Pemilihan Universitas Favorit dengan Pendekatan Rantai Markov

Authors

  • Tinjung Desy Nursanti Universitas Bina Nusantara
  • Laksmi Sito Dwi Irianti Universitas Bina Nusantara
  • Haryadi Sarjono Universitas Bina Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v1i2.1082

Keywords:

Markov Chain, favorite, SMA, Bogor, university

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of transfer of interest at class XII students in a private high school in Bogor to five universities in the Greater Jakarta namely UI, UBinus, Untar, IPB and UPH in the next period and the conditions of equilibrium, and to discover the source of reference selection and assessment of students on the fifth university. Sample consists of 411 class XII students in a private high school in Bogor, with the method and type of survey research is descriptive research. The result is a prediction of the five university in order in the next period of (0.22, 0.31, 0.14, 0.22, 0.11) when the equilibrium prediction of (0.15, 0.562, 0.076, 0.151, 0.09) and the selection of a reference source that is 29% of promotional events, 25 % of the ads, 24% of the families, and 22% from friends. Largest market share held by UBinus enthusiasts of 56.2%, while the smallest market share owned by Untar enthusiasts that is equal to 7.6%. 

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biographies

Tinjung Desy Nursanti, Universitas Bina Nusantara

Jurusan Manajemen 

Laksmi Sito Dwi Irianti, Universitas Bina Nusantara

Jurusan Manajemen

Haryadi Sarjono, Universitas Bina Nusantara

Jurusan Manajemen

References

Cannon, J.P., et al. (2008). Pemasaran dasar (basic marketing), Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Djan, I., dan Ruvendi, R. (2006). Prediksi perpindahan penggunaan merek handphone di kalangan mahasiswa (studi kasus pada mahasiswa STIE Binaniaga), Jurnal Ilmiah Binaniaga, 02(1).

Indriantoro, N., dan Supomo, B. (2002). Metodologi penelitian untuk akuntansi dan manajemen, edisi pertama, Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Kotler, P, et al. (2003). Marketing management an Asian perspective, 3rd ed., Singapore: Prentice Hall.

Nugroho, B.A. (2005). Strategi jitu memilih metode statistik penelitian dengan SPSS, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Render, B, et al. (2003). Quantitative analysis for management, 8th ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc.

Render, B, et al. (2006). Quantitative analysis for management, 9th ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc.

Santoso, S. (2005). Seri solusi bisnis berbasis ti menggunakan SPSS untuk statistik parametrik, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Siagian, P. (1987). Penelitian operasional (teori dan praktek), Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Siswanto. (2007). Operations research, jilid kedua, Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sudirga, R.S. (2006). Pengaruh biaya promosi, jumlah SPG, dan pelaksanaan promosi yang melibatkan SPG terhadap penjualan dan strategi pemasaran bumbu IF, Telaah Manajemen, 1(2).

Taylor, B.W. (2001). Sains manajemen, buku kedua, Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Umar, H. (2003). Riset pemasaran dan perilaku konsumen, Jakarta: Gramedia

Downloads

Published

2010-11-30
Abstract 573  .
PDF downloaded 830  .