Tick Size Implementation of Kompas 100 Index at Indonesia Stock Exchange
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v7i3.1498Keywords:
market microstructure, tick size, return, volatility, liquidity, Wilcoxon signed rank testAbstract
Tick Mechanism was included in market microstructure. It studied the process which investors’ latent demands were ultimately translated into prices and volumes. This research reviewed the theoretical, empirical, and experimental literature on market microstructure relating to return, volatility, and liquidity after implementation of new tick size in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The study took a sample of Kompas 100 index because it was represented all level of tick size at IDX. The data were analyzed using differences test with analysis tools e-views. Using Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, there were not significance difference of volatility, return, and liquidity after the implementation of new tick size. The difference of implementation new tick size were contrary results that old tick size has a positive value to return and liquidity while it was negative for volatility. It means that increasing of liquidity and return have the impact to volatility. While the implementation of new tick size has the negative impact to return, liquidity, and volatility.
Plum Analytics
References
Ahn, H. J., Cai, J., Chan, K., & Hamao, Y. (2007). Tick size change and liquidity provision on the Tokyo stock exchange. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 21(2), 173–194.
Ascioglu, A., Commerton-Forde, C., & McInish, T. H. (2010). An examination of minimum tick sizes on the Tokyo stock exchange. Japan and the World Economy, 22(1), 40–48.
Brigham, E. F., & Houston. (2006). Fundamental of financial management (11th ed.). New York: Cengage.
Coughenour, J., & Shastri, K. (1999). Symposium on market microstructure: A review of the empirical evidence. The Financial Review, 34 (4), 1 - 27.
Floros, C. (2009). Modelling volatility using high, low, open, and closing price : Evidence from S&P Indices. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 28, 198 - 206.
Goldstein, M. A., & Kavajecz, K. A. (1998). Eighths, sixteenths, and market depth: Changes in tick size and liquidity provision on the NYSE. Journal of Financial Economics, 56, 125–149.
Harris, L., (1999). Trading and exchanges. Mimeo: University of Southern California.
Keim, D. B., & Madhavan, A. (1998). The costs of institutional equity trades: An overview. Financial Analysts Journal, 54, 50-69.
Ekaputra, I. A., & Asikin, E. S. (2012). Impact of tick size reduction on small caps price efficiency and execution cost on the indonesia stock exchange. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 8(1), 1–12. Retrieved from http://staff.ui.ac.id/system/files/users/irwan.adi/publication/kum_iae_penulis_utama-aamjaf_8-supp-2012_1-12.pdf
Lyons, R. (2000). The microstructure approach to exchange rates. Massachusetts: MIT Press Cambridge.
O’hara, M. (1995). Market microstructure theory. Retrieved from http://www.nhmnc.info/wp-content/uploads/fbpdfs2014/Market-Microstructure-Theory-by-Maureen-OHara-Really-Nice-Book.pdf
Porter, D. C., Powell, G. E., & Weaver, D. G. (1996). Portfolio rebalancing, institutional ownership, and the small firm-January effect. Review of Financial Economics, 5(1), 19–29. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-3300(96)90003-8
Pavabutr, P., & Prangwattananon, S. (2009). Tick size change on the stock exchange of Thailand. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32(4), 351–371.
Purwoto, L., & Tandelilin, E. (2004). The impact of tick size reduction on liquidity. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 6(2), 225–249.
Wu, Y., Krehbiel, T., & Brorsen, B. W. (2011). Impacts of tick size reduction on transaction costs.International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(6), 57–66. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v3n6p57
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
