Hubungan Teknologi Informasi dan Formulasi Strategi Kompetitif Serta Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja Organisasional: Kerangka Konseptual

Authors

  • Agustinus Dedy Handrimurtjahjo Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v5i1.1207

Keywords:

information technology, competitive strategic, organizational performance

Abstract

The relationship between IT and firm performance is a crucial research issue that symbolizes the value of information systems research. Many studies have attempted to understand the role of IT in organizational performance, and more researchers are paying attention to the notion of IT capabilities, including their potential to transform IT resources into business value. Meanwhile, the other study identified and investigated the three building blocks of IT deployment capabilities: strategic IT flexibility, business–IT partnership, and business–IT alignment. Using the resource-based view, the study propose a framework to explain the relationship between IT deployment capabilities and competitive advantage. This paper aims to find relationship between IT and Competitive Strategies and their impact on Organizational Performance.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biography

Agustinus Dedy Handrimurtjahjo, Bina Nusantara University

Jurusan Manajemen

References

Barney J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management. 17, 99–

Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, M. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management

Journal, 21(10), 1105–1121

Huang, Derrick, C., Hu, Qing. (2007). Achieving IT-Business Strategic Alignment via Enterprise-

Wide Implementation of Balanced Scorecards. Information Systems Management; Spring

, 24:173

Kim, Gimun, Shin, Bongsik, Kim, Kyung Kyu; Lee, Ho Geun. (2010). IT Capabilities, Process-

Oriented Dynamic Capabilities, and Firm Financial Performance. Journal of the Association

for Information Sytem, 12(7), 487-517.

Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York:

McGraw-Hill.

Pelham, A. M. (1999). Influence of Environment, strategy, and market orientation on performance in

small manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Research, 45, 33-46.

Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press Inc., New York.

Fourth edition.

Porter, M. E. (1981). The contribution of Industrial Organization ro Strategic Management. Academy

of Management Review ; Vol. 6, No. 4, 609-620.

______. (1980). Competitive Strategy. Free Press: NewYork.

______. (1991). Towards A Dynamic Theory Of Strategy. Strategic Management Journal; 12, 95.

Rivard, S., Raymond, L., Verreault, D. (2006). Resource-based View & Competitive Strategy: An

Integrated Model of the Contribution of Information Technology to Firm Performance. Journal

of Strategic Management Systems. 15, 29-50.

Teece D J, Piano G, Shuen A (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic

Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533

______. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Oxford University Press. First

edition.

Tian, J., Wang, K., Chen, Y., Johansson, B. (2009). From IT Deployment Capabilities to Competitive

Advantage: An Exploratory Study in China. Information System Front.

Downloads

Published

2014-05-30
Abstract 385  .
PDF downloaded 340  .