Digital Technology: the Effect of Connected World to Computer Ethic and Family
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v9i1.1654Keywords:
Ethical aspects, Assessment tools, Engineering ethic, Ethic educationAbstract
The development of digital technology such as smartphones, tablets and other gadgets grows very rapidly in the last decade so does the development of mobile applications for those mobile systems or smartphones. Unfortunately, those applications often do not specify the age range for their users. This is actually a problem in the world of digital technology and software development. It is not yet known whether the applications is good be used for children or not. Nowadays, parents are faced with the dilemma of allowing their children to use these modern gadgets, which often lead to serious addiction or keeping them in the dark and risk raising ignorant kids. This research shows 80% of respondents agree or strongly agree that the gadget will affect to the development of children social skill. Therefore, in this research, the framework for ethical assessment is introduced and it can be applied to digital technology included gadget and its application in order to mitigate the negative effect of digital technology and gadgets.Plum Analytics
References
M. Bauerlein, The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeop- ardizes our future (or, don’t trust anyone under
. Penguin, 2008.
S. Azhar, “Building information modeling (bim): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the aec industry,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, 2011.
S. S. Dawes, “Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 377–394, 1996.
E. Brynjolfsson and S. Yang, “Information tech- nology and productivity: a review of the litera- ture,” Advances in computers, vol. 43, pp. 179–
, 1996.
Z. HongYan and W. JiKui, “Study on learning performance evaluation of distance continuing education,” in Advanced Technology in Teaching. Springer, 2013, pp. 255–260.
E. Danneels, “Disruptive technology reconsid- ered: A critique and research agenda,” Journal of product innovation management, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 246–258, 2004.
D. W. Bates, R. S. Evans, H. Murff, P. D. Stetson, L. Pizziferri, and G. Hripcsak, “Detecting adverse events using information technology,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 115–128, 2003.
M. Stefanelli et al., “Knowledge and process management in health care organizations,” Meth- ods Inf Med, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 525–535, 2004.
C. Yin, Y. Song, Y. Tabata, H. Ogata, and G.-J.
Hwang, “Developing and implementing a frame- work of participatory simulation for mobile learn- ing using scaffolding,” Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 137–
, 2013.
E. Wartella, V. Rideout, A. Lauricella, and S. Connell, “Parenting in the age of digital tech- nology,” Report for the Center on Media and Human Development School of Communication Northwestern University, 2013.
J. Stenson, “Educating in virtue,” in The 2nd Pan American Conference on Family and Education, Toronto, Ontario, May 1996.
I. Harris, R. Jennings, D. Pullinger, S. Rogerson, and P. Duquenoy, “Helping ict professionals to assess ethical issues in new and emerging technologies,” in MINAmI workshop on ambient intelligence and ethics. University of Pavia, Man- tua, Italy. http://www. fp6-minami. org/. Accessed December, vol. 15, 2008, p. 2008.
J. Borenstein, B. K. Jesiek, C. B. Zoltowski, and Q. Zhu, “Workshop-assessing science and engi- neering ethics outcomes: An interactive review of tools,” in Ethics in Science, Technology and Engi- neering, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 2014, pp. 1–3.
B. De Win, R. Scandariato, K. Buyens, J. Gre´goire, and W. Joosen, “On the secure software development process: Clasp, sdl and touchpoints compared,” Information and software technology, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1152–1171, 2009.
M. P. Papazoglou, P. Traverso, S. Dustdar, and
F. Leymann, “Service-oriented computing: a re- search roadmap,” International Journal of Coop- erative Information Systems, vol. 17, no. 02, pp.
–255, 2008.
A. Pretschner, M. Broy, I. H. Kruger, and T. Stauner, “Software engineering for automotive systems: A roadmap,” in 2007 Future of Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, 2007, pp.
–71.
D. Mellado, C. Blanco, L. E. Sa´nchez, and E. Ferna´ndez-Medina, “A systematic review of security requirements engineering,” Computer Standards & Interfaces, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 153–
, 2010.
C. Ebert and C. Jones, “Embedded software: Facts, figures, and future,” Computer, no. 4, pp.
–52, 2009.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)