Gender Fluidity in Contemporary Menswear: A Deleuzian Analysis and Gen Z Narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v16i2.13499Keywords:
gender-fluid fashion, menswear, Deleuzian theory, gender performativityAbstract
The market identity for menswear is undergoing a significant transformation toward a more diverse and inclusive range of options, primarily due to the rise of gender-fluid fashion. Research indicates that menswear evolves to offer a greater variety of gender-fluid and diverse clothing choices for the average male consumer, reflecting a shift in fashion consumption and expressions of masculinity. Notable trends reshaping the fashion landscape include the embrace of gender-flexible fashion and the rejection of toxic masculinity among Generation Z (Gen Z) men. The research aims to explore the trend of gender fluidity in contemporary menswear through a Deleuzian lens. It focuses on applying the theory of the senses and the concept of “becoming” based on the philosophical work of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. The analysis centers around a fashion design project titled Soul Equilibrium, which serves as the case study. Deleuzian theory is employed to examine the relationship between trend fluidity and changes in gender performativity as expressed through fashion. Qualitative data are gathered through observations, interviews, and literature reviews, with respondents selected through purposive sampling. These respondents include experts and individuals actively engaged in fashion. Key findings reveal that the intersection of gender-fluid fashion and performativity fosters a dynamic relationship among fashion, identity, and societal norms. Gender-fluid fashion emerges as a significant indicator of changing gender performativity in society. The concept of gender performativity highlights how individuals actively construct their gender identity through behavior and self-expression. The results of the research advocate for greater social acceptance and inclusivity within society.
References
Athill, C., & Bowstead, J. M. (2021). Special issue of critical studies in men’s fashion : ‘Globalizing men’s style’, 2021. Critical Studies in Men’s Fashion, 8(1), 51-53. https://doi.org/10.1386/csmf_00031_2
Atkinson, W. (2024). Field theory and assemblage theory: Toward a constructive dialogue. Theory, Culture & Society, 41(1), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764231167774
Bagdi, H., Bulsara, H. P., Sankar, D., & Sharma, L. (2023). The transition from traditional to digital: Factors that propel Generation Z’s adoption of online learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(3), 695-717. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2023-0003
Birren, F. (1961). Color psychology and color therapy: a factual study of the influence of color on human life. University Books.
Bowstead, J. M. (2018). Menswear Revolution. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474289030
Boyd, C. S., Ritch, E. L., Dodd, C. A., & McColl, J. (2020). Inclusive identities: Re-imaging the future of the retail brand? International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(12), 1315-1335. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2019-0392
Buentello, D. A., Bardey, A., & Rogaten, J. (2023). Beyond the gender dichotomy in fashion: Exploring the factors involved in cross-sexual fashion consumer behaviour for cisgender women. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 27(4), 697-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-03-2022-0047
Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893
Cheded, M., & Liu, C. (2022). ‘Which part of the day is (wo)man o’clock?’: Desires, urges and possibilities of (un)becoming. Marketing Theory, 22(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931211057463
Chira, S. (2022). The role of image in contemporary social communication – written clothes: The grammar of clothing language. Journal of Romanian Literary Studies, 30, 505-512.
Lautama, C. A., Hutama, K., & Saidi, A. I. (2022). Gaya androgini dalam pop culture. Jurnal Seni Dan Reka Rancang: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Desain, 5(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.25105/jsrr.v5i1.15274
English, B. (2013). A cultural history of fashion in the 20th and 21st centuries: From catwalk to sidewalk. A&C Black.
Fernández, R., Isakova, A., Luna, F., & Rambousek, B. (2021). Gender equality and inclusive growth. IMF Working Papers, 21(59). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513571164.001
Gazzola, P., Pavione, E., Pezzetti, R., & Grechi, D. (2020). Trends in the fashion industry. The perception of sustainability and circular economy: A gender/generation quantitative approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072809
Githapradana, D. M. W. (2022). Aesthetics and symbolic meaning of androgynous and CO-ED style trends in men’s fashion. Humaniora, 13(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v13i1.7378
Githapradana, W., Raharja, G., Ratna, T., & Pebryani, N. (2024). Gender and culture inclusivity in the story of Hope Fashion Collection. ARCHive-SR, 8(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.21625/archive.v8i1.1046
Haller, K. (2019). The little book of colour: How to use the psychology of colour to transform your life. Penguin Life.
Huang, C., Zhuang, S., & Ma, H. (2023). Poison or remedy? Masculinity in a pathos-based sustainable brand story. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(8), 1823-1838. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2022-0385
Hwang, J., & Zhao, L. (2022, September 23). How COVID-19 has shaped Gen Z's fashion consumption values?. In International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings (Vol. 78, No. 1). Iowa State University Digital Press. https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.13761
Istijanto, I., & Handoko, I. (2022). What approach and avoidance factors drive Gen-Z consumers to buy bubble tea? An exploratory study. Young Consumers, 23(3), 382-396. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-08-2021-1376
Kara, A., & Min, M. K. (2024). Gen Z consumers’ sustainable consumption behaviors: Influencers and moderators. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(1), 124-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2022-0263
Kushchyk, I. (2021). The relationship between gender transformations and the evolution of fashion. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 3. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2021.244404
Martin, D. (2021). Dapper dudes: An exploration of young men’s fashion consumption and conceptions of masculinity. (Doctoral dissertation, Toronto Metropolitan University). https://doi.org/10.32920/ryerson.14655633.v1
Misslin, F. (2020). Diagrammatic manifestos: A method for studying the fluidity of gender in the production of fashion photography. Fashion Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.38055/FS030106
Pan, Y. (2023). On the dialectical relationship between primitive societies and state societies in Deleuze’s political philosophy. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(03), 124-131. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.113008
Perger, N. (2024). Non-binary embodiment and bodily discomfort: Body as social signum. The Sociological Review, 72(1), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261231189049
Pham, X., & Bright, D. (2022). Mobility as rhizome and becoming: Experiences of Vietnamese women in crossing borders to do doctorates. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(5), 606-622. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211042089
Pohlmann, A., & Chen, Q. (2020). Better than sex: Further development and validation of the consumption gender scale. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(3), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-05-2019-3214
Talaat, R. M. (2022). Fashion consciousness, materialism and fashion clothing purchase involvement of young fashion consumers in Egypt: The mediation role of materialism. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 4(2), 132-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHASS-02-2020-0027
Wang, X., & Kim, H. (2020). An expression of the theory of “corps san organes” of Deleuze in contemporary fashion design. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(12), 513-523.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dewa Made Weda Githapradana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
