Analysis of Advantages and Disadvantages of Current Operational Risk Management Models (AS/NZS 4360, AS/NZS ISO 9000, AS/NZS ISO 14000, AS/NZS 4801, AS/NZS 3806, AS/NZS 4444)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v3i2.3852Keywords:
operational risk management, advantages, disadvantagesAbstract
This paper will describe about the analysis of advantages and disadvantages of current operational risk management models (AS/NZS 4360: Risk Management, AS/NZS 4801: Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems, AS/NZS ISO 9001: Quality Management System, AS/NZS ISO 14001: Environment Management System, AS/NZS 3806: Compliance Management System, AS/NZS 4444: Information Security Management) based on expert experiences and extracting the literature review. The advantages of most current models are widely adopted by industries of various of sizes as the basis for their operational risk management. In addition, they may help the organizations to improve the operations and competitiveness. However, there are some disadvantages of most current models such as the models are very general (guidance only), not specific to cover particular risks of industries. And they don’t have the specific tools and processes. In addition, they may not be able to integrate all elements of the management systems such as safety, health, environment, quality, security, and compliance.
Plum Analytics
References
Acotrel Risk Management Pty Ltd. Management System. 2000.
Anonymous. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Project Management Institute. ed. P. Chapter 11. 2000. USA: Standards Committee.
Bachelor, C. 1993. A Victim of Its Own Success. Financial Times. p. 13.
Beattle, K.R. and A.S. Sohal. 1999. “Implementing ISO 9000: A Study of Its Benefits Among Australian Organizations.” Total Quality Management. 10(1): p. 12.
Bodinson, G.W. 1991. Warning: Ignoring ISO Standards May be Harmful to Your Company's Fitire". Industrial Management. 33 (2): p. 1.
Brown, A. and A. Van Der Wiele. 1995. “Industry Experience with ISO 9000.” Asia Pacific Journal of Quality Management. 4: p. 9.
Brown, A., T. Wiel, and K. Loughton. 1998. Smaller Enterprises' Experiences with ISO 9000. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management. 15 (3).
Broadleaf Capital International Pty Ltd. 2001. “Risk Management Beyond 2001.” NAVSAFE 01, Managing Safety and Risk into the Future. Sydney: Broadleaf Capital International PTY LTD.
Bullish Technologies. 2002. Information on AS/NZS 4360. 2002: p. 6 October.
Bullish Technologies. 2003. Environment Management.
Burr, J.T. “The Future Necessity.” 1990. Quality Progress. p. 4.
Chapman, C.B. and S. Ward. Project Risk Management: Processes, Techniques, and Insights. 1997. Chichester, New York: Wiley.
Curry, A. and C. Monaghan, Service Quality in Local Authorities: BS 5750/ISO 9000: Friend or Foe. Local Government Policy Making, 1994. 21: p. 7
Dale, B.G. and J.S. Oakland. Quality Improvement Through Standards. 1991. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
Dorn, J. and R. Peratello. “Model Based Quality Management.” Database and Artificial Inteligent Group. Institute for Information System. Technical University Vienna.
Erel, E. and J.B. Ghosh. ISO 9000 Implementation in Turkish Industry. International Journal Operations and Production Management, 1997. 17(2): p. 13.
ERMA New Zealand. 2002. Risk Management Standard and Handbooks. “http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/RiskManagement/standard-handbooks.htm”
Grey, D.S. 2001. “Comparison of Three Approaches to Project Risk Management.” Risk Management Process. Broadleaf Capital International Pty Ltd: Melbourne.
Harrison, J. Is ISO 9000 the Road to Quality?
Hillary, R. 2001. “ISO 14001 Case Studies: Beyond Rhetoric to Reality.” ISO Management System. International Journal of Corporate Sustainability: Golborne-London.
George, S. ISO 14000: Solution to International Environmental Crisis or Corporate Window Dressing? an Analysis of ISO 14000 and its Impact on Business and the Environment.
Homan, H. Environmental Management System (EMS) - a Solution of Control Pollution. Bureau Veritas Brunei.
International Organization for Standarization. ISO Survey of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 Certificates. 1999. ISO.
Kanji, G.K. An Innovative Approach to Make ISO 9000 Standards More Effective. Total Quality Management, 1998. 9: p. 11.
Kehoe, D.F. The Fundamentals of Quality Management. 1996. London: Chapman and Hall.
Lam J. and B. Kawamoto. 1997. Emergence of The Chief Risk Officer. Risk Management.
Larsen, B. and T. Haversjo. 2000. “The year 2000 problem of ISO 9000: Will the Quality Standards Survive the Proposed Year 2000 Revision.” TQM Magazine. 12(4): p. 226-237.
Lee, T.Y., The Development of ISO 9000 Certification and the Future of Quality Management: A Survey of certified firms in Hong Kong. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 1998. 15(2): p. 55.
Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance Ltd (LRQA), ISO 9000 - Setting Standards for Better Business. LRQA. 1991. Colchester: Lloyds of London Press.
Marquardt, D.W., ISO 9000: A Universal Standard of Quality. Management Review. 1992. 81(1): p. 2.
McNamee, D. Risk Management Today and Tomorrow. Mc2 Management Consulting.
McTeer, M.M. and B.G. Dale. 1996. “The Attitudes of Small Companies to the ISO 9000 Series.” Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 210(B5): p. 6.
Najmi, M. and D. F. Kehoe. An Integrated Framework for Post ISO 9000 Quality Development. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 2000. 17(3): p. 32.
Pearch, et al. 2000. ISO 9000:2000 The New International Standard for Quality. Power Engineering, 104(8).
Quazi, H.A. and S.R. Padibjo, A Journey Towards TQM Through ISO 9000 Certification- A study on Small and Medium Ssized Enterprises in Singapore. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 1998. 15(5): p. 18.
Rayner, P. and L.J. Porter. BS 5759/ISO 9000 The Experience of small and medium sized firms.
International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 1991. 8(6): p. 12.
Risk Management, A.S.A.P. “Risk Management Standard, What Sort of Information is in This Standard?”2000.“http://www.riskmanagement.com.au/RISKMAN/INFO/RMSTANDARD/RMSTANDARD.” HTM
Rondinelli, D.a.G.V. 2000. “Panacea, Common Sense of Just a Label? The Value of ISO 14001 Environmental Management System.” European Management Journal. 18(5): p. 499-510.
Singleton, W.T. and J. Hovden. 1987. Risk and Decisions. Great Britain: John Wiley and Sons.
Standards Australia International and Standards New Zealand. Risk Management. AS/NZS 4360:1999
.Strategy Unit, U. 2002. Risk: Improving Government’s Capability to Handle Risk and Uncertainty. Cabinet Office.
S.A. International and Standards New Zealand. Environmental Management Systems-Specification with guidance for use. AS/NZS ISO 14001:1996.
SAI Global Assurance Services. 2001. Manage Your Risks, Assets and Reputation-Occupational Health and Safety Management.
Standards Australia International and Standards New Zealand. Occupational Health and Safety Management Ssystems-Specification with Guidance for Use. AS/NZS 4801:2001.
Standards Australia International. and Standards New Zealand. Quality Management Systems-Requirements. AS/NZS ISO 9001:2000.
Standards Australia International. and Standards New Zealand. 1998. Compliance Programs. AS/NZS 3806.
Standards Australia International. and Standards New Zealand. Information Security Management. AS/NZS 4444:1999.
Struebing, L. “9000 Standards.” 1996. Quality Progress. 29: p. 15.
The International Occupational Hygiene Association. 1998. Review and Analysis of International, National, and Regional Systems and Proposals for a New International Document-Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems.
Vega Consulting GmbH. 2002. Business Excellence in the Airline Industry.
Wheeler, S. 2000. Does ISO 14001 Provide an Effective EMS that Reduces an Organization's Environmental Impacts? A Critical Investigation Incorporating an Intial Environmental Review and Proposed Revisions for the ISO 14001 Sstandard.
WWF. 1995. Forests for Life. WWF's 1995 Seminar Proceedings.
Wideman, R.M. 1992. Project and Program Risk Management: A Guide to Managing Project Risk and Opportunities. USA: Project Management Institute PMI.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
