Tinjauan Rencana Adopsi IAS 41 pada Perusahaan Agrikultur di Bursa Efek Indonesia

Authors

  • Heny Kurniawati Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v4i1.1411

Keywords:

IAS 41, agriculture, fair value, biological assets, agriculture produce

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the adoption plan of IAS 41 Agriculture as a part of IFRS Convergence in Indonesia by investigating the characteristics of biological assets and agriculture produce in public listed companies in Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). The methodology used in this study is qualitative approach by investigating financial statements of agricultural public listed companies for the year 2011. The
study shows that the biological assets recorded in the public listed companies range from consumable biological assets and bearer biological assets. It also shows that many bearer biological assets need more than one reporting period to be ready to produce other biological assets or agriculture produce to be harvest. According to IAS 41, these biological assets should be recorded using fair value model, however this model will not be appropriate. This findings lead to another questions what is the valuation appropriate for biological assets which have different characteristics.

Author Biography

Heny Kurniawati, Bina Nusantara University

Accounting and Finance Department

References

Argiles, J., & Slof, E. (2001). New Opportunities for Farm Accounting. The European Accounting Review , 10 (2), 361-383.

Argiles, J., Bladon, J., & Monllau, T. (2009). Fair Value versus Historic cost valuation for biological assets: Implications for the quality of financial information. Retrieved february 2013, from Social Science Research Network: www.ssrn.com

Ariyanto, Y.H. (2011, April). Social Science Research Network. Retrieved februari 2012, from www.ssrn.com

Ball, R. (2006). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and Cons for Investors. Accounting and Business Research , 5-27.

Barlev, B., & Haddad, J. (2003). Fair value accounting and management of the firm. Critical Perspectives on Accounting , 14 (4), 383-415.

Benston, G. (2008). The shortcomings of fair-value accounting described in SFAS 157. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy , 27 (2), 101-114.

Bhakir, M.I.T. (2010). Applying IAS 41 in Malaysia. Accountant Today , 32-33.

Choi, F., & Meek, G. (2005). International Accounting. 5th edition. Prentice Hall.

Dowling, C., & Godfrey, J. (2001). AASB 1037 sows the seeds of change: A survey of SGARA measurement methods. Australian Accounting Review , 11 (1), 45-51.

Elad, C. (2004). Fair value accounting in the agricultural sector: Some implications for international accounting harmonisation. European Accounting Review , 13 (4), 621-641.

Eland, C., & Herbohn, K. (2011). Implementing Fair Value in the Agricultural Sector. SATER .

Fargher, N. (2001). Management perceptions of fair-value accounting for all financial instruments. Australian Accounting Review , 11 (2), 62-72.

Herbohn, K. (2006). Accounting for SGARA: A stocktake of accounting practice befor compliance with AASB 141 Agriculture. Australian Accounting Review , 16 (2), 62-76.

Herbohn, K. (2005). International Accounting Standards: How adequately are forest assets reported in the balance sheet and income statements. IUFRO World Conference. Brisbane, Australia.

Herbohn, K.; Herbohn, J. (2006). International Accounting Standards (IAS) 41: What are the implications for reporting forest assets. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy , 5 (2), 175-189.

IASB. (2001). Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements. International Accounting Standards Board .

IASC. (2001). International Accounting Standard 41: Agriculture. International Accounting Standards Committee .

Jensen, R.E. (2007). Fair Value Accounting in the USA. In P. Walton, The Routledge Companion to Fair Value and Financial Reporting (p. 21). Routledge.

Johnson, T. L. (2005, February). Relevance and Reliability. The FASB Report .

Lam, N., & Lau, P. (2009). Intermediate Financial Reporting. Singapore: McGraw Hill.

Laux, C., & Leuz, C. (2009). The crisis of fair-value accounting: Making sense of the recent debate. Accounting, Organisations and Society , 34 (6-7), 826-834.

Peavy, D., & Webster, S. (1990). Is GAAP the Gap to International Market? Management Accounting , 72, 31-35.

Penman, S. H. (2007). Financial reporting quality: is fair value a plus or a minus? Accounting and Business Research (Special issue: International Accounting Policy Forum), 33-44.

Perera, M. (1989a). Accounting in Developing Countries: A Case for Localized Uniformity. British Accounting Review , 21 (2), 141-148.

Ryan, S. G. (2008). Fair Value Accounting: Understanding the issue raised by the credit crunch. Council of Institutional Investors. New York.

Saudagaran, S. (2001). International Accounting: A User Perspective. . South Western College Publishing.

Zeghal, D., & Mhedhbi, K. (2006). An analysis of Factors Affecting the Adoption of International Accounting Standards by Developing Countries. International Journal of Accounting , 41 (4), 373-386.

Downloads

Published

2013-05-31
Abstract 406  .
PDF downloaded 763  .