Political Communication Patterns through Social Media: A Case of an Indonesian Presidential Staff Twitter Account
Keywords:Political Communication Patterns, Social Media, Indonesian Presidential Staff, Twitter
Given the current technological developments, social media has become a necessity and a new tool that can complement services. Social media can influence the understanding of political communication and its impact on the public. Every element of society uses social media for various purposes, including the government. One who is quite active on Twitter and has repeatedly drawn controversy is the Presidential Chief of Staff, Retired General Moeldoko. The research investigates the pattern of political communication carried out by the Presidential Chief of Staff by focusing on his Twitter account and using the components of the effectiveness of political communication and media effects. The research applies a qualitative approach supported by the NVivo 12 Plus software. The data are collected using the NCapture for NVivo feature on the Presidential Chief of Staff’s Twitter account (@Dr Moeldoko). The results show that Moeldoko’s communication through Twitter is generally for the media or fellow government agencies. His communication is also a way to provide information about government programs. In addition, the research also finds that the alleged ineffectiveness in Twitter management is based on a decrease in account activity. It can be concluded that his pattern of communication is general, vertical, and not participatory.
D. V. Dimitrova and J. Matthes, “Social media in political campaigning around the world: Theoretical and methodological challenges,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 333–342, 2018.
D. Kreiss and S. C. McGregor, “Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 US presidential cycle,” Political Communication, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 155–177, 2018.
X. Gao and J. Lee, “E-government services and social media adoption: Experience of small local governments in Nebraska state,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 627–634, 2017.
S. Stier, A. Bleier, H. Lietz, and M. Strohmaier, “Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter,” Political Communication, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 50–74, 2018.
S. K. Patra, “Between knowledge and power: Political agenda and social engagement of political elites through micro-blogging (Twitter) in India,” J Mass Communicat Journalism, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2018.
G. Chacon, T. Giasson, and C. Brin, ““That’s what I’m talking about”: Twitter as a promotional tool for political journalists,” Popular Communication, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 276–292, 2018.
R. A. Distania, “Tiba-tiba, Moeldoko minta maaf ke warga Kalimantan dan Sumatra,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3dm7Dk3
M. J. Rizki, “Mempertanyakan tanggung jawab pemerintah dan korporasi dalam karhutla,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3BJPHJu
W. Lance Bennett, C. Breunig, and T. Givens, “Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of anti-Iraq war demonstrations in the US,” Political Communication, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 269–289, 2008.
Y. Guo and Y. Wei, “Government communication effectiveness on local acceptance of nuclear power: Evidence from China,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 218, pp. 38–50, 2019.
M. Machmud, B. Irawan, K. Karinda, J. Susilo, and Salahudin, “Analysis of the intensity of communication and coordination of government officials on Twitter social media during the Covid-19 handling in Indonesia,” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 319–319, 2021.
P. Fitriyah and I. D. A. Nurhaeni, “Netnography and social network analysis: Centrality actors reopening Indonesia’s tourism industry in a transitional era,” Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 257–273, 2021.
I. Ferazia, P. Prayudi, and S. Afifi, “Analysis of communication networks among political elites in the formation of party coalitions,” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 2020.
A. Gooch, “Ripping yarn: Experiments on storytelling by partisan elites,” Political Communication, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 220–238, 2018.
J. B. Berger, M. Hertzum, and T. Schreiber, “Does local government staff perceive digital communication with citizens as improved service?” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 258–269, 2016.
M. Masduki, “Blunders of government communication: The political economy of COVID-19 communication policy in Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 97–111, 2021.
M. W. Graham, “Government communication in the digital age: Social media’s effect on local government public relations,” Public Relations Inquiry, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 361–376, 2014.
M. Karlsson and J. A˚ stro¨m, “Social media and political communication: Innovation and normalisation in parallel,” Journal of Language and Politics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 305–323, 2018.
N. Strauß, S. Kruikemeier, H. Van Der Meulen, and G. Van Noort, “Digital diplomacy in GCC countries: Strategic communication of Western embassies on Twitter,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 369–379, 2015.
Y. Su, D. K. L. Lee, and P. Borah, “The conditional indirect effects of political social media information seeking and expression on government evaluation in Hong Kong: Revisiting the communication mediation model,” International Journal of Communication, vol. 15, pp. 277–299, 2021.
B. Oparaugo, “Media and politics: Political communication in the digital age,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Explorer (IJMRE), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 14–23, 2021.
M. Barnidge, “Exposure to political disagreement in social media versus face-to-face and anonymous online settings,” Political Communication, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 302–321, 2017.
L. Bode, “Gateway political behaviors: The frequency and consequences of low-cost political engagement on social media,” Social Media + Society, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2017.
H. Akar, “The role of political attitudes, political efficacy and social media usage patterns on political participation in social media in the 2019 local election: Bolu Abant ˙Izzet Baysal University Students Research,” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, no. 59, pp. 55–85, 2020.
A. Velasquez and R. LaRose, “Social media for social change: Social media political efficacy and activism in student activist groups,” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 456–474, 2015.
A. Velasquez and H. Rojas, “Political expression on social media: The role of communication competence and expected outcomes,” Social Media + Society, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2017.
S. Nofrima, A. Nurmandi, D. K. Dewi, and Salahudin, “Cyber-activism on the dissemination of #Gejayanmemanggil: Yogyakarta’s student movement,” Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 103–116, 2020.
D. V. Putsanra, “Demo Gejayan Memanggil Jogja dan Tragedi Moses Gatotkaca 1998,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3xssuJq
Y. Lu and J. Pan, “Capturing clicks: How the Chinese government uses clickbait to compete for visibility,” Political Communication, vol. 38, no. 1-2, pp. 23–54, 2021.
W. T. Daniel, L. Obholzer, and S. Hurka, “Static and dynamic incentives for Twitter usage in the European parliament,” Party Politics, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 771–781, 2019.
K. Al-Hussein, “The use of social media and perceptions of corruption within the Jordanian political elite,” Technology in Society, vol. 62, pp. 1–7, 2020.
K. Walton, “World leaders a-Twitter: Communication platforms and agenda-building during the 2018 NATO Summit,” Undergraduate Honors Thesis, University of Colorado Boulder, 2019.
P. Nulty, Y. Theocharis, S. A. Popa, O. Parnet, and K. Benoit, “Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the European parliament,” Electoral Studies, vol. 44, pp. 429–444, 2016.
H. Kermani, “Political narrating in non-political crises: Narrativity practices on Persian Twitter during the 2017 Kermanshah earthquake,” Asian Journal of Communication, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 431–449, 2020.
S. Ruslan, “Political communication and influence through Twitter,” Pro Publico Bono–Public Administration, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 94–105, 2020.
J. M. Scacco, L. Copeland, A. B. Becker, and J. Berger, “When the president tweets: Exploring the normative tensions of contemporary presidential communication,” International Journal of Communication, vol. 14, pp. 3119–3142, 2020.
J. Kahne and B. Bowyer, “The political significance of social media activity and social networks,” Political Communication, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 470–493, 2018.
M. Yamamoto, F. Dalisay, and M. J. Kushin, “An examination of uncivil and reasoned comments and perceived civility in politics,” International Journal of Communication, vol. 14, pp. 279–298, 2020.
M. B. Babac and V. Podobnik, “What social media activities reveal about election results? The use of Facebook during the 2015 general election campaign in Croatia,” Information Technology & People, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 327–347, 2018.
P. Barber´a and G. Rivero, “Understanding the political representativeness of Twitter users,” Social Science Computer Review, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 712–729, 2015.
A. Salman and M. A. M. Salleh, “Examining relationship between political agenda on social media and political support among university students,” Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 281–295, 2020.
D. Kapiszewski and S. Karcher, “Transparency in practice in qualitative research,” PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 285–291, 2021.
N. G. Fielding, “Critical qualitative research and impact in the public sphere,” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 142–152, 2020.
S. J. Tracy, “Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research,” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 837–851, 2010.
C. J. Vargo, L. Guo, and M. A. Amazeen, “The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016,” New media & Society, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 2028–2049, 2018.
F. Gilardi, T. Gessler, M. Kubli, and S. M¨uller, “Social media and political agenda setting,” Political Communication, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 39–60, 2022.
N. B. Gessese, “Poverty-alleviation communication practices of the Jerusalem Children and Community Development Organization (JeCCDO) in Negede Woito community, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia,” Palgrave Communications, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020.
W. Liu and S. Nah, “Community attachment, communication mediation, and nonprofit participation: An integrated community communication approach,” Voluntas, vol. 33, pp. 269–283, 2022.
O. Gonzalez Benson, “Welfare support activities of grassroots refugee-run community organizations: A reframing,” Journal of Community Practice, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2020.
B. H. Bramlett and R. P. Burge, “God talk in a digital age: How members of congress use religious language on Twitter,” Politics and Religion, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 316–338, 2021.
A. O. Larsson and E. Skogerbø, “Out with the old, in with the new? perceptions of social (and other) media by local and regional Norwegian politicians,” New Media & Society, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 219–236, 2018.
Copyright (c) 2022 Addin Khaerunnisa Juswil, Sanny Nofrima, Herdin Arie Saputra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)