Shifting Alignments in India’s Southeast Asia Policies

Authors

  • Intan Zurina Dollah Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Mohd Kamarulnizam Abdullah Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v14i1.14219

Keywords:

India, ASEAN, regionalism, neo-classical realism, act east policy

Abstract

Drawing on historical and contemporary sources, this research argued that India’s policies toward Southeast Asia have been shaped by the interplay of three primary drivers: security maximization, economic maximization, and power maximization. The dominance of one driver or a combination of drivers varies across temporal phases, producing shifting alignments in India’s policy orientation and its regional engagement with Southeast Asia. This research applied neo-classical realism to examine the evolution of India’s foreign policy towards Southeast Asia from the Cold War through the post-Cold War period. This research used qualitative methods and process tracing to trace historical progression and debates that show a non-linear pattern in India’s policy path towards Southeast Asia. While India’s policy during the Cold War period demonstrated an interplay among the three drivers, this shifted in the later Cold War period, when security maximization became more prominent. After the Cold War, economic maximization became more dominant as India sought deeper institutional and economic engagement with Southeast Asia, reflected in the Look East Policy. The Act East Policy, which was subsequently launched under India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, further broadened this engagement to encompass stronger security and power considerations. The research further finds that India’s shifting alignments are influenced not only by structural international pressures but also by domestic political considerations, including elite legitimation shaped by material and ideational factors.

Dimensions

References

Abraham, I. (2008). From Bandung to NAM: Non-alignment and Indian foreign policy, 1947-65. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 46(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14662040801990280

Acharya, A. (2011). Asian regional institutions and the possibilities for socializing the behavior of states (ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration No. 82). Asian Development Bank

Acharya, A. (2016). Studying the Bandung conference from a Global IR perspective. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(4), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718. 2016.1168359

Ahmed, A. (2012, July 9). India-ASEAN relations in 21st century: Strategic implications for India - analysis. Eurosia Review. https://www.eurasiareview.com/09072012-india-asean-relations-in-21st-century-strategic-implications-for-india-analysis/

Anand, M. (2009). India-ASEAN relations: Analysing regional implications. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies Special Report. https://www.ipcs.org/issue_briefs/issue_brief_pdf/ SR72-Final.pdf.

Appadorai, A. (1955). The Bandung Conference. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 11(3), 207-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/097492845501100301

ASEAN Secretariat. (2015). Building the ASEAN Community: ASEAN-India Free Trade Area (AIFTA). ASEAN Secretariat.

Ayoob, M. (1990). India and Southeast Asia (Routledge revivals): Indian perceptions and policies. Routledge.

Bajpaee, C. (2017). Dephasing India’s look east/act east policy. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 39(2), 348–72.

Bajpaee, C. (2022). Reinvigorating India’s ‘Act East’ policy in an age of renewed power politics. The Pacific Review, 36(3), 631–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09512748.2022.2110609.

Beach, D. (2023). Process tracing methods and international studies. In N. Roy (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/ 9780190846626.013.724

Bhasin, A.S. (2012). ASEAN India progress & prosperity documents. Geetika Publisher.

Bhuyan, A. (2014, January 10). How Hanuman became Houliman.Business Standard. https://www.business-standard.com/article/beyond-business/how-hanuman-became-houliman-114010900650_1.html.

Brewster, D. (2013). India’s defense strategy and the India-ASEAN relationship. India Review, 12(3), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2013.820987

Chang, E. E. (n.d.). Behind the Shadows : Javanese wayang kulit puppets in Ramayana. National Heritage Board SG. https://www.roots.gov.sg/stories-landing/stories/behind-the-shadows-javanese-wayang-kulit-puppets.

Chaudhuri, R. (2012). The limits of executive power: Domestic politics and alliance behavior in Nehru’s India. India Review, 11(2), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14736489.2012.674820

Checkel, J. T. (2021). Process tracing and international political economy. In J. C. W. Pevehouse & L. Seabrooke (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international political economy (pp. 201–219). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/ 9780198793519.013.47

Coedes, G. (1947). The Indianized states of Southeast Asia. Australian National University Press.

Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823-830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429

Das, T., & Guha, P. (2022). Indo-ASEAN trade complementarity and favourability with transition from look east to act east policy: Evidence from Northeastern States of India. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 14(2), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12459

Nandy, D., & Das, M. (2025). India in the twenty-first century: Is a key player in Asian power dynamics? In D. Nandy, & M. Das (Eds.), Decoding the chessboard of Asian geopolitics (pp. 59-87). Palgrave Macmillan.

Foulon, M. (2015). Neoclassical realism: Challengers and bridging identities. International Studies Review, 17(4), 635–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12255

Gandhi, I. (1982). India and Its Foreign Policy. International Studies, 21(2), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881782021002001

Goddard, S. E., & Krebs, R. R. (2015). Rhetoric, legitimation, and grand strategy. Security Studies, 24(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2014.1001198

Hoffmann, S. (1986). Hedley Bull and his contribution to international relations. International Affairs, 62(2), 179–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/2618360

Howe, M. (1975). Mrs. Gandhi Hails Victory in Saigon. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1975/05/01/archives/mrs-gandhi-hails-victory-in-saigon-but-lee-at-commonwealth-talks.html

Hussain, N., & Hui, M. T. (2024). A decade of India’s Act East Policy: Doing more with ASEAN (S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) Commentary No. 127).

International Institute for Management Development. (2024). IMD world competitiveness booklet 2024. IMD – International Institute for Management Development. https://imd.widen.net/content/rjlc6fl2jl/pdf/booklet_wcy_2024.pdf.

India Parliament Lok Sabha. (1967). Lok Sabha Debates. Lok Sabha Secretariat.

Jabeen, M., & Mazhar, M. S. (2011). Security game: SEATO and CENTO as instrument of economic and military assistance to encircle Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 49(1), 109-132.

Jaffrelot, C. (2003). India’s look east policy: an Asianist strategy in perspective. India Review, 2(2), 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736480412331307022

Jain, M. (2021). Was India right in not joining RCEP? A cost–benefit analysis. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 77(4), 542-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 09749284211047728

Jaishankar, D. (2019). Acting east: India in the Indo-Pacific. Brookings Institution India Center.

Jaishankar, D. (2025). Vishwa Shastra: India and the World (1st ed.). India Penguin Viking.

Jha, P. K. (2017). India-ASEAN relations: An assessment. In C. Echle, M. Sarmah, & F. Kliem (Eds.), ASEAN at 50: A look at its external relations (pp. 107-124). Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Ltd.

Kitchen, N. (2010). Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: A neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation. Review of International Studies, 36(1), 117–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509990532

Kuik, C. C. (2021a). Asymmetry and authority: Theorizing Southeast Asian responses to China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Asian Perspective, 45(2), 255–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2021.0000

Kuik, C. C. (2021b). Elite legitimation and the agency of the host country: Evidence from Laos, Malaysia, and Thailand’s BRI engagement. In F. Schneider (Ed.), Global perspectives on China’s Belt and Road Initiative asserting agency through regional connectivity (pp. 217-244). Amsterdam Univeristy Press.

Lin, J. (2024, May 10). State of Southeast Asia 2024: India’s strategic conundrum of diminished influence and rising ambitions. Fulcrum. https://fulcrum.sg/aseanfocus/state-of-southeast-asia-2024-indias-strategic-conundrum-of-diminished-influence-and-rising-ambitions.

Lobell, S. E., Ripsman, N. M., & Taliaferro, J. W. (2009). Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge University Press.

Mabbett, I. W. (1977). The ‘Indianization’ of Southeast Asia: Reflections on the historical sources. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 8(2), 143–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0022463400009310

Majumdar, R. C. (1927). Ancient Indian colonies in the far East. Pun jab Sanskrit Book Depot.

McCourt, D. M., & Mudge, S. L. (2023). Anything but inevitable: How the Marshall Plan became possible. Politics & Society, 51(4), 463-492. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 00323292221094084

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. Norton.

Ministry of Defence India. (2023, May 9). Sea Phase of ASEAN-India Maritime 2023. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1922815

Mishra, R. (2013). China in India’s Southeast Asia strategy. In A. K. Das (Ed.), India-ASEAN defence relations (pp. 96-123). S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

Mishra, R. (2018). Twenty-Five years of India-ASEAN ties: An assessment. AEI Insights, 4(1), 89–106.

Mitra, S. K. (2009). Nuclear, engaged, and non-aligned: Contradiction and coherence in India’s foreign policy. India Quarterly, 65(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 097492840906500103

Morarji, B., & Sharma, V. N. (2015). Shifting trends in India and Southeast Asia relations.” International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 4(2), 97–112.

Morgenthau, H. J., Thompson, K. W., & Clinton, W. D. (1985). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (6th ed.). Knopf.

Naidu, G. V. C. (1998). The Manila ASEAN meetings and India. Strategic Analysis, 22(8), 1163–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700169808458872

Naidu, G. V.C. (2000). Future of institutionalism in the Asia Pacific: The ARF and Its implications for India. Strategic Analysis, 23(11), 1957–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09700160008455173

Naidu, G. V.C. (2004). Whither the look east policy: India and Southeast Asia. Strategic Analysis, 28(2), 331–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700160408450136

Naidu, G. V. C. (2005). India and the East Asian Summit. Strategic Analysis, 29(4), 711–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2005.12049837

Nehru, J. (1947). Discovery of India (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.

Ngaibiakching, & Pande, A. (2020). India’s Act East Policy and ASEAN: Building a Regional Order Through Partnership in the Indo-Pacific. International Studies, 57(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881719885526

Padmanabhan, K. (2024, April 3). India ranks low in strategic relevance in Southeast Asia, China edges out US, finds Singapore Institute. The Print. https://theprint.in/diplomacy/india-ranks-low-in-strategic-relevance-in-southeast-asia-china-edges-out-us-finds-singapore-institute/2025028/

Pant, H. V., & Singh, A. (2022). Can India’s defense industry make it on the export market? Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/03/09/india-defense-exports-russia-philippines-brahmos/

Pardesi, M. S. (2022). India’s China strategy under Modi continuity in the management of an asymmetric rivalry. International Politics, 59(1), 44-66. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00287-3

Power, P. F. (1967). India and Vietnam. Asian Survey, 7(10), 740–51. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2642422

Raghavan, P. S. (2017). The making of India’s Foreign Policy: From Non- Alignment to Multi-Alignment. Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 12(4), 326–41.

Rajan, M. S. (1963). Chinese aggression and the future of India’s non- alignment policy. International Studies, 5(1-2), 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088176300500115

Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814

Roy, N. (2015). Assuaging cold war anxieties: India and the failure of SEATO. Diplomacy and Statecraft 26(2): 322–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2015.1034571

Sabu, A. T. (2024, July 6). The complexities of India’s neighbourhood first policy. Modern Diplomacy. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2024/07/06/the-complexities-of-indias-neighbourhood-first-policy/

Seah, S., Ha, H.T., Martinus, M. & Thao, P.T.P. (2021). The State of Southeast Asia: 2021 survey report. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.

Seah, S., Lin, J., Martinus, M., Suvannaphakdy, S., & Thao, P. T. P. (2023). The State of Southeast Asia: 2023 Survey Report. ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute

Seah, S., Lin, J., Martinus, M., Fong, K., Aridati, I., Thao, P. T. P., & Chee, D. (2024). The State of Southeast Asia: 2024 survey report. ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute.

Seah, S., Lin, J., Martinus, M., Fong, K., Thao, P. T. P., & Aridati, I. Z. (2025). The State of Southeast Asia: 2025 survey report. ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute

Sebastian, S., Shalini, & Varghese, P. (2022). India’s neighborhood policy towards the Southeast Asian region: A study on act east policy supported. Department of International Studies, Politics and History Christ (Deemed To Be University) Bangalore & NCR Campus.

Seshadri, V S. (2022, December 30). DPG policy brief: Preparing for a review of the ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement (AITIGA). Delhi Policy Group. https://www.delhipolicygroup.org/publication/policy-briefs/preparing-for-a-review-of-the-asean-india-trade-in-goods-agreement-aitiga.html

Sharma, A., & Basu, P. (2024, October 10). Ten years of India’s act east policy. Observer Research Foundation. https://www.orfonline.org/english/expert-speak/ten-years-of-india-s-act-east-policy.

Sikri, R. (2009). India’s ‘Look East’ policy. Asia-Pacific Review, 16(1), 131–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439000902957624

Silverman, J. M. (1975). The domino theory: Alternatives to a self-fulfilling prophecy. Asian Survey, 15(11), 915-939.

Singh, S. (2011). From Delhi to Bandung: Nehru, ‘Indian-ness’ and ‘Pan-Asian-ness.’ South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 34(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00856401.2011.549084

Singh, S., & Marwah, R. (2024). India and ASEAN in the Indo Pacific. In S. Singh, & R. Marwah, India and ASEAN in the Indo Pacific (pp. 1-23). Springer Nature Singapore. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7309-5_1.

Sridharan, K. (1996). India and Asean: The long road to dialogue. The Round Table, 85(340), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358539608454333

Subrahmanyam, K. (2012). Grand strategy for first half of the 21st century. In K. Venkatshamy, & P. George (Eds.), Grand strategy for India 2020 and beyond (pp. 13-27). Pentagon Security International.

Sukarno. (1946, August 19). Letter to Jawaharlal Nehru [Letter]. P.R.S. Mani Collection, University of Technology Sydney. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/28097

Tagore, R. (1917). Nationalism (1st ed.). Macmillan and Co. Ltd.

Thakur, V. (2019). An Asian drama: The Asian relations conference, 1947. International History Review, 41(3), 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2018.1434809

Trimmer, T. (2014). "Bring in Outsiders Who Will Do the Work": Migration and British Malaya’s imperial labor hierarchy, 1900-1930. World History Connected, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.13021/whc.v11i3.4490

Vignesh, R., & Singh, A. K. (2022, December 16). ADMM-Plus and India’s Act East Policy. https://idsa.in/publisher/issuebrief/admm-plus-and-indias-act-east-policy

Vo, X.V. (2013). Vietnam-India relations in the light of India’s look east policy. Indian Council of World Affairs.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill.

Warbrick, C. (1983). Kampuchea: Representation and recognition. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 30(1), 234–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/30.1.234

Weinraub, B. (1973, February 7). Mrs. Gandhi hits U.S. policy in Asia. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1973/02/07/archives/mrs-gandhi-hits-us-policy-in-asia-she-voices-bitter-doubts-on.html

Yong, T. T., & Mun, S. C. (2009). The Evolution of India–ASEAN Relations. India Review, 8(1), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736480802665170

Zachariah, B. (2004). Nehru. Routledge.

Zainal-Abidin, M. (1996). Institutional Mechanism for ASEAN-India Cooperation: Trends and Prospects. Journal of Asian Economics, 7(4), 723–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-0078(96)90064-0

Downloads

Published

2026-10-09

How to Cite

Dollah, I. Z., & Abdullah, M. K. (2026). Shifting Alignments in India’s Southeast Asia Policies. JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies), 14(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v14i1.14219
Abstract 30  .
PDF downloaded 0  .