Pengaruh Strategi Inovasi terhadap Kinerja Operasional Perusahaan Manufaktur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v1i2.1095Keywords:
Innovation strategy, operational performance, manufacturingAbstract
This research examines the effect of innovation strategy towards operational performance of manufacturing companies in Sulawesi. Dimensions of innovation strategy are leadership orientation, process innovation, product innovation, and implementation of innovation. Operational performance is measured by using productivity, volume of production defect, warranty claims cost, quality cost, and full on time delivery to consumers. Data collecting was conducted through questionnares, which consisted of 63 respondents. Data is processed with multiple regressions. Results of this research indicate direct significant effect among the dimensions of innovation strategy to the operational performance of manufacturing companies. But not all of them have an effect on operational performance of the manufacturing company. Process innovation, product innovation, and implementation of innovation give significant effect to the operational performance. Leadership orientation does not give significant effect to the operational performance of the manufacturing companies in Sulawesi.
Plum Analytics
References
Anonym. (1985). Competitive advantage-creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press, 145-156.
Anonym. (1990). Competitive advantage-creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press, 145-156.
Anonym. (1990). A dynamic perspective on the impact of process innovation upon competitive strategies. Strategie Management Journal, 11, 25-41.
Anonym. (1993). Operation management: Decision making in the operation function, 4th ed., McGraw Hill Inc.
Avionitis, G.J dan N.Tzokas. 1994. Assessing the Innovativeness of Organizations and its antecedents: Project Innovative. European Journal of Marketing, 28, (11), pp.5-28.
Baldwin, J. R. 1995. Innovation: The Key To Success In Small Firm, Working Paper Series, Micro- Economic Studies and Analysis Devision, Statistics Canada and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Economic. Project Growth, No. 76.
Barton, L.D. (1991). The role of process innovation and adaptation in attaining strategic technological management, 6(3), 303-320.
Biro Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2003.Statistik Industri Perusahaan Manufaktur Skala Menengah dan Besar, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Bustamante, P. (1999). Knowledge management in agile innovation organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 6-17.
Cooper, J.R. 1998. A Multidimensional Approach to The Adoption of Innovation. Management Decision, 36, 8: 493-502.
Cottam, A.J. Ensor, and C. Band. 2001. A Benchmark Study of Strategic Commitment to Innovation, European Journal of Innovation Management, 4 (2), pp. 88-94.
Cumming, B.S. (1998). Innovation overview and cuture challenges. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 21-29.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
Ettlie, J.E., and Reza, E.M. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 795-827.
Frambach, R.T., and Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multilevel framwork o determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 163-176.
Ghozali, I. (2005). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS, edisi ketiga, Universitas Diponegoro Press, 56-69.
Gibson, L.J., Ivancevich, M. J., and Donelly, H.J.Jr. (1995). Organizations, 8th ed., Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Johne, A. (1999). Successful market innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2(1), 6-11.
Kaplan, R.S., and Norton, D.P. (1992). The balance scorecard measure that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 3, 71-79.
Kemp, R.G.M, Folkeringa, M., De Jong, J.P.J., and Wubben, E.F.M. (2003). Innovation and firm performance: Differences between small and medium-sized firms. Scientific Analysis of Enterpreneurship and SMEs.
Khan, A.M., and Manopicketwattana, V. (1989). Innovative and noninnovative small firm: types and characteristic. Management Science, 4, 597-606.
Klein, K.J., and Sorra, J.S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 1055-1077.
Krubasik, E.G. (1988). Customize your product development. Harvard Business Review, 66(6), 46-52.
Leong, G.K., Synder, D.L., and Waed, P.T. (1990). Reseach in the process and conted of manufacturing strategy. Omega, 28, 109-122.
Lukas, B.A., and Ferrel, O.C. (2000). The effect of market orientation product innovation. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 239-247.
Mavondo, F., and Farrel, M. (2003). Cultural orientation: Its relationship with market orientation, innovation, and organizations performance. Management Decision, 41(3), 241-249.
Melum, M. (2002). Developing high performance leaders. Quality Management in Health Care, 11, 55-68.
Mintzberg, H., and Quinn, J.B. (1991). The strategy process, contexts, and class, Practice Hall International Inc.
Morse, S. (1998). Successful product management. Marketing in Action Series, edisi Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Noori, H., and Radford, R. (1995). Production and operation management: Total quality and responsiveness, USA: Mc Graw-Hill, Ine.
Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy - technique for analyzing industries and competitive. The Free Press, 145-156.
Read, A. (2000). Determinant of sucessful organizational innovation: A review of current research. Journal of Management Practice, 3(1), 95-119.
Schroeder, R.G., Anderson, J.C., and Cleveland, G. (1986). The content of manufacturing strategy. Journal of Operation Management, 6(4), 367-389
Sharma, B., and Fisher, T. (1997). Functional strategies and competitiveness: An empirical analysis using data from Australian manufacturing. Bencmarking for Quality Management and Technology, 4, 286-294.
Sharma, U. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of enviromental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 681-697.
Terziovski, M., Samson D., and Douglas, Dow. (1997). The business value of quality management system certification evidence from Australia and New Zeland. Journal Operation Management, 15, 1-18.
Terziovski, M., and Samson, D. (1999). The link between total quality management, 16(3), 1-18.
Utterback, J.M. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the faced of technological change Boston. Harvard Business School Press.
Zahra, S.A., and Das, S.R. (1993). Innovation strategy and inancial performance in manufacturing companies: An empirical study. Production and Operation Management, 2(1), 15-37.
Zhou, S., and Stan, S. (1998). The determinants of export performance: A review of the empirical literature between 1987-1997. International Marketing Review, 15(5), 333-356.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
