Mediating Civil Conflicts in Southeast Asia: Lessons from Aceh and Mindanao




Mediation, civil conflicts, third-parties, Southeast Asia, Aceh, Mindanao


Southeast Asia has been a hotbed of intractable civil conflicts motivated by several issues such as ethnicity, ideology, and historical injustice, among others. Despite the intractability, there have been instances when third-party assistance through mediation has been vital in achieving peace agreements in the region. Using the cases of the third-party mediation of the conflicts in Aceh, Indonesia and Mindanao, Philippines, this research identified the kinds of mediation and qualities of mediators that led to the achievement of peace agreements in these two cases. This research mainly focused on path dependence, critical junctures, and periodization approaches in the comparative analysis of Aceh and Mindanao third-party mediation through a qualitative examination that involved comparative process tracing (CPT), a two-step methodological approach that combines theory, chronology, and comparison. The results showed that the mediators instrumental to the Aceh and Mindanao peace agreements allayed the commitment issues of the negotiations and ensured the trust and confidence of the conflict parties. Thus, mediators should create relations of trust among parties and a mediation environment where the commitment fears are relieved through the promise of third-party monitoring.

Author Biography

John Lee Candelaria, Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University

John Lee Candelaria is a Ph.D. student at the Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, Japan. He graduated with a master’s degree in history from the University of the Philippines. His research interests include Southeast Asian studies, peace and conflict studies, international studies, and regional organizations.


Abinales, P. J. and Amoroso, D. J. (2017). State and Society in the Philippines (2nd Ed). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

Beardsley, K. (2008). Agreement without peace? International mediation and time inconsistency problems. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 723–740.

Bengtsson, B. and Ruonavaara, H. (2017). Comparative process tracing: Making historical comparison structured and focused. Philosophy of Social Sciences, 47(1), 44-66.

Bercovitch, J. (2008). Mediation and conflict resolution. In J. Bercovitch, V. Kremenyuk, & I. W. Zartman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of conflict resolution (pp. 340–357). London: SAGE.

Braithwaite, J., Braithwaite, V., Cookson, M. and Dunn, L. (2010). Anomie and Violence: Non-truth and Reconciliation in Indonesian Peacebuilding. Canberra: Australian National University Press, The Australian National University.

Buendia, R. G. (2005). The secessionist movement and the peace process in the Philippines and Indonesia: The case of Mindanao and Aceh. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 5(1), 50-66.

Carnevale, P. J., and Arad, S. (1996). Bias and impartiality in international mediation. In J. Bercovitch (Ed.), Resolving International Conflicts: The Theory and Practice of Mediation (pp. 39–54). London: Lynne Rienner.

Che Man, W. K. (1990). Muslim separatism: The Moros of Southern Philippines and the Malays of Southern Thailand. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Derouen, K. and Bercovitch, J. (2019). The Civil War Mediation Data Set. Bercovitch Data Centre for Conflict, Mediation, and Peacebuilding. University of Canterbury.

Elgström, O., Bercovitch, J. and Skau, C. (2003). Regional organisations and international mediation: The effectiveness of insider mediators. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 3(1), 11–27.

Fitrah, D. I. (2012). Multiparty Mediation in the Southern Philippines Conflict (Advanced master thesis, Leiden University, Netherlands).

Haass, R. N. (1990). Conflicts Unending: The US and Regional Disputes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Harish, S. P. (2005). Towards Better Peace Process: A Comparative Study of Attempts to Broker Peace with MNLF and GAM. (Working Paper, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Singapore).

Heiling, R. M. (2008). Conflict resolution in Aceh in light of track one and a half diplomacy. ASEAS – Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 1(2), 171–186.

Higgins, N. and Daly, B. (2010). Resolving armed conflict: The Acehnese experience of mediation. US-China Law Review, 7(3), 1–14. https:/

Huber, K. (2004). The HDC in Aceh: Promises and pitfalls of NGO mediation and implementation. Policy Studies 9. Washington, D. C.: East-West Center Washington.

Huber, K. (2008). Aceh’s arduous journey to peace. In Aguswandi & J. Large (Eds.), Accord: An international review of peace initiatives (pp. 16–21). London: Conciliation Resources.

Iqbal, M. (2018, 18 July). PEACETALK: Malaysia and its role in the GPH-MILF peace process. MindaNews.

Karim, F. N. (2012, 21 October). SUNDAY INTERVIEW: Quiet envoy helps seal peace deal. New Straits Times.

Kingsbury, D. (2006). Peace in Aceh: A Personal Account of the Helsinki Peace Process. Jakarta: Equinox.

Kivimäki, T. and Gorman, D. (2008). Non-government Actors in Peace processes: The Case of Aceh. Geneva: Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.

Kleiboer, M. (1996). Understanding success and failure of international mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40(2), 360–389.

Lederach, J. P. (1991). Of nets, nails, and problems: The folk language of conflict resolution in a Central American Setting. In K. Avruch, P. Black, & J. A. Scimecca (Eds.), Conflict resolution: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 165–186). New York, Westport, Connecticut, London: Greenwood Press.

Lingga, A. S. M. (2006). Role of Third Parties in Mindanao Peace Process. (Discussion paper, Institute of Bangsamoro, Philippines).

Marohomsalic, N. A. (2001). Aristocrats of the Malay race: A history of the Bangsa Moro in the Philippines. Quezon City: Author.

Merikallio, K. (2006). Making peace: Ahtisaari and Aceh (D. Mitchel, Trans.). Helsinki: W. Söderström.

Miller, M. A. (2008). The conflict in Aceh. In Aguswandi & J. Large (Eds.), Accord: An international review of peace initiatives (Issue 20, pp. 12–15). London: Conciliation Resources.

Möller, F, Derouen K. Jr., Bercovitch, J. and Wallesteen, P. (2007). The limits of peace: Third parties in civil wars in Southeast Asia 1993¬¬-2004. Negotiation Journal, 23(4), 373–391.

na Thalang, C. (2017). Malaysia’s role in two South-East Asian insurgencies: ‘An honest broker’? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(4), 389–404.

Noble, L. G. (1981). Muslim separatism in the Philippines, 1972-1981: The making of a stalemate. Asian Survey, 21(11), 1097–1114.

Odaira, T. (2009). The effectiveness of third-party mediation in internal armed conflicts: Cases of Mindanao and Aceh. The Journal of Social Science, 68, 31–52.

Sangsuwan, S. (2014). Ethnic conflict and peace process: A comparative study in Aceh and Mindanao. Political Science and Public Administration Journal, 5(1), 54–65.

Santos, S. M. J. (2013, 15 April). The role of Islamic diplomacy in the Mindanao peace process. Asia Peacebuilding Initiatives.

Shea, N. (2016). Nongovernment organisations as mediators: Making peace in Aceh, Indonesia. Global Change, Peace and Security, 28(2), 177–196.

Smith, A. and Stam, A. (2003). Mediation and peacekeeping in a random walk model of civil and interstate war. International Studies Review, 5(4), 115–135.

Sukma, R. (2004). Security operations in Aceh: Goods, consequences, and lessons. Policy Studies 3. Washington, DC: East-West Center Washington.

Sustikarini, A. (2019). Financing peace: Special Autonomy Fund as a peace dividend in Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 7(2), 99–121.

Taya, S., Omar, R., Yaacob, C. M. A. and Lantong, A. (2018). Peacebuilding model of third-party mediation in the Philippines: Comparing Malaysia and the OIC. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, (SPI6), 1151–1157.

Touval, S. and Zartman, I. W. (1985). Introduction: Mediation in theory. In S. Touval & I. W. Zartman (Eds.), International mediation and practice (pp. 7–17). Boulder, CO: Westview.

Walter, B. F. (2002). Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wehr, P. and Lederach, J. P. (1991). Mediating conflict in Central America. Journal of Peace Research, 28(1), 85–98.

Williams, T. (2010). The MoA-AD debacle – An analysis of individuals’ voices, provincial propaganda and national disinterest. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(1), 121–144.

Young, O. R. (1967). Intermediaries: Third parties in international crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.