Factors Affecting the Successful Implementation of E-Government on Network Documentation and Legal Information Website in Riau
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v12i1.4361Keywords:
Information System, DeLone and McLean Model, Unified Theory Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), E-GovernmentInformation System, E-GovernmentAbstract
Network documentation and legal information website is a form of e-government applications such as Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum (JDIH). JDIH website must be designed to be an effective and efficient information system. This study aims to determine the success factors of the implementation of JDIH website. The DeLone and McLean model and the Unified Theory Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) are the models used in this study. The case study is conducted in the Riau legal and human rights office. Data are obtained through questionnaires from 252 respondents in the Riau provincial government and some communities. The analysis uses Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Analysis of Moment Structure (AMOS). The results of this study show that nine hypotheses have positive effects. Meanwhile, four hypotheses have no positive effects on the success and use of JDIH website. The findings of this research will be used as a reference in
the development of JDIH website in the future.
Plum Analytics
References
A. A. A. AL Athmay, K. Fantazy, and V. Kumar, “E-government adoption and users satisfaction: An empirical investigation,” EuroMed Journal of Business, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 57–83, 2016.
J. F. Affisco and K. S. Soliman, “E-government: A strategic operations management framework for service delivery,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2006.
L. Torres, V. Pina, and B. Acerete, “Egovernment developments on delivering public services among eu cities,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 217–238, 2005.
E. Ziemba, T. Papaj, and M. Jadamus-Hacura, “Adopting state and local e-government: Empirical evidence from poland,” in Proc Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on e-Government, ed. by M. Deˇcman and T. Juki´c, Slovenia, vol. 1, 2016, pp. 255–264.
M. N. Ucok and A. Lawi, “Kakas kolaborasi e-government berbasis cloud computing,” Jurnal Sain dan Teknologi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 87–91, 2014.
M. Gupta and D. Jana, “E-government evaluation: A framework and case study,” Government information quarterly, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 365–387, 2003.
W. H. Delone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, 2003.
V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS quarterly, pp. 425–478, 2003.
V. Khayun and P. Ractham, “Measuring e-excise tax success factors: Applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model,” in 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–10.
M. Scott, W. DeLone, and W. Golden, “Measuring egovernment success: A public value approach,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 187–208, 2016.
K. R. Ulhas, J. Wang, and J.-Y. Lai, “Impacts of collaborative information systems quality on software development success in Indian software firms,” in Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). IEEE, 2015, pp. 1377–1386.
S. Mardiana, “An integrated framework for measuring information system success considering the impact of culture in Indonesia,” in 1st International Conference on Information Technology, Computer and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE). IEEE, 2014, pp. 226–232.
A. Susanto, R. B. Bahaweres, and H. Zo, “Exploring the influential antecedents of actual use of internet banking services in Indonesia,” in IEEE Conference on Control, Systems & Industrial Informatics (ICCSII). IEEE, 2012, pp. 244–249.
G. Iskender and S. O¨ zkan, “E-government transformation
success: An assessment methodology and the preliminary results,” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 7, no. 3,
pp. 364–392, 2013.
S. Petter, W. DeLone, and E. McLean, “Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 236–263, 2008.
K. C. Lee and N. Chung, “Understanding factors affecting trust in and satisfaction with mobile banking in korea: A modified delone and mcleans model perspective,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 21, no. 5-6, pp. 385–392, 2009.
D. B. Setyohadi, M. Aristian, B. L. Sinaga, and N. A. A. Hamid, “social critical factors affecting intentions and behaviours to use e-learning: An empirical investigation using technology acceptance
model,” Asian Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 271–280, 2017.
D. M. West, “E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes,” Public Administration Review, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2004.
W. H. Delone and E. R. Mclean, “Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce,
vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 31–47, 2004.
W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable,” Information Systems Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60–95, 1992.
M. Zviran and Z. Erlich, “Measuring is user satisfaction:
review and implications,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 5, 2003.
K. A. Fantazy, V. Kumar, and U. Kumar, “Supply management practices and performance in the canadian hospitality industry,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 29, no. 4, pp.
–693, 2010.
Y. P. Gupta and T. M. Somers, “Business strategy, manufacturing flexibility, and organizational performance relationships: a path analysis approach,” Production and Operations Management, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 204–233, 1996.
R. J. Vokurka and S.W. O’Leary-Kelly, “A review of empirical research on manufacturing flexibility,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 485–501, 2000.
R. C. MacCallum, M. W. Browne, and H. M. Sugawara, “Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.” Psychological methods, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 130, 1996.
J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham, Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall, 1998.
L. T. Hu and P. M. Bentler, “Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.” Psychological methods, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 424, 1998.
M. D. Williams, N. P. Rana, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “A bibliometric analysis of articles citing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology,” in Information Systems Theory. Springer, 2012, pp. 37–62.
P. Raeth, S. Smolnik, N. Urbach, and C. Zimmer, “Towards assessing the success of social software in corporate environments,” AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, p. 662, 2009.
Y. S. Wang, “Assessing e-commerce systems success: a respecification and validation of the delone and mclean model of is success,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 529–557,
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
