.
HT, H. A., & Miftahurrohman. (2014). Pengaruh struktur
kepemilikan saham, kebijakan deviden dan kebijakan hutang terhadap nilai perusahaan (studi pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di BEI). Jurnal Etikonomi, 13(2), 148–163.
Jahmani, Y., & Ansari, M. (2006). Managerial ownership, risk,
and corporate performance. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 16(3&4), 212–221. http://doi.org/10.1108/10569210680000218
Jensen, M. C. (1989). Eclipse of the public corporation.
Harvard Business Review, 67(5), 61–74.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm:
Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economic, 3(4), 305–360. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94043
Juhandi, N., Sudarma, M., & Aisjah, S. (2013). The effects
of internal factors and stock ownership structure on dividend policy on company’s value [A study on manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX)]. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(11), 6–18.
Mehran, H. (1992). Executive incentive plans, corporate
control, and capital structure. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(4), 539–560. http://doi.org/10.2307/2331139
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational strategy,
structure and process. New York: Mc Graw Hills.
Setyawan, M. H. (2006). Pengaruh leverage terhadap
kinerja dengan lingkungan sebagai variabel pemoderasi (Master thesis). Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders
and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488. http://doi.org/10.1086/261385
Short, H., & Keasey, K. (1999). Managerial ownership and
the performance of firms: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(1), 79–101. http://
doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(98)00016-9
Siallagan, H., & Machfoedz, M. (2006). Mekanisme corporate governance, kualitas laba dan nilai perusahaan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 9, 1–23.
Simerly, R. L., & Li, M. (2000). Environmental dynamism,
capital structure, and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 31–49.
Sofyaningsih, S., & Hardiningsih, P. (2011). Struktur
kepemilikan, kebijakan dividen, kebijakan utang dan nilai perusahaan. Dinamika Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 3(1), 68–87.
Soliha, E., & Taswan. (2002). Pengaruh kebijakan hutang
terhadap nilai perusahaan serta beberapa faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 9(2), 143–163.
Syafruddin, M. (2006). Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan
perusahaan pada kinerja : Faktor ketidakpastian lingkungan sebagai pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 10(1), 85–99.
Taswan. (2003). Analisis Pengaruh insider ownership,
kebijakan hutang dan deviden terhadap nilai perusahaan serta faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis,
(2), 162–181.
Veliyath, R., Ferris, S. P., & Ramaswamy, K. (1994). Business
strategy and top management compensation: The mediating effects of employment risk, firm performance, and size. Journal of Business Research, 30(2), 149–159. http://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)90034-5
Williamson, O. E. (1996). Economic organization: The case
for Candor. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 48–57.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
