Melampaui Teologi Naskh: Fitrah Manusia sebagai Dasar Dialog Antaragama dalam Pemikiran Abdulaziz Sachedina

Alexander Aur

doi:10.21512/icj.v3i2.15840

Authors

Alexander Aur Program Studi Manajemen Perhotelan, Fakultas Pariwisata, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Karawaci, Banten, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/icj.v3i2.15840

Keywords:

Naskh theology , human nature, human dignity, equality among believers, interfaith dialogue

Abstract

One of the issues that frequently arises in interfaith relations is theological debate regarding various theological concepts. Theologians from every religion maintain various theological ideas on various topics such as the theology of salvation, the theology of scripture, the theology of revelation, and others. Differences in thought and efforts to build solid arguments on these various topics often hinder the establishment of dialogical relations between religions and among religious communities. Against this background, this article aims to explore Abdulaziz Sachedina's thoughts on the theological debate about ‘naskh’ and thoughts on human nature as the basis for interfaith dialogue. This type of research is qualitative and uses the methods of literature study and critical interpretation. Using these methods, this article contains a description of Abdulaziz Sachedina's thoughts and critical responses to them. The study finds that human nature as God's creation constitutes the foundation for equality among believers and for interreligious dialogue. As a contemporary Islamic thinker, Sachedina tries to go beyond ‘naskh’ theology by prioritizing the ontological status (nature) of humans as God's creation. Based on this ontological status, obstacles to interfaith dialogue due to differences in theological thinking on various topics within religions can be overcome. Thus, the goal of interfaith and interreligious dialogue can be achieved, namely, to glorify human dignity as God's creation.

Dimensions

References

Adawy, A. A. (2024). The Concept of Naskh in the Perspektif of Ali As-Shabuni (STUDY OF RAWĀI ’ AL-BAYĀN TAFSĪR

ĀYĀ Ṭ AL-A Ḥ KĀM. IJoReSCo - International Journal of Religion and Social Community, 2(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.30762/ijoresco.v2i1.3507

Agbaria, A. (2022). Education for Religious Pluralism in Islam: One Book or Series of Books, a Singular Message or Myriad Messages? Religions, 13(283). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040283

Al-faruq, U., Fajri, I., Firda, S. W., Ayuandari, O. V. F., & Maisun. (2024). Memahami Konsep Naskh dan Mansukh Dalam

Al-Qur ’ an : Sejarah , metode analisis , dan Pedoman. Relinesia: Jurnal Kajian Agama Dan Multikulturalisme Indonesia, 3(2), 136–141. http://jurnal.anfa.co.id/index.php/relinesia

Ferdiansyah, H., Irsyadi, M. M., Nisa’, N., Lubis, Z., & Nugroho, A. S. (2023). Melacak Jejak Konflik Keagamaan : Membangun Peta Keragaman Agama di Indonesia (2019-2022). Tashwirul Afkar, 42(1), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.51716/ta.v41i1.172

Furidha, B. W. (2023). Comprehension of the Descriptive Qualitative Research Method: A Critical Assessment of the Literature. ACITA WISESA: Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 2(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v2i4.443

Ghazali, A. M. (2009). Argumen Pluralisme Agama Membangun Toleransi Berbasis al- Qur’an. Kata Kita.

Hall, S., & Liebenberg, L. (2024). Qualitative Description as an Introductory Method to Qualitative Research for Master ’ s-Level Students and Research Trainees. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241242264

Hartani, M., & Nulhaqim, S. A. (2007). Analisis Konflik Antarumat Beragama di Aceh Singkil. Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 2(2), 93–99.

Hasan, A. (1965). THE THEORY OF NASKH. Islamic Studies, 4(2), 181–200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20832797%0AJSTOR

Ismail, L., Lumba, Y., Damayanti, N., Jariyah, F. A., Nur, D., & Afiat, F. (2024). Meretas Jalan Damai; Pandangan Terhadap Penyelesaian Konflik Antar Agama. AKSIOLOGI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 5(1), 83–90.

Kleden, P. B., & Sunarko, A. (2010). Dialektika Sekularisasi Diskusi Habermas- Ratzinger dan Tanggapan. Lamalera.

Knitter, P. F. (2008). Pengantar Teologi Agama-agama. Kanisius.

Konferensi Waligereja Indonesia. (1992). Katekismus Gereja Katolik. Konferensi Wali Gereja Indonesia.

Konferensi Waligereja Indonesia. (1996). Iman Katolik-Buku Informasi dan Referensi. Kanisius-Obor.

Küng, H. (2002). Etika Ekonomi-Politik Global: Mencari Visi Baru bagi Kelangsungan Agama di Abad XXI. Qalam.

Lestari, J. (2020). PLURALISME AGAMA DI INDONESIA Tantangan dan Peluang Bagi Keutuhan Bangsa. Al-Adyan: Journal of Religious Studies, 1(1), 29–38.

Nasution, H. (2020). Al- Qur’an dan Resolusi Konflik Antarumat Beragama di Indonesia. AL-Dhikira - Jurnal Studi Quran & Hadis, 2(1), 19–38.

Ohrvik, A. (2024). What is close reading ? An exploration of a methodology methodology. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, 28(2), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2024.2345001

Prasojo, Z. H., & Pabbajah, M. (2020). Akomodasi Kultural dalam Resolusi Konflik Bernuansa Agama di Indonesia. AQLAM - Journal of Islam and Plurality, 5(1), 1–28.

Ramadhani, T. D. (n.d.). Ratzinger dan Relativisme Iman. http://www.duniaesai.com/index.php/direktori/esai/38-filsafat/133-ratzinger-dan-relativisme- iman.html. Tulisan

Sachedina, A. (2001). The Islamic Roots of Democratic Pluralism. Oxford University Press.

Sachedina, A. (2007). Islamic theology of Christian ‐ Muslim Relations. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 8(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596419708721104

Sachedina, A. (2015). CONTINUING THE CONVERSATION ABOUT. Journal of Religious Ethics, Inc., 43(3), 543–556.

Sindhunata. (2004). Berfilsafat di Tengah Zaman Merebak Teror” dalam Majalah BASIS no. 11-12 Tahun ke-53, November-Desember 2004. BASIS, 11–12.

Williamson, G. . (2006). Westminster Confession of Faith (Pengakuan Iman Westminster). Penerbit Momentum.