Hubungan antara Kelestarian Ekonomi dan Lingkungan: Suatu Kajian Literatur

Authors

  • Heri Sukendar W Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v4i2.1400

Keywords:

economic growth, environment, pollution, innovation, preservation

Abstract

Pollution of the environment faced is generally caused by economic activity. Traditional economic theory placed trade-off between economic growth and environmental quality. However, since the early 1990s the empirical literature and theoretical literature have been growing rapidly. Research has shown that the relationship between economic growth and the environment can be positive. Research has shown the effect of income on environmental sustainability, control of population density. However, environmental pollution can be controlled to obtain optimal pollution which gives the maximum net benefits of economic activity. Identification of contaminants is required when optimal pollution can be determined. Economic instruments can be used to sue the polluters to control their economic activities. Selection of economic instruments that will be applied will work fine if the value of environmental contamination is known. In fact, pollution is not valuable, and therefore, the economic valuation of pollution is required. Several assessment techniques have been introduced, based on the type of pollution. The results also show that the conventional wisdom focuses more on the pollution control, in which they must be combined with the development of policy options that focus on ecoefficiency aspects of environmental sustainability and innovation in the process of economic development. If not, the economic growth will continue to degrade the environment in most countries.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biography

Heri Sukendar W, Bina Nusantara University

Accounting and Finance Department

References

Ashari. (2003). Tinjauan tentang alih fungsi lahan sawah ke non sawah dan dampaknya di Pulau Jawa.

Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 21(2), 83-98.

Barbier, E. B. (1989). Cash Crops, Food Crops, and Sustainability: The case of Indonesia. World

Development, 17(6), 879-895.

Barbier, E. B. (1995). The Economics of soil rosion: Theory, methodology, and examples. Paper based

on a presentation to the Fifth Biannual Workshop on Economy and Environment in Southeast

Asia. Singapore.

Cannon, J. (1999). Participatory economic valuation of natural resources in the Togean Islands.

Garrod, G., and Willis, K. G. (1999). Economic Valuation of the Environment: Methods and Case

Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Grafton, R.Q., Adamowicz, W., Dupont, D., Nelson, H., Hill, R.J., and Renzetti, S. (2004). The

Economics of the Environment and Natural Resources. Carlton: Blackwell.

Howe, C.W. (1979). Natural Resource Economics: Issues, Analysis, Policy. New York: Willey.

Monke, E. A., and Pearson, S. R. (1989). The Policy Analysis Matrix for Agricultural Development.

Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.

Mourato, S., Ozdemiroglu, E., and Foster, V. (2000). Evaluating health and environmental impacts of

pesticide use: Implications for the design of ecolabels and pesticide taxes. Environmental

Science and.Technology, 34(8), 1456 –1461.

Nas, T. F. (1997). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Theory And Application. London: SAGE.

Ready, R. N. S., Day, B., Dubourg, R., Machado, F., Mourato, S., Spanninks, F., and Maria Xosé

Vázquez Rodriquez, M.X.V. (2004). Benefit transfer in Europe: How reliable are transfers

between countries? Environmental and Resource Economics, 29, 67–82.

Rozan, A. (2004). Benefit transfer: A comparison of WTP for air quality between France and

Germany. Environmental and Resource Economics, 29, 295–306.

Tietenberg, T. (1992). Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. New York: Harper Collins.

Tietenberg, T. (1998). Environmental Economics and Policy. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Turner, K., and Pearce, D. (1991). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. The Johns

Hopkins University Press.

Downloads

Published

2013-11-29
Abstract 1922  .
PDF downloaded 4534  .