The Influence of Perceived Risk and Trust in Adoption of FinTech Services in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v13i1.5708Keywords:
Trust, Perceived Risk, FinTech, TAMAbstract
The service level in community must be considered if it wants to continue to be used by the users. This research studies the adoption of Financial Technology (FinTech) services in the terms of trust and risk. The work employs the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) theory as the theoretical basis combined with trust and perceived risk. The research method is quantitative. The data are analyzed by the Structural Equation Model (SEM) using Smart PLS V2.0. The researchers use a questionnaire in Google Form to collect the data. It is distributed online with the snowball data collection technique. As a result, 548 respondents are successfully gathered. The results indicate that the factor of users trusts influences perceived usefulness in the adoption to use FinTech services. However, the risk factor does not affect the use of FinTech services, which further does not influence the users’ attitude. The work contributes to the study of the adoption of FinTech services, which provides a view determining the users’ intention to use FinTech services in Indonesia.
Plum Analytics
References
A. Sharma, “Trends in Internet-based business-tobusiness marketing,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 77–84, 2002.
D. W. Stewart and Q. Zhao, “Internet marketing, business models, and public policy,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, vol. 19, no. 2, pp.287–296, 2000.
B. Nicoletti, The future of FinTech: Integrating finance and technology in financial services. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
V. Dhar and R. M. Stein, “FinTech platforms and strategy,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 32–35, 2017.
K. Gai, M. Qiu, and X. Sun, “A survey on FinTech,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 103, pp. 262–273, 2018.
I. H. Chiu, “A new era in FinTech payment innovations? A perspective from the institutions and regulation of payment systems,” Law, Innovation and Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 190–234, 2017.
E. Fernando, A. R. Condrobimo, D. F. Murad, L. M. Tirtamulia, G. Savina, and P. Listvo, “User behavior adopt utilizing FinTech services on online transportation in Indonesia (Scale validation and developed instrument),” in 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech). Jakarta, Indonesia: IEEE, Sept. 3–5, 2018, pp. 1–9.
I. H. Chiu, “FinTech and disruptive business models in financial products, intermediation and markets-policy implications for financial regulators,” Journal of Technology Law and Policy, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 55–112, 2016.
W. Y. Moon and S. D. Kim, “A payment mediation platform for heterogeneous fintech schemes,” in 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC). Xi’an, China: IEEE, Oct. 3–5, 2016, pp. 511–516.
Surjandy, Ernawaty, P. Listyo, E. Fernando, G. Savina, and L. M. Tirtamulia, “Technology risk in financial technology at online transportation systems,” in 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech). Jakarta, Indonesia: IEEE, Sept. 3–5, 2018, pp. 1–9.
A. DiCaprio, Y. Yao, and R. Simms. (2017) Women and trade: Genders impact on trade finance and FinTech. [Online]. Available: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/389186/adbi-wp797.pdf
C. Baden-Fuller and S. Haefliger, “Business models and technological innovation,” Long Range Planning, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 419–426, 2013.
S. Chishti and J. Barberis, The FinTech book: The financial technology handbook for investors, entrepreneurs and visionaries. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
E. Fernando, Surjandy, Meyliana, and D. Touriano, “Development and validation of instruments adoption FinTech services in Indonesia (Perspective of trust and risk),” in 2018 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (SIET). Malang, Indonesia: IEEE, Nov. 10–12, 2018, pp. 283–287.
A. Teja, “Indonesian FinTech business: New innovations or foster and collaborate in business ecosystems?” The Asian Journal of Technology Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2017.
Y. Kim, Y. J. Park, J. Choi, and J. Yeon, “The adoption of mobile payment services for Fin-Tech,” International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1058–1061, 2016.
A. Kesharwani and S. Singh Bisht, “The impact of trust and perceived risk on Internet banking adoption in India: An extension of technology acceptance model,” International Journal of Bank Marketing, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 303–322, 2012.
T. D. Nguyen and P. A. Huynh, “The roles of perceived risk and trust on e–payment adoption,” in International Econometric Conference of Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam: Springer, Jan. 15–16, 2018, pp. 926–940.
Surjandy, E. Fernando, Meyliana, A. R. Condro-bimo, I. S. Edbert, and Vivien, “The safe and trust factors of mobile transportation system for user behavior in Indonesia,” in 2018 International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Nov. 21–22, 2018.
F. D. Davis, “A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.
S. Khedun, B. Maharaj, C. Lockett, and W. Leary, “Influence of ethyl alcohol when given alone or in combination with potassium and/or magnesium supplements on ventricular fibrillation threshold levels in laboratory rats.” Magnesium Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 115–120, 1992.
F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003, 1989.
V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly, pp. 425–478, 2003.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.
J. Wu, L. Liu, and L. Huang, “Exploring user acceptance of innovative mobile payment service in emerging market: The moderating effect of diffusion stages of WeChat payment in China.” in Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Chiayi, Taiwan, June 27–July 1, 2016, p. 238.
F. F. Malaquias and Y. Hwang, “Trust in mobile banking under conditions of information asymmetry: Empirical evidence from Brazil,” Information Development, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1600–1612, 2016.
K. Kim and B. Prabhakar, “Initial trust, perceived risk, and the adoption of internet banking,” in International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Brisbane, Australia, Dec. 10–13, 2002.
G. M. Agag and A. A. El-Masry, “Why do consumers trust online travel websites? Drivers and outcomes of consumer trust toward online travel websites,” Journal of Travel Research, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 347–369, 2017.
H. Damghanian, A. Zarei, and M. A. Siahsarani Kojuri, “Impact of perceived security on trust, perceived risk, and acceptance of online banking in iran,” Journal of Internet Commerce, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 214–238, 2016.
D. Gefen, “E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust,” Omega, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 725–737, 2000.
J. P. Peter and M. J. Ryan, “An investigation of perceived risk at the brand level,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 184–188, 1976.
Q. Yang, C. Pang, L. Liu, D. C. Yen, and J. M. Tarn, “Exploring consumer perceived risk and trust for online payments: An empirical study in China’s younger generation,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 50, pp. 9–24, 2015.
H. S. Ryu, “Understanding benefit and risk framework of fintech adoption: Comparison of early adopters and late adopters,” in Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, Jan. 3–6, 2018.
J. M. Hansen, G. Saridakis, and V. Benson, “Risk, trust, and the interaction of perceived ease of use and behavioral control in predicting consumers use of social media for transactions,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 80, pp. 197–206, 2018.
Z. Hu, S. Ding, S. Li, L. Chen, and S. Yang, “Adoption intention of FinTech services for bank users: An empirical examination with an extended Technology Acceptance Model,” Symmetry, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2019.
M. C. Lee, “Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 130–141, 2009.
L. M. Chuang, C. C. Liu, and H. K. Kao, “The adoption of FinTech service: TAM perspective,” International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1–15, 2016.
D. Barclay, C. Higgins, and R. Thompson, “The Partial Least Square (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration,” Technology Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 285–309, 1995.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)