Analysis on The Society Indicator of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of PT Antam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v4i2.1383Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), financial statement,Abstract
Stakeholders believe that CSR report of a company provides significant information as well as the financial information reported in financial statement. The purpose of this research is to analyze the comprehensiveness and information on society indicator stated in the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting. The Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (version 3.1) provides indicators to analyze the CSR of company. This research focuses on society aspect as one of the performance indicators. Comprehensive reporting contains three types of information: (i) vision and goals, (ii) management approach, and (iii) performance indicator. The methodology used in this research was data collection. This research analyzed the disclosure of society aspect by PT Antam on their financial statement and annual CSR report for the year 2012. The result of this research explains that PT Antam’s sustainability report for the year 2012 was comprehensive because they reported all the six aspects of society indicator. However, PT Antam failed to report the total value of financial and in kind contributions to political parties, politicians, and related institutions by country (SO6) as part of public policy aspect in their sustainability report.
Plum Analytics
References
Adams, C. A., Hill, W. Y., and Roberts, C. B. (1995). Environmental, Employee and Ethical
Reporting in Europe. London: ACCA Research Report, No. 41.
Beattie, V., and Thomson, S. J. (2007). Lifting the lid on the use of content analysis to investigate
intellectual capital disclosures. Accounting Forum, 31(2), 129–163.
Beck, A. C., Campbell, D., and Shrives, P. J. (2010). Content analysis in environmental reporting
research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British-German context. British
Accounting Review, 42(3), 207–222.
Farneti, F., and Guthrie, J. (2009). Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations:
Why they report. Accounting Forum, 33(2), 89–98.
Guthrie, J., & Abeysekera, I. (2006). Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: What is
new? Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 10(2), 114–126.
Guthrie, J., Cuganesan, S., & Ward, L. (2008). Industry specific social and environmental reporting:
The Australian food and beverage industry. Accounting Forum, 32(1), 1–15.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks,
California: Sage Publications.
Lamberton, G. (2005). Sustainability accounting—A brief history and conceptual framework.
Accounting Forum, 29(1), 7–26.
Milne, M. J., and Adler, R. W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental
disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256.
Neu, D., Warsame, H., and Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental
disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282.
O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and
sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. British Accounting Review, 37(2), 205–229.
PT Antam. (2012). Laporan Keberlanjutan Perusahaan Persero PT Aneka Tambang.
Reynolds, M. A., and Yuthas, K. (2008). Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting.
Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 47–64.
Vuontisjärvi, T. (2006). Corporate social reporting in the European context and human resource
disclosures: An analysis of Finnish companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(4), 331–354.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative
Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 49. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Willis, A. (2003). The role of the Global Reporting Initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines in
the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 233–237.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
