The Intention to Use Blockchain in Indonesia Using Extended Approach Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v16i1.7609Keywords:
Intention to Use, Blockchain, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)Abstract
Globalization has quickly transformed the economy and society, marked by the rapid integration of data and information, supply chains, and increasingly huge use of technology. The research aims to analyze the level of intention to use blockchain in Indonesia, especially the My-T Wallet developed by Tokoin using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. The research modifies the TAM by adding other variables that play an essential role in making decisions about using blockchain. The target population is that the respondents at least know about blockchain developments, in this case, My-T Wallet from Tokoin. The research obtains as many as 103 respondents who fill out the questionnaire through the purposive sampling technique. The data are collected through online surveys and analyzed using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) approach with the SmartPLS software. The findings highlight that the perception of the usefulness of the My-T Wallet application is most strongly influenced by public influence. Meanwhile, perceived ease of use is most influenced by the user interface in My-T Wallet. Then, the intention to use My-T Wallet application is strongly influenced by users’ positive behavior. On the other hand, the level of trust of application users must continuously be increased by paying more attention to government regulations and security aspects.
Plum Analytics
References
I. Zambon, M. Cecchini, G. Egidi, M. G. Saporito, and A. Colantoni, “Revolution 4.0: Industry vs. agriculture in a future development for smes,” Processes, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2019.
A. Sudiwedani and G. S. Darma, “Analysis of the effect of knowledge, attitude, and skill related to the preparation of doctors in facing Industrial Revolution 4.0,” Bali Medical Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 524–530, 2020.
Asian Development Bank, “Innovate Indonesia: Unlocking growth through technological transformation,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https: //www.adb.org/publications/innovate-indonesia
H. A. Ramadhan and D. A. Putri, “Big data, kecerdasan buatan, blockchain, dan teknologi finansial di Indonesia: Ulasan desain, prinsip, dan rekomendasi kebijakan,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Kajian-Kominfo-CIPG-compressed.pdf
A. Jabbar and S. Dani, “Investigating the link between transaction and computational costs in a blockchain environment,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 3423–3436, 2020.
A. Hughes, A. Park, J. Kietzmann, and C. Archer-Brown, “Beyond Bitcoin: What blockchain and distributed ledger technologies mean for firms,” Business Horizons, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 273–281, 2019.
Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H. N. Dai, X. Chen, and H. Wang, “Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey,” International Journal of Web and Grid Services, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 352–375, 2018.
U. Rahardja, A. N. Hidayanto, T. Hariguna, and Q. Aini, “Design framework on tertiary education system in Indonesia using blockchain technology,” in 2019 7th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), vol. 7. Jakarta, Indonesia: IEEE, Nov. 6–8, 2019, pp. 1–4.
A. Kamilaris, A. Fonts, and F. X. Prenafeta-Bold´ν, “The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 91, pp. 640–652, 2019.
J. Li, S. Zhu, W. Zhang, and L. Yu, “Blockchaindriven supply chain finance solution for small and medium enterprises,” Frontiers of Engineering Management, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 500–511, 2020.
D. Shin and Y. Hwang, “The effects of security and traceability of blockchain on digital affordance,” Online Information Review, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 913–932, 2020.
A. P. Tedjakusuma and B. N. Yahya, “A study into opportunities and challenges of blockchain adoption for sustainable nonfinancial sector micro, small, medium enterprises–case studies in Indonesia,” in 17th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2020). Atlantis Press, 2020, pp. 30–35.
G. Vidan and V. Lehdonvirta, “Mine the gap: Bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessness,” New Media & Society, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 42–59, 2019.
M. M. Queiroz and S. F. Wamba, “Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 46, pp. 70–82, 2019.
H. W. Alomari, V. Ramasamy, J. D. Kiper, and G. Potvin, “A User Interface (UI) and User eXperience (UX) evaluation framework for cyberlearning environments in computer science and software engineering education,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1–18, 2020.
D. E. Putri, R. N. Ilham, M. Sinurat, Lilinesia, and M. M. S. Saragih, “Analysis of potential and risks investing in financial instruments and digital cryptocurrency assets during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Jurnal SEKURITAS (Saham, Ekonomi, Keuangan dan Investasi), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.
A. Seetharaman, A. S. Saravanan, N. Patwa, and J. Mehta, “Impact of Bitcoin as a world currency,” Accounting and Finance Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 230–246, 2017.
M. Kamil, A. S. Bist, U. Rahardja, N. P. L. Santoso, and M. Iqbal, “COVID-19: Implemen-tation e-voting blockchain concept,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2021.
I. G. N. A. P. Putra and G. S. Darma, “Is Bitcoin accepted in Indonesia?” International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 424–430, 2019.
B. A. Ramadhan and B. M. Iqbal, “User experience evaluation on the cryptocurrency website by trust aspect,” in 2018 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS), vol. 3. Bangkok, Thailand: IEEE, Oct. 21–24, 2018, pp. 274–279.
S. Alzahrani and T. U. Daim, “Evaluation of the cryptocurrency adoption decision using Hierarchical Decision Modeling (HDM),” in 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). Portland, OR, USA: IEEE, Aug. 25–29, 2019, pp. 1–7.
H. Albayati, S. K. Kim, and J. J. Rho, “Accepting financial transactions using blockchain technology and cryptocurrency: A customer perspective approach,” Technology in Society, vol. 62, 2020.
D. Folkinshteyn and M. Lennon, “Braving bitcoin: A technology acceptance model (tam) analysis,” Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 220–249, 2016.
S. Kamble, A. Gunasekaran, and H. Arha, “Understanding the blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 2009–2033, 2019.
M. Saunders, P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill, Research methods for business students. Harlow: Pearson, 2016.
F. D. Davis, “A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results,” Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985.
——, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.
B. Von Solms and R. Von Solms, “Cybersecurity and information security–What goes where?” Information & Computer Security, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 2–9, 2018.
D. J. Ketchen Jr, “A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling,” Long Range Planning, vol. 46, no. 1–2, pp. 184–185, 2013.
J. Li, J. Wang, S. Wangh, and Y. Zhou, “Mobile payment with Alipay: An application of extended technology acceptance model,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 50 380–50 387, 2019.
M. Awwad, S. R. Kalluru, V. K. Airpulli, M. S. Zambre, A. Marathe, and P. Jain, “Blockchain technology for efficient management of supply chain,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2018, pp. 440–449.
G. Jain, H. Singh, K. R. Chaturvedi, and S. Rakesh, “Blockchain in logistics industry: In fizz customer trust or not,” Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 541–558, 2020.
D.-H. Shin, S. Lee, and Y. Hwang, “How do credibility and utility play in the user experience of health informatics services?” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 67, pp. 292–302, 2017.
E. C. Bianchi and J. Brockner, “In the eyes of the beholder? The role of dispositional trust in judgments of procedural and interactional fairness,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 46–59, 2012.
D. J. Mills and L. Nower, “Preliminary findings on cryptocurrency trading among regular gamblers: A new risk for problem gambling?” Addictive Behaviors, vol. 92, pp. 136–140, 2019.
G. Nuryyev, Y.-P. Wang, J. Achyldurdyyeva, B.-S. Jaw, Y.-S. Yeh, H.-T. Lin, and L.-F. Wu, “Blockchain technology adoption behavior and sustainability of the business in tourism and hospitality smes: An empirical study,” Sustainability, vol. 12, pp. 1–21, 2020.
S. F. Wamba and M. M. Queiroz, “The role of social influence in blockchain adoption: The Brazilian supply chain case,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 1715–1720, 2019.
N. E. Friedkin, A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
M. A. Shareef, Y. K. Dwivedi, V. Kumar, and U. Kumar, “Content design of advertisement for consumer exposure: Mobile marketing through short messaging service,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 257–268, 2017.
I. F. Liu, M. C. Chen, Y. S. Sun, D. Wible, and C. H. Kuo, “Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community,” Computers & Education, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 600–610, 2010.
Y. J. Joo, H. W. Lee, and Y. Ham, “Integrating user interface and personal innovativeness into the TAM for mobile learning in Cyber University,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 143–158, 2014.
K. Salah, M. H. U. Rehman, N. Nizamuddin, and A. Al-Fuqaha, “Blockchain for AI: Review and open research challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 10 127–10 149, 2019.
V. Venkatesh, J. Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu, “Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 157–178, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Upayana Wiguna Eka Saputra, Gede Sri Darma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
